forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[AMDGPU] SIRemoveShortExecBranches should not remove branches exiting loops
Summary: Check that a s_cbranch_execz is not a loop exit before removing it. As the pass is generating infinite loops. Reviewers: cdevadas, arsenm, nhaehnle Reviewed By: nhaehnle Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits, dstuttard, foad Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72997
This commit is contained in:
parent
e53a9d96e6
commit
6b4b3e2856
|
@ -88,10 +88,9 @@ bool SIRemoveShortExecBranches::mustRetainExeczBranch(
|
|||
for (MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator I = MBB.begin(), E = MBB.end();
|
||||
I != E; ++I) {
|
||||
// When a uniform loop is inside non-uniform control flow, the branch
|
||||
// leaving the loop might be an S_CBRANCH_VCCNZ, which is never taken
|
||||
// when EXEC = 0. We should skip the loop lest it becomes infinite.
|
||||
if (I->getOpcode() == AMDGPU::S_CBRANCH_VCCNZ ||
|
||||
I->getOpcode() == AMDGPU::S_CBRANCH_VCCZ)
|
||||
// leaving the loop might never be taken when EXEC = 0.
|
||||
// Hence we should retain cbranch out of the loop lest it become infinite.
|
||||
if (I->isConditionalBranch())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (TII->hasUnwantedEffectsWhenEXECEmpty(*I))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ define amdgpu_ps void @main(i32, float) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_and_b64 s[8:9], s[8:9], exec
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_or_b64 s[4:5], s[4:5], s[8:9]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_andn2_b64 exec, exec, s[2:3]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_cbranch_execz BB0_6
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: BB0_3: ; %loop
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ; =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_or_b64 s[6:7], s[6:7], exec
|
||||
|
@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ define amdgpu_ps void @main(i32, float) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_add_i32 s0, s0, 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_xor_b64 s[6:7], exec, -1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_branch BB0_1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ; %bb.6: ; %Flow2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: BB0_6: ; %Flow2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_or_b64 exec, exec, s[2:3]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, 0
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: s_and_saveexec_b64 s[0:1], s[4:5]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ declare i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x() nounwind readnone
|
|||
; SI-NEXT: s_mov_b64 {{s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]}}, 0
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: s_and_saveexec_b64 [[SAVE1:s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], vcc
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: s_xor_b64 [[SAVE2:s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], exec, [[SAVE1]]
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: s_cbranch_execz [[FLOW_BB:BB[0-9]+_[0-9]+]]
|
||||
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: ; %bb.{{[0-9]+}}: ; %LeafBlock3
|
||||
; SI: s_mov_b64 s[{{[0-9]:[0-9]}}], -1
|
||||
|
@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ declare i32 @llvm.amdgcn.workitem.id.x() nounwind readnone
|
|||
; SI-NEXT: s_cbranch_execnz
|
||||
|
||||
; v_mov should be after exec modification
|
||||
; SI: ; %bb.{{[0-9]+}}:
|
||||
; SI: [[FLOW_BB]]:
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: s_or_saveexec_b64 [[SAVE3:s\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], [[SAVE2]]
|
||||
; SI-NEXT: s_xor_b64 exec, exec, [[SAVE3]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue