This was not a lower-switch bug, it was a preselection bug

llvm-svn: 9340
2003-10-21 18:02:17 +00:00 · 2003-10-21 18:02:17 +00:00 · 59607b0a40
parent 8aaa7f77c7
commit 59607b0a40
1 changed files with 0 additions and 16 deletions
--- a/llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2003-10-20-ConstGetOp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/LowerSwitch/2003-10-20-ConstGetOp.ll
@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
 void %main() {
 entry:		; No predecessors!
 	switch uint 1, label %exit [
 		 uint 0, label %label.0
     uint 1, label %label.1
 	]
 label.0:		; preds = %endif.1
 	br label %exit
 label.1:		; preds = %endif.1
  br label %exit
 exit:
 	ret void
 }