forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[X86] Remove an unnecessary 'if' that prevented treating INT64_MAX and -INT64_MAX as power of 2 minus 1 in the multiply expansion code.
Not sure why they were being explicitly excluded, but I believe all the math inside the if works. I changed the absolute value to be uint64_t instead of int64_t so INT64_MIN+1 wouldn't be signed wrap. llvm-svn: 338101
This commit is contained in:
parent
eae4742d81
commit
561e298e29
|
@ -33928,45 +33928,43 @@ static SDValue combineMul(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
|
|||
"Both cases that could cause potential overflows should have "
|
||||
"already been handled.");
|
||||
int64_t SignMulAmt = C->getSExtValue();
|
||||
if ((SignMulAmt != INT64_MIN) && (SignMulAmt != INT64_MAX) &&
|
||||
(SignMulAmt != -INT64_MAX)) {
|
||||
int64_t AbsMulAmt = SignMulAmt < 0 ? -SignMulAmt : SignMulAmt;
|
||||
if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(
|
||||
ISD::ADD, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1), DL,
|
||||
MVT::i8)));
|
||||
// To negate, subtract the number from zero
|
||||
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT,
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewMul);
|
||||
} else if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
// To negate, reverse the operands of the subtract.
|
||||
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0), NewMul);
|
||||
else
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N + 2) => (add (add (shl x, N), x), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N - 2) => (sub (sub (shl x, N), x), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
assert(SignMulAmt != INT64_MIN && "Int min should have been handled!");
|
||||
uint64_t AbsMulAmt = SignMulAmt < 0 ? -SignMulAmt : SignMulAmt;
|
||||
if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(
|
||||
ISD::ADD, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 1), DL,
|
||||
MVT::i8)));
|
||||
// To negate, subtract the number from zero
|
||||
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT,
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(0, DL, VT), NewMul);
|
||||
} else if (isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 1),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
// To negate, reverse the operands of the subtract.
|
||||
if (SignMulAmt < 0)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0), NewMul);
|
||||
else
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N + 2) => (add (add (shl x, N), x), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt - 2),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
} else if (SignMulAmt >= 0 && isPowerOf2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2)) {
|
||||
// (mul x, 2^N - 2) => (sub (sub (shl x, N), x), x)
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, DL, VT, N->getOperand(0),
|
||||
DAG.getConstant(Log2_64(AbsMulAmt + 2),
|
||||
DL, MVT::i8));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
NewMul = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, DL, VT, NewMul, N->getOperand(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -499,8 +499,9 @@ entry:
|
|||
define i64 @testOverflow(i64 %a) {
|
||||
; X64-LABEL: testOverflow:
|
||||
; X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: movabsq $9223372036854775807, %rax # imm = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: imulq %rdi, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: shlq $63, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: subq %rdi, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: retq
|
||||
;
|
||||
; X86-LABEL: testOverflow:
|
||||
|
@ -524,3 +525,27 @@ entry:
|
|||
%tmp3 = mul i64 %a, 9223372036854775807
|
||||
ret i64 %tmp3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i64 @testNegOverflow(i64 %a) {
|
||||
; X64-LABEL: testNegOverflow:
|
||||
; X64: # %bb.0: # %entry
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: shlq $63, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: subq %rax, %rdi
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
|
||||
; X64-NEXT: retq
|
||||
;
|
||||
; X86-LABEL: testNegOverflow:
|
||||
; X86: # %bb.0: # %entry
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: movl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %ecx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: movl $1, %edx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: movl %ecx, %eax
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: mull %edx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: shll $31, %ecx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: addl %ecx, %edx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: addl {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), %edx
|
||||
; X86-NEXT: retl
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%tmp3 = mul i64 %a, -9223372036854775807
|
||||
ret i64 %tmp3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue