forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Revert "[NFCI][IR] ConstantRangeTest: add basic scaffolding for next-gen precision/correctness testing"
This reverts commit 9bcf7b1c7a
.
Breaks build with MSVC.
This commit is contained in:
parent
276f68eace
commit
495a5e94ba
|
@ -59,12 +59,6 @@ static void ForeachNumInConstantRange(const ConstantRange &CR, Fn TestFn) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned GetNumValuesInConstantRange(const ConstantRange &CR) {
|
||||
unsigned NumValues = 0;
|
||||
ForeachNumInConstantRange(CR, [&NumValues](const APInt &) { ++NumValues; });
|
||||
return NumValues;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct OpRangeGathererBase {
|
||||
void account(const APInt &N);
|
||||
ConstantRange getRange();
|
||||
|
@ -113,79 +107,6 @@ struct SignedOpRangeGatherer : public OpRangeGathererBase {
|
|||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct AccumulatedPrecisionData {
|
||||
unsigned NumActualValues;
|
||||
unsigned NumValuesInActualCR;
|
||||
unsigned NumValuesInExactCR;
|
||||
|
||||
// If NumValuesInActualCR and NumValuesInExactCR are identical, and are not
|
||||
// equal to the NumActualValues, then the implementation is
|
||||
// overly conservatively correct, i.e. imprecise.
|
||||
|
||||
void reset() {
|
||||
NumActualValues = 0;
|
||||
NumValuesInActualCR = 0;
|
||||
NumValuesInExactCR = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename OpRangeGathererTy, typename Fn1, typename Fn2>
|
||||
static void TestUnaryOpExhaustive(Fn1 RangeFn, Fn2 IntFn,
|
||||
AccumulatedPrecisionData &Total) {
|
||||
Total.reset();
|
||||
|
||||
constexpr unsigned Bits = 4;
|
||||
|
||||
EnumerateConstantRanges(Bits, [&](const ConstantRange &CR) {
|
||||
// We'll want to record each true new value, for precision testing.
|
||||
SmallDenseSet<APInt, 1 << Bits> ExactValues;
|
||||
|
||||
// What constant range does ConstantRange method return?
|
||||
ConstantRange ActualCR = RangeFn(CR);
|
||||
|
||||
// We'll want to sanity-check the ActualCR, so this will build our own CR.
|
||||
OpRangeGathererTy ExactR(CR.getBitWidth());
|
||||
|
||||
// Let's iterate for each value in the original constant range.
|
||||
ForeachNumInConstantRange(CR, [&](const APInt &N) {
|
||||
// For this singular value, what is the true new value?
|
||||
const APInt NewN = IntFn(N);
|
||||
|
||||
// Constant range provided by ConstantRange method must be conservatively
|
||||
// correct, it must contain the true new value.
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(ActualCR.contains(NewN));
|
||||
|
||||
// Record this true new value in our own constant range.
|
||||
ExactR.account(NewN);
|
||||
|
||||
// And record the new true value itself.
|
||||
ExactValues.insert(NewN);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// So, what range did we grok by exhaustively looking over each value?
|
||||
ConstantRange ExactCR = ExactR.getRange();
|
||||
|
||||
// So, how many new values are there actually, and as per the ranges?
|
||||
unsigned NumActualValues = ExactValues.size();
|
||||
unsigned NumValuesInExactCR = GetNumValuesInConstantRange(ExactCR);
|
||||
unsigned NumValuesInActualCR = GetNumValuesInConstantRange(ActualCR);
|
||||
|
||||
// Ranges should contain at least as much values as there actually was,
|
||||
// but it is possible they will contain extras.
|
||||
EXPECT_GE(NumValuesInExactCR, NumActualValues);
|
||||
EXPECT_GE(NumValuesInActualCR, NumActualValues);
|
||||
|
||||
// We expect that OpRangeGathererTy produces the exactly identical range
|
||||
// to what the ConstantRange method does.
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ExactR.getRange(), ActualCR);
|
||||
|
||||
// For precision testing, accumulate the overall numbers.
|
||||
Total.NumActualValues += NumActualValues;
|
||||
Total.NumValuesInActualCR += NumValuesInActualCR;
|
||||
Total.NumValuesInExactCR += NumValuesInExactCR;
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename Fn1, typename Fn2>
|
||||
static void TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(Fn1 RangeFn, Fn2 IntFn,
|
||||
bool SkipSignedIntMin = false) {
|
||||
|
@ -2479,16 +2400,9 @@ TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, binaryXor) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, binaryNot) {
|
||||
AccumulatedPrecisionData Precision;
|
||||
|
||||
TestUnaryOpExhaustive<UnsignedOpRangeGatherer>(
|
||||
TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(
|
||||
[](const ConstantRange &CR) { return CR.binaryNot(); },
|
||||
[](const APInt &N) { return ~N; }, Precision);
|
||||
// FIXME: the implementation is not precise.
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumActualValues, 1936u);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumValuesInActualCR, 2496u);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumValuesInExactCR, 2496u);
|
||||
|
||||
[](const APInt &N) { return ~N; });
|
||||
TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(
|
||||
[](const ConstantRange &CR) {
|
||||
return CR.binaryXor(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue