maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Extern darwin-clang_rt.c test to also test targetting ARM ({armv6, armv7} x 

{thumb,no-thumb}).

llvm-svn: 94264
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Dunbar 2010-01-23 00:26:38 +00:00
parent c766b8a1f4
commit 4c823ba358
1 changed files with 90 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

100
clang/utils/OptionalTests/Extra/Runtime/darwin-clang_rt.c
View File

@ -11,6 +11,36 @@
// RUN: export TENFOUR_X86_MACHINE=localhost
// RUN: export TENFIVE_X86_MACHINE=localhost
// RUN: export ARM_MACHINE=localhost
// RUN: export ARM_SYSROOT=$(xcodebuild -sdk iphoneos -version Path)
// RUN: echo iPhoneOS, ARM, v6, thumb
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv6 -mthumb -c %s -o %t.o
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv6 -mthumb -v -Wl,-t,-v -o %t %t.o 1>&2
// RUN: rsync -arv %t $ARM_MACHINE:/tmp/a.out
// RUN: ssh $ARM_MACHINE /tmp/a.out
// RUN: echo
// RUN: echo iPhoneOS, ARM, v6, no-thumb
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv6 -mno-thumb -c %s -o %t.o
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv6 -mno-thumb -v -Wl,-t,-v -o %t %t.o 1>&2
// RUN: rsync -arv %t $ARM_MACHINE:/tmp/a.out
// RUN: ssh $ARM_MACHINE /tmp/a.out
// RUN: echo
// RUN: echo iPhoneOS, ARM, v7, thumb
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv7 -mthumb -c %s -o %t.o
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv7 -mthumb -v -Wl,-t,-v -o %t %t.o 1>&2
// RUN: rsync -arv %t $ARM_MACHINE:/tmp/a.out
// RUN: ssh $ARM_MACHINE /tmp/a.out
// RUN: echo
// RUN: echo iPhoneOS, ARM, v7, no-thumb
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv7 -mno-thumb -c %s -o %t.o
// RUN: %clang -isysroot $ARM_SYSROOT -arch armv7 -mno-thumb -v -Wl,-t,-v -o %t %t.o 1>&2
// RUN: rsync -arv %t $ARM_MACHINE:/tmp/a.out
// RUN: ssh $ARM_MACHINE /tmp/a.out
// RUN: echo
// RUN: echo 10.4, i386
// RUN: %clang -arch i386 -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -c %s -o %t.o
@ -179,17 +209,33 @@ long double _Complex __mulxc3(long double a, long double b,
long double _Complex __divxc3(long double a, long double b,
long double c, long double d);
#ifndef __arm
#define HAS_LONG_DOUBLE
#endif
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
du_int du_tmp;
struct utsname name;
unsigned target = __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__;
#ifdef __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__
const char *target_name = "OS X";
unsigned target_version = __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__;
unsigned target_maj = target_version / 100;
unsigned target_min = (target_version / 10) % 10;
unsigned target_micro = target_version % 10;
#else
const char *target_name = "iPhoneOS";
unsigned target_version = __ENVIRONMENT_IPHONE_OS_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__;
unsigned target_maj = target_version / 10000;
unsigned target_min = (target_version / 100) % 100;
unsigned target_micro = target_version % 100;
#endif
if (uname(&name))
return 1;
fprintf(stderr, "%s: clang_rt test:\n", argv[0]);
fprintf(stderr, " target : %d.%d.%d\n\n", target/100, (target/10) % 10,
target % 10);
fprintf(stderr, " target : %s %d.%d.%d\n\n", target_name,
target_maj, target_min, target_micro);
fprintf(stderr, " sysname : %s\n", name.sysname);
fprintf(stderr, " nodename: %s\n", name.nodename);
fprintf(stderr, " release : %s\n", name.release);
@ -229,28 +275,62 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
assert(__ucmpdi2(3, 2) == 2);
assert(__fixsfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixdfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixxfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunssfsi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunsdfsi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunsxfsi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunssfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunsdfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunsxfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__floatdisf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatdidf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatdixf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatundisf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatundidf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatundixf(2) == 2);
assert(__powisf2(2.0, 2) == 4.0);
assert(__powidf2(2.0, 2) == 4.0);
assert(__powixf2(2.0, 2) == 4.0);
// FIXME: Clang/LLVM seems to be miscompiling _Complex currently, probably an
// ABI issue.
#ifndef __arm
{
_Complex float a = __mulsc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0);
_Complex float b = (-12.0 + 16.0j);
fprintf(stderr, "a: (%f + %f), b: (%f + %f)\n",
__real a, __imag a, __real b, __imag b);
}
assert(__mulsc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (-12.0 + 16.0j));
assert(__muldc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (-12.0 + 16.0j));
assert(__mulxc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (-12.0 + 16.0j));
assert(__divsc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (0.25 + 0j));
assert(__divdc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (0.25 + 0j));
#endif
#ifdef HAS_LONG_DOUBLE
assert(__divxc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (0.25 + 0j));
assert(__fixunsxfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixunsxfsi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__fixxfdi(2.0) == 2);
assert(__floatdixf(2) == 2.0);
assert(__floatundixf(2) == 2);
assert(__mulxc3(1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0) == (-12.0 + 16.0j));
assert(__powixf2(2.0, 2) == 4.0);
#endif
// Test some calls which are used on armv6/thumb. The calls/prototypes are
// fake, it would be nice to test correctness, but mostly we just want to
// make sure we resolve symbols correctly.
#if defined(__arm) && defined(__ARM_ARCH_6K__) && defined(__thumb__)
if (argc == 100) {
extern void __restore_vfp_d8_d15_regs(void), __save_vfp_d8_d15_regs(void);
extern void __switch8(void), __switchu8(void),
__switch16(void), __switch32(void);
extern void __addsf3vfp(void);
__addsf3vfp();
__restore_vfp_d8_d15_regs();
__save_vfp_d8_d15_regs();
__switch8();
__switchu8();
__switch16();
__switch32();
}
#endif
fprintf(stderr, " OK!\n");