[LAA] Change name from addRuntimeCheck to addRuntimeChecks, NFC

This was requested by Hal in D11205.

llvm-svn: 244540

llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h

@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ public:
   /// \brief A memcheck which made up of a pair of grouped pointers.
   ///
   /// These *have* to be const for now, since checks are generated from
-  /// CheckingPtrGroups in LAI::addRuntimeCheck which is a const member
+  /// CheckingPtrGroups in LAI::addRuntimeChecks which is a const member
   /// function.  FIXME: once check-generation is moved inside this class (after
   /// the PtrPartition hack is removed), we could drop const.
   typedef std::pair<const CheckingPtrGroup *, const CheckingPtrGroup *>
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ public:
   /// instruction generated in possibly a sequence of instructions and the
   /// second value is the final comparator value or NULL if no check is needed.
   std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *>
-  addRuntimeCheck(Instruction *Loc) const;
+  addRuntimeChecks(Instruction *Loc) const;
 
   /// \brief Generete the instructions for the checks in \p PointerChecks.
   ///
@@ -504,9 +504,9 @@ public:
   /// instruction generated in possibly a sequence of instructions and the
   /// second value is the final comparator value or NULL if no check is needed.
   std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *>
-  addRuntimeCheck(Instruction *Loc,
-                  const SmallVectorImpl<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck>
-                      &PointerChecks) const;
+  addRuntimeChecks(Instruction *Loc,
+                   const SmallVectorImpl<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck>
+                       &PointerChecks) const;
 
   /// \brief The diagnostics report generated for the analysis.  E.g. why we
   /// couldn't analyze the loop.

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

@@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ static SmallVector<std::pair<PointerBounds, PointerBounds>, 4> expandBounds(
   return ChecksWithBounds;
 }
 
-std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *> LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeCheck(
+std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *> LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeChecks(
     Instruction *Loc,
     const SmallVectorImpl<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck> &PointerChecks)
     const {
@@ -1710,12 +1710,12 @@ std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *> LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeCheck(
   return std::make_pair(FirstInst, Check);
 }
 
-std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *> LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeCheck(
-    Instruction *Loc) const {
+std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *>
+LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeChecks(Instruction *Loc) const {
   if (!PtrRtChecking.Need)
     return std::make_pair(nullptr, nullptr);
 
-  return addRuntimeCheck(Loc, PtrRtChecking.getChecks());
+  return addRuntimeChecks(Loc, PtrRtChecking.getChecks());
 }
 
 LoopAccessInfo::LoopAccessInfo(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE,

llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.cpp

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void LoopVersioning::versionLoop(Pass *P) {
   // Add the memcheck in the original preheader (this is empty initially).
   BasicBlock *MemCheckBB = VersionedLoop->getLoopPreheader();
   std::tie(FirstCheckInst, MemRuntimeCheck) =
-      LAI.addRuntimeCheck(MemCheckBB->getTerminator(), Checks);
+      LAI.addRuntimeChecks(MemCheckBB->getTerminator(), Checks);
   assert(MemRuntimeCheck && "called even though needsAnyChecking = false");
 
   // Rename the block to make the IR more readable.

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp

@@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::createEmptyLoop() {
   // faster.
   Instruction *MemRuntimeCheck;
   std::tie(FirstCheckInst, MemRuntimeCheck) =
-      Legal->getLAI()->addRuntimeCheck(VectorPH->getTerminator());
+      Legal->getLAI()->addRuntimeChecks(VectorPH->getTerminator());
   if (MemRuntimeCheck) {
     AddedSafetyChecks = true;
     // Create a new block containing the memory check.