[tbaa] Rename type-based-aa -> tbaa

For consistency with legacy pass name.
Helps with 37 instances of "unknown pass name 'tbaa'" in check-llvm under NPM.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84967

llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("cfl-anders-aa", CFLAndersAA())
 FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("cfl-steens-aa", CFLSteensAA())
 FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("scev-aa", SCEVAA())
 FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("scoped-noalias-aa", ScopedNoAliasAA())
-FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("type-based-aa", TypeBasedAA())
+FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS("tbaa", TypeBasedAA())
 #undef FUNCTION_ALIAS_ANALYSIS
 #undef FUNCTION_ANALYSIS
 

llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/AA.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>"                            \
-; RUN: "-aa-pipeline=basic-aa,type-based-aa" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: "-aa-pipeline=basic-aa,tbaa" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 ; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -basic-aa -tbaa -da | FileCheck %s
 
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'Dependence Analysis' for function 'test_no_noalias'

llvm/test/Analysis/TypeBasedAliasAnalysis/placement-tbaa.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -tbaa -basic-aa -aa-eval -evaluate-aa-metadata -print-no-aliases -print-may-aliases -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt < %s -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes=aa-eval -evaluate-aa-metadata -print-no-aliases -print-may-aliases -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes=aa-eval -evaluate-aa-metadata -print-no-aliases -print-may-aliases -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Generated with "clang -cc1 -disable-llvm-optzns -O1 -emit-llvm"
 ; #include <new>

llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/promote-order.ll

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ; RUN: opt -tbaa -basic-aa -licm -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=false -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AST
 ; RUN: opt -tbaa -basic-aa -licm -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -S < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,MSSA
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s  --check-prefixes=CHECK,AST
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop-mssa(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,MSSA
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s  --check-prefixes=CHECK,AST
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop-mssa(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,MSSA
 
 ; LICM should keep the stores in their original order when it sinks/promotes them.
 ; rdar://12045203

llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/promote-tls.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -tbaa -basic-aa -licm -S < %s | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ; If we can prove a local is thread local, we can insert stores during
 ; promotion which wouldn't be legal otherwise.

llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar-promote-memmodel.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -basic-aa -licm -S | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Make sure we don't hoist a conditionally-executed store out of the loop;
 ; it would violate the concurrency memory model

llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar-promote.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -basic-aa -tbaa -licm -S | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='require<aa>,require<targetir>,require<scalar-evolution>,require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(licm)' -S %s | FileCheck %s
 target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-a0:0:8-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128"
 
 @X = global i32 7   ; <i32*> [#uses=4]

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnrollAndJam/pragma-explicit.ll

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-unroll-and-jam -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-runtime -unroll-partial-threshold=60 < %s -S | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='loop-unroll-and-jam' -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-runtime -unroll-partial-threshold=60 < %s -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='loop-unroll-and-jam' -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-runtime -unroll-partial-threshold=60 < %s -S | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnrollAndJam/unroll-and-jam.ll

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
 ; RUN: opt -basic-aa -tbaa -loop-unroll-and-jam -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-and-jam-count=4 -unroll-remainder < %s -S | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=type-based-aa,basic-aa -passes='loop-unroll-and-jam' -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-and-jam-count=4 -unroll-remainder < %s -S | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=tbaa,basic-aa -passes='loop-unroll-and-jam' -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-and-jam-count=4 -unroll-remainder < %s -S | FileCheck %s
 
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"