forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[X86] Call removeDeadNode when we're done doing custom isel for mul, div and test
Summary: Once we've done our custom isel for these nodes, I think we should be calling removeDeadNode to prune them out of the DAG. Table driven isel ultimately either calls morphNodeTo which modifies a node and doesn't leave dead nodes. Or it emits new nodes and then calls removeDeadNode as part of Opc_CompleteMatch. If you run a simple multiply test case like this through llc with -debug you'll see a umul_lohi node get printed as part of the dump for Instruction Selection ends. ``` define i64 @foo(i64 %a, i64 %b) local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %conv = zext i64 %a to i128 %conv1 = zext i64 %b to i128 %mul = mul nuw nsw i128 %conv1, %conv %shr = lshr i128 %mul, 64 %conv2 = trunc i128 %shr to i64 ret i64 %conv2 } ``` Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi, guyblank, niravd Reviewed By: niravd Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37547 llvm-svn: 312857
This commit is contained in:
parent
63c5047a4e
commit
6bed9de3d5
|
@ -2612,6 +2612,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "=> "; ResHi.getNode()->dump(CurDAG); dbgs() << '\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2796,6 +2797,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, 1), Result);
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "=> "; Result.getNode()->dump(CurDAG); dbgs() << '\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2854,6 +2856,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
// one, do not call ReplaceAllUsesWith.
|
||||
ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, (Opcode == X86ISD::SUB ? 1 : 0)),
|
||||
SDValue(NewNode, 0));
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2889,6 +2892,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
// one, do not call ReplaceAllUsesWith.
|
||||
ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, (Opcode == X86ISD::SUB ? 1 : 0)),
|
||||
SDValue(NewNode, 0));
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2909,6 +2913,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
// one, do not call ReplaceAllUsesWith.
|
||||
ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, (Opcode == X86ISD::SUB ? 1 : 0)),
|
||||
SDValue(NewNode, 0));
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2929,6 +2934,7 @@ void X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node) {
|
|||
// one, do not call ReplaceAllUsesWith.
|
||||
ReplaceUses(SDValue(Node, (Opcode == X86ISD::SUB ? 1 : 0)),
|
||||
SDValue(NewNode, 0));
|
||||
CurDAG->RemoveDeadNode(Node);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue