Tidy up VSETCC lowering code a bit more by adding an llvm_unreachable and putting an a couple if conditions in a better order.

llvm-svn: 161746
This commit is contained in:
Craig Topper 2012-08-13 03:42:38 +00:00
parent 5145a0d967
commit 4e5eb72735
1 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -8558,7 +8558,7 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerVSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
// 6 - NLE
// 7 - ORD
switch (SetCCOpcode) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown SetCC condition");
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected SETCC condition");
case ISD::SETOEQ:
case ISD::SETEQ: SSECC = 0; break;
case ISD::SETOGT:
@ -8612,11 +8612,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerVSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
// We are handling one of the integer comparisons here. Since SSE only has
// GT and EQ comparisons for integer, swapping operands and multiple
// operations may be required for some comparisons.
unsigned Opc = 0;
unsigned Opc;
bool Swap = false, Invert = false, FlipSigns = false;
switch (SetCCOpcode) {
default: break;
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected SETCC condition");
case ISD::SETNE: Invert = true;
case ISD::SETEQ: Opc = X86ISD::PCMPEQ; break;
case ISD::SETLT: Swap = true;
@ -8633,10 +8633,12 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerVSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
// Check that the operation in question is available (most are plain SSE2,
// but PCMPGTQ and PCMPEQQ have different requirements).
if (Opc == X86ISD::PCMPGT && VT == MVT::v2i64 && !Subtarget->hasSSE42())
if (VT == MVT::v2i64) {
if (Opc == X86ISD::PCMPGT && !Subtarget->hasSSE42())
return SDValue();
if (Opc == X86ISD::PCMPEQ && VT == MVT::v2i64 && !Subtarget->hasSSE41())
if (Opc == X86ISD::PCMPEQ && !Subtarget->hasSSE41())
return SDValue();
}
// Since SSE has no unsigned integer comparisons, we need to flip the sign
// bits of the inputs before performing those operations.