Rename feature test for lambda init-captures from cxx_generalized_capture to

cxx_init_capture. "generalized" is neither descriptive nor future-proof. No
compatibility problems expected, since we've never advertised having this
feature.

llvm-svn: 187058
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2013-07-24 17:51:13 +00:00
parent 2e36aaeaa7
commit 4fb09720cf
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -826,9 +826,9 @@ for default initializers in aggregate members is enabled.
C++1y generalized lambda capture
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Use ``__has_feature(cxx_generalized_capture)`` or
``__has_extension(cxx_generalized_capture`` to determine if support for
generalized lambda captures is enabled
Use ``__has_feature(cxx_init_capture)`` or
``__has_extension(cxx_init_capture)`` to determine if support for
lambda captures with explicit initializers is enabled
(for instance, ``[n(0)] { return ++n; }``).
Clang does not yet support this feature.

View File

@ -973,14 +973,14 @@ static bool HasFeature(const Preprocessor &PP, const IdentifierInfo *II) {
.Case("cxx_user_literals", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11)
.Case("cxx_variadic_templates", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11)
// C++1y features
.Case("cxx_aggregate_nsdmi", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
.Case("cxx_binary_literals", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
.Case("cxx_contextual_conversions", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
//.Case("cxx_generalized_capture", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
//.Case("cxx_generic_lambda", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
//.Case("cxx_init_capture", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
.Case("cxx_relaxed_constexpr", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
.Case("cxx_return_type_deduction", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
//.Case("cxx_runtime_array", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
.Case("cxx_aggregate_nsdmi", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
//.Case("cxx_variable_templates", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
// Type traits
.Case("has_nothrow_assign", LangOpts.CPlusPlus)