forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Fix crash when trying to pack-expand a GNU statement expression.
We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile. For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing. llvm-svn: 324160
This commit is contained in:
parent
35eb6c856a
commit
6eb9b9e593
|
@ -55,13 +55,17 @@ namespace sema {
|
|||
/// parsed.
|
||||
class CompoundScopeInfo {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
CompoundScopeInfo()
|
||||
: HasEmptyLoopBodies(false) { }
|
||||
CompoundScopeInfo(bool IsStmtExpr)
|
||||
: HasEmptyLoopBodies(false), IsStmtExpr(IsStmtExpr) { }
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether this compound stamement contains `for' or `while' loops
|
||||
/// with empty bodies.
|
||||
bool HasEmptyLoopBodies;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether this compound statement corresponds to a GNU statement
|
||||
/// expression.
|
||||
bool IsStmtExpr;
|
||||
|
||||
void setHasEmptyLoopBodies() {
|
||||
HasEmptyLoopBodies = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ public:
|
|||
getCurFunction()->recordUseOfWeak(E, IsRead);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void PushCompoundScope();
|
||||
void PushCompoundScope(bool IsStmtExpr);
|
||||
void PopCompoundScope();
|
||||
|
||||
sema::CompoundScopeInfo &getCurCompoundScope() const;
|
||||
|
@ -3667,7 +3667,7 @@ public:
|
|||
StmtResult ActOnNullStmt(SourceLocation SemiLoc,
|
||||
bool HasLeadingEmptyMacro = false);
|
||||
|
||||
void ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
void ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt(bool IsStmtExpr);
|
||||
void ActOnFinishOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
StmtResult ActOnCompoundStmt(SourceLocation L, SourceLocation R,
|
||||
ArrayRef<Stmt *> Elts, bool isStmtExpr);
|
||||
|
@ -3675,8 +3675,8 @@ public:
|
|||
/// \brief A RAII object to enter scope of a compound statement.
|
||||
class CompoundScopeRAII {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
CompoundScopeRAII(Sema &S): S(S) {
|
||||
S.ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
CompoundScopeRAII(Sema &S, bool IsStmtExpr = false) : S(S) {
|
||||
S.ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt(IsStmtExpr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
~CompoundScopeRAII() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1080,21 +1080,18 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseOpenMPDeclarativeOrExecutableDirective(
|
|||
StmtResult AssociatedStmt;
|
||||
if (HasAssociatedStatement) {
|
||||
// The body is a block scope like in Lambdas and Blocks.
|
||||
Sema::CompoundScopeRAII CompoundScope(Actions);
|
||||
Actions.ActOnOpenMPRegionStart(DKind, getCurScope());
|
||||
Actions.ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
// Parse statement
|
||||
AssociatedStmt = ParseStatement();
|
||||
Actions.ActOnFinishOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
// FIXME: We create a bogus CompoundStmt scope to hold the contents of
|
||||
// the captured region. Code elsewhere assumes that any FunctionScopeInfo
|
||||
// should have at least one compound statement scope within it.
|
||||
AssociatedStmt = (Sema::CompoundScopeRAII(Actions), ParseStatement());
|
||||
AssociatedStmt = Actions.ActOnOpenMPRegionEnd(AssociatedStmt, Clauses);
|
||||
} else if (DKind == OMPD_target_update || DKind == OMPD_target_enter_data ||
|
||||
DKind == OMPD_target_exit_data) {
|
||||
Sema::CompoundScopeRAII CompoundScope(Actions);
|
||||
Actions.ActOnOpenMPRegionStart(DKind, getCurScope());
|
||||
Actions.ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
AssociatedStmt =
|
||||
Actions.ActOnCompoundStmt(Loc, Loc, llvm::None, /*isStmtExpr=*/false);
|
||||
Actions.ActOnFinishOfCompoundStmt();
|
||||
AssociatedStmt = (Sema::CompoundScopeRAII(Actions),
|
||||
Actions.ActOnCompoundStmt(Loc, Loc, llvm::None,
|
||||
/*isStmtExpr=*/false));
|
||||
AssociatedStmt = Actions.ActOnOpenMPRegionEnd(AssociatedStmt, Clauses);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Directive = Actions.ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseCompoundStatementBody(bool isStmtExpr) {
|
|||
if (T.consumeOpen())
|
||||
return StmtError();
|
||||
|
||||
Sema::CompoundScopeRAII CompoundScope(Actions);
|
||||
Sema::CompoundScopeRAII CompoundScope(Actions, isStmtExpr);
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse any pragmas at the beginning of the compound statement.
