forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Print vectorization analysis when loop hint is specified.
This patche and a related llvm patch solve the problem of having to explicitly enable analysis when specifying a loop hint pragma to get the diagnostics. Passing AlwasyPrint as the pass name (see below) causes the front-end to print the diagnostic if the user has specified '-Rpass-analysis' without an '=<target-pass>’. Users of loop hints can pass that compiler option without having to specify the pass and they will get diagnostics for only those loops with loop hints. llvm-svn: 244556
This commit is contained in:
parent
c94d6ad241
commit
65061a293b
|
@ -495,33 +495,39 @@ void BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler(
|
|||
|
||||
void BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler(
|
||||
const llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationRemarkAnalysis &D) {
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active only if the -Rpass-analysis
|
||||
// flag has a regular expression that matches the name of the pass
|
||||
// name in \p D.
|
||||
if (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName()))
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active if the pass name is set to
|
||||
// llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwasyPrint or if the -Rpass-analysis flag has a
|
||||
// regular expression that matches the name of the pass name in \p D.
|
||||
|
||||
if (D.getPassName() == llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwaysPrint ||
|
||||
(CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName())))
|
||||
EmitOptimizationMessage(
|
||||
D, diag::remark_fe_backend_optimization_remark_analysis);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler(
|
||||
const llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationRemarkAnalysisFPCommute &D) {
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active only if the -Rpass-analysis
|
||||
// flag has a regular expression that matches the name of the pass
|
||||
// name in \p D.
|
||||
if (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName()))
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active if the pass name is set to
|
||||
// llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwasyPrint or if the -Rpass-analysis flag has a
|
||||
// regular expression that matches the name of the pass name in \p D.
|
||||
|
||||
if (D.getPassName() == llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwaysPrint ||
|
||||
(CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName())))
|
||||
EmitOptimizationMessage(
|
||||
D, diag::remark_fe_backend_optimization_remark_analysis_fpcommute);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler(
|
||||
const llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationRemarkAnalysisAliasing &D) {
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active only if the -Rpass-analysis
|
||||
// flag has a regular expression that matches the name of the pass
|
||||
// name in \p D.
|
||||
if (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName()))
|
||||
// Optimization analysis remarks are active if the pass name is set to
|
||||
// llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwasyPrint or if the -Rpass-analysis flag has a
|
||||
// regular expression that matches the name of the pass name in \p D.
|
||||
|
||||
if (D.getPassName() == llvm::DiagnosticInfo::AlwaysPrint ||
|
||||
(CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern &&
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.OptimizationRemarkAnalysisPattern->match(D.getPassName())))
|
||||
EmitOptimizationMessage(
|
||||
D, diag::remark_fe_backend_optimization_remark_analysis_aliasing);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang -O1 -fvectorize -emit-llvm -Rpass-analysis -S %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RPASS
|
||||
// RUN: %clang -O1 -fvectorize -emit-llvm -S %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
// RPASS: {{.*}}:21:1: remark: loop not vectorized: loop contains a switch statement
|
||||
// CHECK-NOT: {{.*}}:21:1: remark: loop not vectorized: loop contains a switch statement
|
||||
|
||||
double foo(int N, int *Array) {
|
||||
double v = 0.0;
|
||||
|
||||
#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
|
||||
switch(Array[i]) {
|
||||
case 0: v += 1.0f; break;
|
||||
case 1: v -= 0.5f; break;
|
||||
case 2: v *= 2.0f; break;
|
||||
default: v = 0.0f;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return v;
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue