forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Add -Wswitch-enum-redundant-default.
This warning acts as the complement to the main -Wswitch-enum warning (which warns whenever a switch over enum without a default doesn't cover all values of the enum) & has been an an-doc coding convention in LLVM and Clang in my experience. The purpose is to ensure there's never a "dead" default in a switch-over-enum because this would hide future -Wswitch-enum errors. The name warning has a separate flag name so it can be disabled but it's grouped under -Wswitch-enum & is on-by-default because of this. The existing violations of this rule in test cases have had the warning disabled & I've added a specific test for the new behavior (many negative cases already exist in the same test file - and none regressed - so I didn't add more). Reviewed by Ted Kremenek ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120116/051690.html ) llvm-svn: 148640
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb6ecdf27c
commit
645ae0ce10
|
@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ def InvalidOffsetof : DiagGroup<"invalid-offsetof">;
|
|||
def : DiagGroup<"strict-prototypes">;
|
||||
def StrictSelector : DiagGroup<"strict-selector-match">;
|
||||
def MethodDuplicate : DiagGroup<"duplicate-method-match">;
|
||||
def SwitchEnum : DiagGroup<"switch-enum">;
|
||||
def SwitchEnumRedundantDefault : DiagGroup<"switch-enum-redundant-default">;
|
||||
def SwitchEnum : DiagGroup<"switch-enum", [SwitchEnumRedundantDefault]>;
|
||||
def Switch : DiagGroup<"switch", [SwitchEnum]>;
|
||||
def Trigraphs : DiagGroup<"trigraphs">;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4946,19 +4946,22 @@ def warn_case_empty_range : Warning<"empty case range specified">;
|
|||
def warn_missing_case_for_condition :
|
||||
Warning<"no case matching constant switch condition '%0'">;
|
||||
def warn_missing_case1 : Warning<"enumeration value %0 not handled in switch">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"switch-enum"> >;
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnum>;
|
||||
def warn_missing_case2 : Warning<
|
||||
"enumeration values %0 and %1 not handled in switch">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"switch-enum"> >;
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnum>;
|
||||
def warn_missing_case3 : Warning<
|
||||
"enumeration values %0, %1, and %2 not handled in switch">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"switch-enum"> >;
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnum>;
|
||||
def warn_missing_cases : Warning<
|
||||
"%0 enumeration values not handled in switch: %1, %2, %3...">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"switch-enum"> >;
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnum>;
|
||||
def warn_unreachable_default : Warning<
|
||||
"default is unreachable as all enumeration values are accounted for">,
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnumRedundantDefault>;
|
||||
|
||||
def warn_not_in_enum : Warning<"case value not in enumerated type %0">,
|
||||
InGroup<DiagGroup<"switch-enum"> >;
|
||||
InGroup<SwitchEnum>;
|
||||
def err_typecheck_statement_requires_scalar : Error<
|
||||
"statement requires expression of scalar type (%0 invalid)">;
|
||||
def err_typecheck_statement_requires_integer : Error<
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -924,11 +924,17 @@ Sema::ActOnFinishSwitchStmt(SourceLocation SwitchLoc, Stmt *Switch,
|
|||
|
||||
if (RI == CaseRanges.end() || EI->first < RI->first) {
|
||||
hasCasesNotInSwitch = true;
|
||||
if (!TheDefaultStmt)
|
||||
UnhandledNames.push_back(EI->second->getDeclName());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (TheDefaultStmt) {
|
||||
if (UnhandledNames.size() == 0)
|
||||
Diag(TheDefaultStmt->getDefaultLoc(), diag::warn_unreachable_default);
|
||||
else
|
||||
UnhandledNames.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Produce a nice diagnostic if multiple values aren't handled.
|
||||
switch (UnhandledNames.size()) {
|
||||
case 0: break;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -288,3 +288,12 @@ void test17(int x) {
|
|||
case 0: return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int test18() {
|
||||
enum { A, B } a;
|
||||
switch (a) {
|
||||
case A: return 0;
|
||||
case B: return 1;
|
||||
default: return 2; // expected-warning {{default is unreachable as all enumeration values are accounted for}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang %s -fsyntax-only -Xclang -verify -fblocks -Wunreachable-code -Wno-unused-value
|
||||
// RUN: %clang %s -fsyntax-only -Xclang -verify -fblocks -Wunreachable-code -Wno-unused-value -Wno-switch-enum-redundant-default
|
||||
|
||||
int halt() __attribute__((noreturn));
|
||||
int live();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -Wno-switch-enum-redundant-default %s
|
||||
|
||||
enum E {
|
||||
one,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-unreachable-code
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -verify -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-unreachable-code
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-unreachable-code -Wno-switch-enum-redundant-default
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -verify -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-noreturn -Wno-unreachable-code -Wno-switch-enum-redundant-default
|
||||
|
||||
// A destructor may be marked noreturn and should still influence the CFG.
|
||||
void pr6884_abort() __attribute__((noreturn));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue