Reintroduce r67870 (rval ref overloading), since I can't reproduce any test failures on i386 or x86_64. If this fails for someone, please contact me.

llvm-svn: 67999

clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp

@@ -2023,6 +2023,18 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
 
   //     -- If the initializer expression
 
+  // Rvalue references cannot bind to lvalues (N2812).
+  // There is absolutely no situation where they can. In particular, note that
+  // this is ill-formed, even if B has a user-defined conversion to A&&:
+  //   B b;
+  //   A&& r = b;
+  if (isRValRef && InitLvalue == Expr::LV_Valid) {
+    if (!ICS)
+      Diag(Init->getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::err_lvalue_to_rvalue_ref)
+        << Init->getSourceRange();
+    return true;
+  }
+
   bool BindsDirectly = false;
   //       -- is an lvalue (but is not a bit-field), and “cv1 T1” is
   //          reference-compatible with “cv2 T2,” or
@@ -2033,14 +2045,6 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
       RefRelationship >= Ref_Compatible_With_Added_Qualification) {
     BindsDirectly = true;
 
-    // Rvalue references cannot bind to lvalues (N2812).
-    if (isRValRef) {
-      if (!ICS)
-        Diag(Init->getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::err_lvalue_to_rvalue_ref)
-          << Init->getSourceRange();
-      return true;
-    }
-
     if (ICS) {
       // C++ [over.ics.ref]p1:
       //   When a parameter of reference type binds directly (8.5.3)
@@ -2057,6 +2061,7 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
       ICS->Standard.ToTypePtr = T1.getAsOpaquePtr();
       ICS->Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
       ICS->Standard.DirectBinding = true;
+      ICS->Standard.RRefBinding = false;
 
       // Nothing more to do: the inaccessibility/ambiguity check for
       // derived-to-base conversions is suppressed when we're
@@ -2164,7 +2169,8 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
   }
 
   //     -- Otherwise, the reference shall be to a non-volatile const
-  //        type (i.e., cv1 shall be const), or shall be an rvalue reference.
+  //        type (i.e., cv1 shall be const), or the reference shall be an
+  //        rvalue reference and the initializer expression shall be an rvalue.
   if (!isRValRef && T1.getCVRQualifiers() != QualType::Const) {
     if (!ICS)
       Diag(Init->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
@@ -2193,7 +2199,7 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
   //          shall be callable whether or not the copy is actually
   //          done.
   //
-  // Note that C++0x [dcl.ref.init]p5 takes away this implementation
+  // Note that C++0x [dcl.init.ref]p5 takes away this implementation
   // freedom, so we will always take the first option and never build
   // a temporary in this case. FIXME: We will, however, have to check
   // for the presence of a copy constructor in C++98/03 mode.
@@ -2207,7 +2213,8 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
       ICS->Standard.FromTypePtr = T2.getAsOpaquePtr();
       ICS->Standard.ToTypePtr = T1.getAsOpaquePtr();
       ICS->Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
-      ICS->Standard.DirectBinding = false;      
+      ICS->Standard.DirectBinding = false;
+      ICS->Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
     } else {
       // FIXME: Binding to a subobject of the rvalue is going to require
       // more AST annotation than this.
@@ -2252,18 +2259,27 @@ Sema::CheckReferenceInit(Expr *&Init, QualType &DeclType,
 
   // Actually try to convert the initializer to T1.
   if (ICS) {
-    /// C++ [over.ics.ref]p2:
+    // C++ [over.ics.ref]p2:
-    /// 
+    // 
-    ///   When a parameter of reference type is not bound directly to
+    //   When a parameter of reference type is not bound directly to
-    ///   an argument expression, the conversion sequence is the one
+    //   an argument expression, the conversion sequence is the one
-    ///   required to convert the argument expression to the
+    //   required to convert the argument expression to the
-    ///   underlying type of the reference according to
+    //   underlying type of the reference according to
-    ///   13.3.3.1. Conceptually, this conversion sequence corresponds
+    //   13.3.3.1. Conceptually, this conversion sequence corresponds
-    ///   to copy-initializing a temporary of the underlying type with
+    //   to copy-initializing a temporary of the underlying type with
-    ///   the argument expression. Any difference in top-level
+    //   the argument expression. Any difference in top-level
-    ///   cv-qualification is subsumed by the initialization itself
+    //   cv-qualification is subsumed by the initialization itself
-    ///   and does not constitute a conversion.
+    //   and does not constitute a conversion.
     *ICS = TryImplicitConversion(Init, T1, SuppressUserConversions);
+    // Of course, that's still a reference binding.
+    if (ICS->ConversionKind == ImplicitConversionSequence::StandardConversion) {
+      ICS->Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
+      ICS->Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
+    } else if(ICS->ConversionKind ==
+              ImplicitConversionSequence::UserDefinedConversion) {
+      ICS->UserDefined.After.ReferenceBinding = true;
+      ICS->UserDefined.After.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
+    }
     return ICS->ConversionKind == ImplicitConversionSequence::BadConversion;
   } else {
     return PerformImplicitConversion(Init, T1, "initializing");