|
||||
ParseCompoundStatementLeadingPragmas();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1393,8 +1393,8 @@ void Sema::PopFunctionScopeInfo(const AnalysisBasedWarnings::Policy *WP,
|
|||
delete Scope;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Sema::PushCompoundScope() {
|
||||
getCurFunction()->CompoundScopes.push_back(CompoundScopeInfo());
|
||||
void Sema::PushCompoundScope(bool IsStmtExpr) {
|
||||
getCurFunction()->CompoundScopes.push_back(CompoundScopeInfo(IsStmtExpr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Sema::PopCompoundScope() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ void Sema::DiagnoseUnusedExprResult(const Stmt *S) {
|
|||
DiagRuntimeBehavior(Loc, nullptr, PDiag(DiagID) << R1 << R2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Sema::ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt() {
|
||||
PushCompoundScope();
|
||||
void Sema::ActOnStartOfCompoundStmt(bool IsStmtExpr) {
|
||||
PushCompoundScope(IsStmtExpr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Sema::ActOnFinishOfCompoundStmt() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -314,8 +314,18 @@ Sema::DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPacks(SourceLocation Loc,
|
|||
// later.
|
||||
SmallVector<UnexpandedParameterPack, 4> LambdaParamPackReferences;
|
||||
for (unsigned N = FunctionScopes.size(); N; --N) {
|
||||
if (sema::LambdaScopeInfo *LSI =
|
||||
dyn_cast<sema::LambdaScopeInfo>(FunctionScopes[N-1])) {
|
||||
sema::FunctionScopeInfo *Func = FunctionScopes[N-1];
|
||||
// We do not permit pack expansion that would duplicate a statement
|
||||
// expression, not even within a lambda.
|
||||
// FIXME: We could probably support this for statement expressions that do
|
||||
// not contain labels, and for pack expansions that expand both the stmt
|
||||
// expr and the enclosing lambda.
|
||||
if (std::any_of(
|
||||
Func->CompoundScopes.begin(), Func->CompoundScopes.end(),
|
||||
[](sema::CompoundScopeInfo &CSI) { return CSI.IsStmtExpr; }))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (auto *LSI = dyn_cast<sema::LambdaScopeInfo>(Func)) {
|
||||
if (N == FunctionScopes.size()) {
|
||||
for (auto &Param : Unexpanded) {
|
||||
auto *PD = dyn_cast_or_null<ParmVarDecl>(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We could in principle support cases like this (particularly, cases
|
||||
// where the statement-expression contains no labels).
|
||||
template <typename... T> void f1() {
|
||||
int arr[] = {
|
||||
({
|
||||
T(); // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
|
||||
}) ... // expected-error {{does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: The error for this isn't ideal; it'd be preferable to say that pack
|
||||
// expansion of a statement expression is not permitted.
|
||||
template <typename... T> void f2() {
|
||||
[] {
|
||||
int arr[] = {
|
||||
T() + ({
|
||||
foo:
|
||||
T t; // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
|
||||
goto foo;
|
||||
0;
|
||||
}) ...
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename... T> void f3() {
|
||||
({
|
||||
int arr[] = {
|
||||
[] {
|
||||
foo:
|
||||
T t; // OK, expanded within compound statement
|
||||
goto foo;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} ...
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue