forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[MachineCopyPropagation] Fix a bug with undef handling when the value is actualy alive.
Test case will follow. llvm-svn: 238518
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb337035f2
commit
75afbfd4a1
|
@ -252,11 +252,7 @@ bool MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
|
|||
report_fatal_error("MachineCopyPropagation should be run after"
|
||||
" register allocation!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Treat undef use like defs.
|
||||
// The backends are allowed to do whatever they want with undef value
|
||||
// and we cannot be sure this register will not be rewritten to break
|
||||
// some false dependencies for the hardware for instance.
|
||||
if (MO.isDef() || MO.isUndef()) {
|
||||
if (MO.isDef()) {
|
||||
Defs.push_back(Reg);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -270,6 +266,14 @@ bool MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
|
|||
MaybeDeadCopies.remove(CI->second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Treat undef use like defs for copy propagation but not for
|
||||
// dead copy. We would need to do a liveness check to be sure the copy
|
||||
// is dead for undef uses.
|
||||
// The backends are allowed to do whatever they want with undef value
|
||||
// and we cannot be sure this register will not be rewritten to break
|
||||
// some false dependencies for the hardware for instance.
|
||||
if (MO.isUndef())
|
||||
Defs.push_back(Reg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The instruction has a register mask operand which means that it clobbers
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue