[NFC][loop-idiom] Rename Stores to IgnoredInsts; Fix a typo

When dealing with memmove, we also add the load instruction to the ignored
instructions list passed to `mayLoopAccessLocation`. Renaming "Stores" to
"IgnoredInsts" to be more precise.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108275
This commit is contained in:
Han Zhu 2021-08-17 23:39:29 -07:00
parent d9873711cb
commit 687f046c97
1 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopMemCpy(MemCpyInst *MCI,
return OptimizationRemarkMissed(DEBUG_TYPE, "SizeStrideUnequal", MCI)
<< ore::NV("Inst", "memcpy") << " in "
<< ore::NV("Function", MCI->getFunction())
<< " function will not be hoised: "
<< " function will not be hoisted: "
<< ore::NV("Reason", "memcpy size is not equal to stride");
});
return false;
@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static bool
mayLoopAccessLocation(Value *Ptr, ModRefInfo Access, Loop *L,
const SCEV *BECount, const SCEV *StoreSizeSCEV,
AliasAnalysis &AA,
SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &IgnoredStores) {
SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &IgnoredInsts) {
// Get the location that may be stored across the loop. Since the access is
// strided positively through memory, we say that the modified location starts
// at the pointer and has infinite size.
@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ mayLoopAccessLocation(Value *Ptr, ModRefInfo Access, Loop *L,
for (Loop::block_iterator BI = L->block_begin(), E = L->block_end(); BI != E;
++BI)
for (Instruction &I : **BI)
if (IgnoredStores.count(&I) == 0 &&
if (IgnoredInsts.count(&I) == 0 &&
isModOrRefSet(
intersectModRef(AA.getModRefInfo(&I, StoreLoc), Access)))
return true;
@ -1300,19 +1300,19 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStoreOfLoopLoad(
// the return value will read this comment, and leave them alone.
Changed = true;
SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 2> Stores;
Stores.insert(TheStore);
SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 2> IgnoredInsts;
IgnoredInsts.insert(TheStore);
bool IsMemCpy = isa<MemCpyInst>(TheStore);
const StringRef InstRemark = IsMemCpy ? "memcpy" : "load and store";
bool UseMemMove =
mayLoopAccessLocation(StoreBasePtr, ModRefInfo::ModRef, CurLoop, BECount,
StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, Stores);
StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, IgnoredInsts);
if (UseMemMove) {
Stores.insert(TheLoad);
IgnoredInsts.insert(TheLoad);
if (mayLoopAccessLocation(StoreBasePtr, ModRefInfo::ModRef, CurLoop,
BECount, StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, Stores)) {
BECount, StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, IgnoredInsts)) {
ORE.emit([&]() {
return OptimizationRemarkMissed(DEBUG_TYPE, "LoopMayAccessStore",
TheStore)
@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStoreOfLoopLoad(
});
return Changed;
}
Stores.erase(TheLoad);
IgnoredInsts.erase(TheLoad);
}
const SCEV *LdStart = LoadEv->getStart();
@ -1342,9 +1342,9 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStoreOfLoopLoad(
// If the store is a memcpy instruction, we must check if it will write to
// the load memory locations. So remove it from the ignored stores.
if (IsMemCpy)
Stores.erase(TheStore);
IgnoredInsts.erase(TheStore);
if (mayLoopAccessLocation(LoadBasePtr, ModRefInfo::Mod, CurLoop, BECount,
StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, Stores)) {
StoreSizeSCEV, *AA, IgnoredInsts)) {
ORE.emit([&]() {
return OptimizationRemarkMissed(DEBUG_TYPE, "LoopMayAccessLoad", TheLoad)
<< ore::NV("Inst", InstRemark) << " in "
@ -1442,8 +1442,8 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStoreOfLoopLoad(
<< " function";
});
// Okay, the memcpy has been formed. Zap the original store and anything that
// feeds into it.
// Okay, a new call to memcpy/memmove has been formed. Zap the original store
// and anything that feeds into it.
if (MSSAU)
MSSAU->removeMemoryAccess(TheStore, true);
deleteDeadInstruction(TheStore);