From 70004ec4567a7eda48a82962b59512837a054dc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cameron Esfahani Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:52:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix pointer-signext.c test case: it was relying on value names, which don't appear in the non-assert build. Switch to using check-next as well. llvm-svn: 113964 --- clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-signext.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-signext.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-signext.c index e6bdbcc86e46..23395a19cf62 100644 --- a/clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-signext.c +++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-signext.c @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ // Under Windows 64, int and long are 32-bits. Make sure pointer math doesn't // cause any sign extensions. -// CHECK: %sub.ptr.sub = add i64 %param, -8 -// CHECK: %0 = inttoptr i64 %sub.ptr.sub to %struct.anon* -// CHECK: %tmp3 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.anon* %0, i64 0, i32 0 +// CHECK: [[P:%.*]] = add i64 %param, -8 +// CHECK-NEXT: [[Q:%.*]] = inttoptr i64 [[P]] to [[R:%.*]] +// CHECK-NEXT: {{%.*}} = getelementptr inbounds [[R]] [[Q]], i64 0, i32 0 #define CR(Record, TYPE, Field) \ ((TYPE *) ((unsigned char *) (Record) - (unsigned char *) &(((TYPE *) 0)->Field)))