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

@@ -1584,18 +1584,17 @@ Sema::CompareStandardConversionSequences(const StandardConversionSequence& SCS1,
     return QualCK;
 
   if (SCS1.ReferenceBinding && SCS2.ReferenceBinding) {
-    QualType T1 = QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(SCS1.ToTypePtr);
-    QualType T2 = QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(SCS2.ToTypePtr);
     // C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3b4:
     //   -- S1 and S2 are reference bindings (8.5.3) and neither refers to an
     //      implicit object parameter of a non-static member function declared
     //      without a ref-qualifier, and S1 binds an rvalue reference to an
     //      rvalue and S2 binds an lvalue reference.
-    // FIXME: We have far too little information for this check. We don't know
+    // FIXME: We don't know if we're dealing with the implicit object parameter,
-    // if the bound object is an rvalue. We don't know if the binding type is
+    // or if the member function in this case has a ref qualifier.
-    // an rvalue or lvalue reference. We don't know if we're dealing with the
+    // (Of course, we don't have ref qualifiers yet.)
-    // implicit object parameter, or if the member function in this case has
+    if (SCS1.RRefBinding != SCS2.RRefBinding)
-    // a ref qualifier.
+      return SCS1.RRefBinding ? ImplicitConversionSequence::Better
+                              : ImplicitConversionSequence::Worse;
 
     // C++ [over.ics.rank]p3b4:
     //   -- S1 and S2 are reference bindings (8.5.3), and the types to
@@ -1603,6 +1602,8 @@ Sema::CompareStandardConversionSequences(const StandardConversionSequence& SCS1,
     //      top-level cv-qualifiers, and the type to which the reference
     //      initialized by S2 refers is more cv-qualified than the type
     //      to which the reference initialized by S1 refers.
+    QualType T1 = QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(SCS1.ToTypePtr);
+    QualType T2 = QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(SCS2.ToTypePtr);
     T1 = Context.getCanonicalType(T1);
     T2 = Context.getCanonicalType(T2);
     if (T1.getUnqualifiedType() == T2.getUnqualifiedType()) {

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.h

@@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ namespace clang {
     /// direct binding (C++ [dcl.init.ref]).
     bool DirectBinding : 1;
 
+    /// RRefBinding - True when this is a reference binding of an rvalue
+    /// reference to an rvalue (C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3b4).
+    bool RRefBinding : 1;
+
     /// FromType - The type that this conversion is converting
     /// from. This is an opaque pointer that can be translated into a
     /// QualType.

clang/test/SemaCXX/rval-references.cpp

@@ -37,14 +37,15 @@ void f() {
   not_int ni2 = over(ret_irr());
 
   int i4 = over2(i1);
-  // not_int ni3 = over2(0); FIXME: this should be well-formed.
+  not_int ni3 = over2(0);
 
   ilr_c1 vilr1 = i1;
   ilr_c2 vilr2 = i1;
 
   conv_to_not_int_rvalue cnir;
-  not_int &&ni4 = cnir;
+  not_int &&ni4 = cnir; // expected-error {{rvalue reference cannot bind to lvalue}}
   not_int &ni5 = cnir; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct not_int' cannot be initialized with a value of type 'struct conv_to_not_int_rvalue'}}
+  not_int &&ni6 = conv_to_not_int_rvalue();
 
 
   try {