maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

[LoopAccessAnalysis][NewPM] Fix tests to work under NPM 

Pin RUN lines with -analyze to legacy PM, add corresponding NPM RUN lines.

Reviewed By: fhahn

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87662
This commit is contained in:
Arthur Eubanks 2020-09-14 18:23:08 -07:00
parent 738bab743b
commit 54e1bf1154
26 changed files with 29 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/backward-dep-different-types.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; In this loop just because we access A through different types (int, float)

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-carried.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; for (unsigned i = 0; i < 100; i++) {

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/forward-loop-independent.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Check that loop-indepedent forward dependences are discovered properly.

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/independent-interleaved.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection=false -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection=false -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -store-to-load-forwarding-conflict-detection=false -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; This test checks that we prove the strided accesses to be independent before

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-for-loop-invariant.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Handle memchecks involving loop-invariant addresses:

5
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-off-by-one-error.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
; RUN: opt -analyze --loop-accesses %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -analyze --loop-accesses %s -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes=print-access-info %s -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; This test verifies run-time boundary check of memory accesses.
; The original loop:
@ -18,7 +19,7 @@
; The loop was vectorized to 4, 32 byte memory access ( <4 x i64> ),
; store a value at *%op touched memory under *%src.
;CHECK: Printing analysis 'Loop Access Analysis' for function 'fastCopy'
;CHECK: function 'fastCopy':
;CHECK: (Low: %op High: (32 + %op))
;CHECK: (Low: %src High: (32 + %src))

3
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/memcheck-wrapping-pointers.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes=print-access-info %s -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/multiple-strides-rt-memory-checks.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; This is the test case from PR26314.

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/non-wrapping-pointer.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; For this loop:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/nullptr.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Test that the loop accesses are proven safe in this case.

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/number-of-memchecks.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pointer-with-unknown-bounds.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/pr31098.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/resort-to-memchecks-only.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; We give up analyzing the dependences in this loop due to non-constant

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/reverse-memcheck-bounds.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; The runtime memory check code and the access grouping

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-no-checks.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; If the arrays don't alias this loop is safe with no memchecks:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/safe-with-dep-distance.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Analyze this loop:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check1.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck -check-prefix=OLDPM %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck -check-prefix=OLDPM %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=NEWPM %s
; Test to confirm LAA will find multiple stores to an invariant address in the

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check2.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Test to confirm LAA will not find store to invariant address.

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/store-to-invariant-check3.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Inner loop has a store to invariant address, but LAA does not need to identify

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/stride-access-dependence.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-1.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; In:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/underlying-objects-2.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; This loop:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks-convergent.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Analyze this loop:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -passes='require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; Analyze this loop:

2
llvm/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/wrapping-pointer-versioning.ll
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LAA
; RUN: opt -basic-aa -loop-accesses -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LAA
; RUN: opt -passes='require<aa>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<aa>,loop(print-access-info)' -aa-pipeline='basic-aa' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LAA
; RUN: opt -loop-versioning -S < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LV