Revert "[NFCI][IR] ConstantRangeTest: add basic scaffolding for next-gen precision/correctness testing"

This reverts commit 9bcf7b1c7a.

Breaks build with MSVC.
This commit is contained in:
Reid Kleckner 2020-09-24 16:47:15 -07:00
parent 276f68eace
commit 495a5e94ba
1 changed files with 2 additions and 88 deletions

View File

@ -59,12 +59,6 @@ static void ForeachNumInConstantRange(const ConstantRange &CR, Fn TestFn) {
}
}
unsigned GetNumValuesInConstantRange(const ConstantRange &CR) {
unsigned NumValues = 0;
ForeachNumInConstantRange(CR, [&NumValues](const APInt &) { ++NumValues; });
return NumValues;
}
struct OpRangeGathererBase {
void account(const APInt &N);
ConstantRange getRange();
@ -113,79 +107,6 @@ struct SignedOpRangeGatherer : public OpRangeGathererBase {
}
};
struct AccumulatedPrecisionData {
unsigned NumActualValues;
unsigned NumValuesInActualCR;
unsigned NumValuesInExactCR;
// If NumValuesInActualCR and NumValuesInExactCR are identical, and are not
// equal to the NumActualValues, then the implementation is
// overly conservatively correct, i.e. imprecise.
void reset() {
NumActualValues = 0;
NumValuesInActualCR = 0;
NumValuesInExactCR = 0;
}
};
template <typename OpRangeGathererTy, typename Fn1, typename Fn2>
static void TestUnaryOpExhaustive(Fn1 RangeFn, Fn2 IntFn,
AccumulatedPrecisionData &Total) {
Total.reset();
constexpr unsigned Bits = 4;
EnumerateConstantRanges(Bits, [&](const ConstantRange &CR) {
// We'll want to record each true new value, for precision testing.
SmallDenseSet<APInt, 1 << Bits> ExactValues;
// What constant range does ConstantRange method return?
ConstantRange ActualCR = RangeFn(CR);
// We'll want to sanity-check the ActualCR, so this will build our own CR.
OpRangeGathererTy ExactR(CR.getBitWidth());
// Let's iterate for each value in the original constant range.
ForeachNumInConstantRange(CR, [&](const APInt &N) {
// For this singular value, what is the true new value?
const APInt NewN = IntFn(N);
// Constant range provided by ConstantRange method must be conservatively
// correct, it must contain the true new value.
EXPECT_TRUE(ActualCR.contains(NewN));
// Record this true new value in our own constant range.
ExactR.account(NewN);
// And record the new true value itself.
ExactValues.insert(NewN);
});
// So, what range did we grok by exhaustively looking over each value?
ConstantRange ExactCR = ExactR.getRange();
// So, how many new values are there actually, and as per the ranges?
unsigned NumActualValues = ExactValues.size();
unsigned NumValuesInExactCR = GetNumValuesInConstantRange(ExactCR);
unsigned NumValuesInActualCR = GetNumValuesInConstantRange(ActualCR);
// Ranges should contain at least as much values as there actually was,
// but it is possible they will contain extras.
EXPECT_GE(NumValuesInExactCR, NumActualValues);
EXPECT_GE(NumValuesInActualCR, NumActualValues);
// We expect that OpRangeGathererTy produces the exactly identical range
// to what the ConstantRange method does.
EXPECT_EQ(ExactR.getRange(), ActualCR);
// For precision testing, accumulate the overall numbers.
Total.NumActualValues += NumActualValues;
Total.NumValuesInActualCR += NumValuesInActualCR;
Total.NumValuesInExactCR += NumValuesInExactCR;
});
}
template <typename Fn1, typename Fn2>
static void TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(Fn1 RangeFn, Fn2 IntFn,
bool SkipSignedIntMin = false) {
@ -2479,16 +2400,9 @@ TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, binaryXor) {
}
TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, binaryNot) {
AccumulatedPrecisionData Precision;
TestUnaryOpExhaustive<UnsignedOpRangeGatherer>(
TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(
[](const ConstantRange &CR) { return CR.binaryNot(); },
[](const APInt &N) { return ~N; }, Precision);
// FIXME: the implementation is not precise.
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumActualValues, 1936u);
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumValuesInActualCR, 2496u);
EXPECT_EQ(Precision.NumValuesInExactCR, 2496u);
[](const APInt &N) { return ~N; });
TestUnsignedUnaryOpExhaustive(
[](const ConstantRange &CR) {
return CR.binaryXor(