forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Attempt to appease C++11 buildbots
Explicit operator bool doesn't not play nicely with gtest assertion macros (i.e. it performs as advertised and I wish that gtest subverted it for me). llvm-svn: 201639
This commit is contained in:
parent
c514a8041f
commit
6f95efb683
|
@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, status_queries) {
|
|||
ErrorOr<vfs::Status> Status((error_code()));
|
||||
|
||||
D->addRegularFile("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = D->status("/foo"));
|
||||
Status = D->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->isStatusKnown());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status->isDirectory());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->isRegularFile());
|
||||
|
@ -84,7 +85,8 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, status_queries) {
|
|||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->exists());
|
||||
|
||||
D->addDirectory("/bar");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = D->status("/bar"));
|
||||
Status = D->status("/bar");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->isStatusKnown());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->isDirectory());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status->isRegularFile());
|
||||
|
@ -93,7 +95,8 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, status_queries) {
|
|||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->exists());
|
||||
|
||||
D->addSymlink("/baz");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = D->status("/baz"));
|
||||
Status = D->status("/baz");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->isStatusKnown());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status->isDirectory());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status->isRegularFile());
|
||||
|
@ -102,8 +105,8 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, status_queries) {
|
|||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->exists());
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->equivalent(*Status));
|
||||
ErrorOr<vfs::Status> Status2((error_code()));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status2 = D->status("/foo"));
|
||||
ErrorOr<vfs::Status> Status2 = D->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status2.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status->equivalent(*Status2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -116,10 +119,12 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, base_only_overlay) {
|
|||
EXPECT_FALSE(Status = O->status("/foo"));
|
||||
|
||||
D->addRegularFile("/foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status = D->status("/foo"));
|
||||
Status = D->status("/foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
|
||||
ErrorOr<vfs::Status> Status2((error_code()));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status2 = O->status("/foo"));
|
||||
Status2 = O->status("/foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(errc::success, Status2.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status->equivalent(*Status2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -136,14 +141,20 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, overlay_files) {
|
|||
StatusM((error_code())), StatusT((error_code()));
|
||||
|
||||
Base->addRegularFile("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(StatusB = Base->status("/foo"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status1 = O->status("/foo"));
|
||||
StatusB = Base->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, StatusB.getError());
|
||||
Status1 = O->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status1.getError());
|
||||
Middle->addRegularFile("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(StatusM = Middle->status("/foo"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status2 = O->status("/foo"));
|
||||
StatusM = Middle->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, StatusM.getError());
|
||||
Status2 = O->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status2.getError());
|
||||
Top->addRegularFile("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(StatusT = Top->status("/foo"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status3 = O->status("/foo"));
|
||||
StatusT = Top->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, StatusT.getError());
|
||||
Status3 = O->status("/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status3.getError());
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status1->equivalent(*StatusB));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status2->equivalent(*StatusM));
|
||||
|
@ -170,12 +181,16 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, overlay_dirs) {
|
|||
Upper->addDirectory("/upper-only");
|
||||
|
||||
// non-merged paths should be the same
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status1 = Lower->status("/lower-only"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status2 = O->status("/lower-only"));
|
||||
Status1 = Lower->status("/lower-only");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status1.getError());
|
||||
Status2 = O->status("/lower-only");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status2.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status1->equivalent(*Status2));
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status1 = Lower->status("/lower-only"));
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status2 = O->status("/lower-only"));
|
||||
Status1 = Lower->status("/lower-only");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status1.getError());
|
||||
Status2 = O->status("/lower-only");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status2.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Status1->equivalent(*Status2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -190,14 +205,17 @@ TEST(VirtualFileSystemTest, permissions) {
|
|||
ErrorOr<vfs::Status> Status((error_code()));
|
||||
Lower->addDirectory("/both", sys::fs::owner_read);
|
||||
Upper->addDirectory("/both", sys::fs::owner_all | sys::fs::group_read);
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = O->status("/both"));
|
||||
Status = O->status("/both");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0740, Status->getPermissions());
|
||||
|
||||
// permissions (as usual) are not recursively applied
|
||||
Lower->addRegularFile("/both/foo", sys::fs::owner_read);
|
||||
Upper->addRegularFile("/both/bar", sys::fs::owner_write);
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = O->status("/both/foo"));
|
||||
Status = O->status("/both/foo");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0400, Status->getPermissions());
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(Status = O->status("/both/bar"));
|
||||
Status = O->status("/both/bar");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(errc::success, Status.getError());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0200, Status->getPermissions());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue