[PatternMatch] add special-case uaddo matching for increment-by-one

This is the most important uaddo problem mentioned in PR31754:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754

We were failing to match the canonicalized pattern when it's an 'add 1' operation.
Pattern matching, however, shouldn't assume that we have canonicalized IR, so we 
match 4 commuted variants of uaddo.

There's also a test with a crazy type to show that the existing CGP transform 
based on this matcher is not limited by target legality checks, but that's a
different problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57516

llvm-svn: 352766
This commit is contained in:
Sanjay Patel 2019-01-31 16:40:07 +00:00
parent 9aa55d3c66
commit 6fa5e62c25
3 changed files with 40 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -1463,6 +1463,20 @@ struct UAddWithOverflow_match {
if (AddExpr.match(ICmpRHS) && (ICmpLHS == AddLHS || ICmpLHS == AddRHS))
return L.match(AddLHS) && R.match(AddRHS) && S.match(ICmpRHS);
// Match special-case for increment-by-1.
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) {
// (a + 1) == 0
// (1 + a) == 0
if (AddExpr.match(ICmpLHS) && m_ZeroInt().match(ICmpRHS) &&
(m_One().match(AddLHS) || m_One().match(AddRHS)))
return L.match(AddLHS) && R.match(AddRHS) && S.match(ICmpLHS);
// 0 == (a + 1)
// 0 == (1 + a)
if (m_ZeroInt().match(ICmpLHS) && AddExpr.match(ICmpRHS) &&
(m_One().match(AddLHS) || m_One().match(AddRHS)))
return L.match(AddLHS) && R.match(AddRHS) && S.match(ICmpRHS);
}
return false;
}
};

View File

@ -42,9 +42,7 @@ define void @test_0(i64*, i64*) {
define void @test_1(i64*, i64*) {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_1:
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: incq (%rdi)
; CHECK-NEXT: sete %al
; CHECK-NEXT: addb $-1, %al
; CHECK-NEXT: addq $1, (%rdi)
; CHECK-NEXT: adcq $0, (%rsi)
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
%3 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8

View File

@ -105,10 +105,11 @@ exit:
define i1 @uaddo_i64_increment(i64 %x, i64* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @uaddo_i64_increment(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = add i64 [[X:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OV:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[A]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 [[A]], i64* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD_OVERFLOW:%.*]] = call { i64, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i64(i64 [[X:%.*]], i64 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD:%.*]] = extractvalue { i64, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OVERFLOW:%.*]] = extractvalue { i64, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store i64 [[UADD]], i64* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OVERFLOW]]
;
%a = add i64 %x, 1
%ov = icmp eq i64 %a, 0
@ -118,10 +119,11 @@ define i1 @uaddo_i64_increment(i64 %x, i64* %p) {
define i1 @uaddo_i8_increment_noncanonical_1(i8 %x, i8* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @uaddo_i8_increment_noncanonical_1(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = add i8 1, [[X:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OV:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[A]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 [[A]], i8* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD_OVERFLOW:%.*]] = call { i8, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i8(i8 1, i8 [[X:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD:%.*]] = extractvalue { i8, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OVERFLOW:%.*]] = extractvalue { i8, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 [[UADD]], i8* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OVERFLOW]]
;
%a = add i8 1, %x ; commute
%ov = icmp eq i8 %a, 0
@ -131,10 +133,11 @@ define i1 @uaddo_i8_increment_noncanonical_1(i8 %x, i8* %p) {
define i1 @uaddo_i32_increment_noncanonical_2(i32 %x, i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @uaddo_i32_increment_noncanonical_2(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = add i32 [[X:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OV:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 0, [[A]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 [[A]], i32* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD_OVERFLOW:%.*]] = call { i32, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i32(i32 [[X:%.*]], i32 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD:%.*]] = extractvalue { i32, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OVERFLOW:%.*]] = extractvalue { i32, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 [[UADD]], i32* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OVERFLOW]]
;
%a = add i32 %x, 1
%ov = icmp eq i32 0, %a ; commute
@ -144,10 +147,11 @@ define i1 @uaddo_i32_increment_noncanonical_2(i32 %x, i32* %p) {
define i1 @uaddo_i16_increment_noncanonical_3(i16 %x, i16* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @uaddo_i16_increment_noncanonical_3(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = add i16 1, [[X:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OV:%.*]] = icmp eq i16 0, [[A]]
; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 [[A]], i16* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD_OVERFLOW:%.*]] = call { i16, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i16(i16 1, i16 [[X:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD:%.*]] = extractvalue { i16, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OVERFLOW:%.*]] = extractvalue { i16, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store i16 [[UADD]], i16* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OVERFLOW]]
;
%a = add i16 1, %x ; commute
%ov = icmp eq i16 0, %a ; commute
@ -159,10 +163,11 @@ define i1 @uaddo_i16_increment_noncanonical_3(i16 %x, i16* %p) {
define i1 @uaddo_i42_increment_illegal_type(i42 %x, i42* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @uaddo_i42_increment_illegal_type(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A:%.*]] = add i42 [[X:%.*]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OV:%.*]] = icmp eq i42 [[A]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: store i42 [[A]], i42* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OV]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD_OVERFLOW:%.*]] = call { i42, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i42(i42 [[X:%.*]], i42 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: [[UADD:%.*]] = extractvalue { i42, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[OVERFLOW:%.*]] = extractvalue { i42, i1 } [[UADD_OVERFLOW]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: store i42 [[UADD]], i42* [[P:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OVERFLOW]]
;
%a = add i42 %x, 1
%ov = icmp eq i42 %a, 0