forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[InstCombine] Don't limit uses in eraseInstFromFunction()
eraseInstFromFunction() adds the operands of the erased instructions, as those might now be dead as well. However, this is limited to instructions with less than 8 operands. This check doesn't make a lot of sense to me. As the instruction gets removed afterwards, I don't see a potential for anything overly pathological happening here (as we can only add those operands to the worklist once). The impact on CTMark is in the noise. We also have the same code in instruction sinking and don't limit the operand count there. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77325
This commit is contained in:
parent
eec6d87626
commit
4ede730096
|
@ -724,11 +724,10 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
// Make sure that we reprocess all operands now that we reduced their
|
||||
// use counts.
|
||||
if (I.getNumOperands() < 8) {
|
||||
for (Use &Operand : I.operands())
|
||||
if (auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Operand))
|
||||
Worklist.add(Inst);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (Use &Operand : I.operands())
|
||||
if (auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Operand))
|
||||
Worklist.add(Inst);
|
||||
|
||||
Worklist.remove(&I);
|
||||
I.eraseFromParent();
|
||||
MadeIRChange = true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue