Respect src register allocation requirements when breaking anti-dependencies. Remove some dead code.

llvm-svn: 84691
This commit is contained in:
David Goodwin 2009-10-20 22:50:43 +00:00
parent 0c35dbdf03
commit 4388beb884
1 changed files with 20 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -209,8 +209,7 @@ namespace {
void PrescanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Count);
void ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Count);
bool BreakAntiDependencies(bool CriticalPathOnly);
unsigned FindSuitableFreeRegister(unsigned AntiDepReg,
unsigned LastNewReg);
unsigned FindSuitableFreeRegister(unsigned AntiDepReg);
void ReleaseSucc(SUnit *SU, SDep *SuccEdge);
void ReleaseSuccessors(SUnit *SU);
@ -595,7 +594,7 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::PrescanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Count)
}
}
DEBUG(errs() << "\tGroups:");
DEBUG(errs() << "\tDef Groups:");
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isDef()) continue;
@ -637,6 +636,8 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::PrescanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Count)
void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned Count) {
DEBUG(errs() << "\tUse Groups:");
// Scan the register uses for this instruction and update
// live-ranges, groups and RegRefs.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
@ -645,6 +646,8 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (Reg == 0) continue;
DEBUG(errs() << " " << TRI->getName(Reg) << "=g" << GetGroup(Reg));
// It wasn't previously live but now it is, this is a kill. Forget
// the previous live-range information and start a new live-range
// for the register.
@ -653,6 +656,7 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
DefIndices[Reg] = ~0u;
RegRefs.erase(Reg);
LeaveGroup(Reg);
DEBUG(errs() << "->g" << GetGroup(Reg) << "(last-use)");
}
// Repeat, for subregisters.
for (const unsigned *Subreg = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg);
@ -663,9 +667,18 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
DefIndices[SubregReg] = ~0u;
RegRefs.erase(SubregReg);
LeaveGroup(SubregReg);
DEBUG(errs() << "->g" << GetGroup(SubregReg) << "(last-use)");
}
}
// If MI's uses have special allocation requirement, don't allow
// any use registers to be changed. Also assume all registers
// used in a call must not be changed (ABI).
if (MI->getDesc().isCall() || MI->getDesc().hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq()) {
DEBUG(if (GetGroup(Reg) != 0) errs() << "->g0(alloc-req)");
UnionGroups(Reg, 0);
}
// Note register reference...
const TargetRegisterClass *RC = NULL;
if (i < MI->getDesc().getNumOperands())
@ -674,6 +687,8 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
RegRefs.insert(std::make_pair(Reg, RR));
}
DEBUG(errs() << '\n');
// Form a group of all defs and uses of a KILL instruction to ensure
// that all registers are renamed as a group.
if (MI->getOpcode() == TargetInstrInfo::KILL) {
@ -694,8 +709,7 @@ void SchedulePostRATDList::ScanInstruction(MachineInstr *MI,
}
}
unsigned SchedulePostRATDList::FindSuitableFreeRegister(unsigned AntiDepReg,
unsigned LastNewReg) {
unsigned SchedulePostRATDList::FindSuitableFreeRegister(unsigned AntiDepReg) {
// Collect all registers in the same group as AntiDepReg. These all
// need to be renamed together if we are to break the
// anti-dependence.
@ -846,12 +860,6 @@ bool SchedulePostRATDList::BreakAntiDependencies(bool CriticalPathOnly) {
std::string dbgStr;
#endif
// TODO: If we tracked more than one register here, we could potentially
// fix that remaining critical edge too. This is a little more involved,
// because unlike the most recent register, less recent registers should
// still be considered, though only if no other registers are available.
unsigned LastNewReg[TargetRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister] = {};
// Attempt to break anti-dependence edges. Walk the instructions
// from the bottom up, tracking information about liveness as we go
// to help determine which registers are available.
@ -969,12 +977,8 @@ bool SchedulePostRATDList::BreakAntiDependencies(bool CriticalPathOnly) {
DEBUG(if (!dbgStr.empty()) errs() << dbgStr << '\n');
// Look for a suitable register to use to break the anti-dependence.
//
// TODO: Instead of picking the first free register, consider which might
// be the best.
if (AntiDepReg != 0) {
if (unsigned NewReg = FindSuitableFreeRegister(AntiDepReg,
LastNewReg[AntiDepReg])) {
if (unsigned NewReg = FindSuitableFreeRegister(AntiDepReg)) {
DEBUG(errs() << "\tBreaking anti-dependence edge on "
<< TRI->getName(AntiDepReg)
<< " with " << RegRefs.count(AntiDepReg) << " references"
@ -1008,7 +1012,6 @@ bool SchedulePostRATDList::BreakAntiDependencies(bool CriticalPathOnly) {
"Kill and Def maps aren't consistent for AntiDepReg!");
Changed = true;
LastNewReg[AntiDepReg] = NewReg;
++NumFixedAnti;
}
}