forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Rename feature test for lambda init-captures from cxx_generalized_capture to
cxx_init_capture. "generalized" is neither descriptive nor future-proof. No compatibility problems expected, since we've never advertised having this feature. llvm-svn: 187058
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e36aaeaa7
commit
4fb09720cf
|
@ -826,9 +826,9 @@ for default initializers in aggregate members is enabled.
|
|||
C++1y generalized lambda capture
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Use ``__has_feature(cxx_generalized_capture)`` or
|
||||
``__has_extension(cxx_generalized_capture`` to determine if support for
|
||||
generalized lambda captures is enabled
|
||||
Use ``__has_feature(cxx_init_capture)`` or
|
||||
``__has_extension(cxx_init_capture)`` to determine if support for
|
||||
lambda captures with explicit initializers is enabled
|
||||
(for instance, ``[n(0)] { return ++n; }``).
|
||||
Clang does not yet support this feature.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -973,14 +973,14 @@ static bool HasFeature(const Preprocessor &PP, const IdentifierInfo *II) {
|
|||
.Case("cxx_user_literals", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_variadic_templates", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11)
|
||||
// C++1y features
|
||||
.Case("cxx_aggregate_nsdmi", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_binary_literals", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_contextual_conversions", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
//.Case("cxx_generalized_capture", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
//.Case("cxx_generic_lambda", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
//.Case("cxx_init_capture", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_relaxed_constexpr", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_return_type_deduction", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
//.Case("cxx_runtime_array", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
.Case("cxx_aggregate_nsdmi", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
//.Case("cxx_variable_templates", LangOpts.CPlusPlus1y)
|
||||
// Type traits
|
||||
.Case("has_nothrow_assign", LangOpts.CPlusPlus)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue