forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[LoopDeletion] Revert 3af8a11
and add test coverage for breakage
This reverts 3af8a11
because I'd used an upper bound where an lower bound was required. The included reduced test case demonstrates the issue.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f40a579bea
commit
523573e90d
|
@ -407,25 +407,18 @@ breakBackedgeIfNotTaken(Loop *L, DominatorTree &DT, ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|||
if (!L->getLoopLatch())
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Unmodified;
|
||||
|
||||
auto *BTC = SE.getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L);
|
||||
if (BTC->isZero()) {
|
||||
// SCEV knows this backedge isn't taken!
|
||||
breakLoopBackedge(L, DT, SE, LI, MSSA);
|
||||
++NumBackedgesBroken;
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Deleted;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If SCEV leaves open the possibility of a zero trip count, see if
|
||||
// symbolically evaluating the first iteration lets us prove the backedge
|
||||
// unreachable.
|
||||
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BTC) || !SE.isKnownNonZero(BTC))
|
||||
if (canProveExitOnFirstIteration(L, DT, LI)) {
|
||||
breakLoopBackedge(L, DT, SE, LI, MSSA);
|
||||
++NumBackedgesBroken;
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Deleted;
|
||||
auto *BTCMax = SE.getConstantMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L);
|
||||
if (!BTCMax->isZero()) {
|
||||
auto *BTC = SE.getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
|
||||
if (!BTC->isZero()) {
|
||||
if (!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BTC) && SE.isKnownNonZero(BTC))
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Unmodified;
|
||||
if (!canProveExitOnFirstIteration(L, DT, LI))
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Unmodified;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Unmodified;
|
||||
}
|
||||
breakLoopBackedge(L, DT, SE, LI, MSSA);
|
||||
return LoopDeletionResult::Deleted;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Remove a loop if it is dead.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
|||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
|
||||
; RUN: opt -loop-deletion -S < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
@a = global i1 false, align 4
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @main() {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @main(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.body:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[D_015:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo()
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[DOTB:%.*]] = load i1, i1* @a, align 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CONV1:%.*]] = select i1 [[DOTB]], i32 -128, i32 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP2_NOT:%.*]] = icmp ugt i32 [[CONV1]], [[D_015]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP2_NOT]], label [[CLEANUP:%.*]], label [[FOR_INC8:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.inc8:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[INC9:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[D_015]], 1
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[EXITCOND_NOT:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[INC9]], 19
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[CLEANUP]]
|
||||
; CHECK: cleanup:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: store i1 true, i1* @a, align 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %for.body
|
||||
|
||||
for.body:
|
||||
%d.015 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc9, %for.inc8 ]
|
||||
call void @foo()
|
||||
%.b = load i1, i1* @a, align 4
|
||||
%conv1 = select i1 %.b, i32 -128, i32 1
|
||||
%cmp2.not = icmp ugt i32 %conv1, %d.015
|
||||
br i1 %cmp2.not, label %cleanup, label %for.inc8
|
||||
|
||||
for.inc8:
|
||||
%inc9 = add nuw nsw i32 %d.015, 1
|
||||
%exitcond.not = icmp eq i32 %inc9, 19
|
||||
br i1 %exitcond.not, label %cleanup, label %for.body
|
||||
|
||||
cleanup:
|
||||
store i1 true, i1* @a, align 4
|
||||
ret i32 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
declare void @foo()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue