First pass at collecting access-specifier information along inheritance paths.

Triggers lots of assertions about missing access information;  fix them.

Will actually consume this information soon.

llvm-svn: 94038
This commit is contained in:
John McCall 2010-01-20 21:53:11 +00:00
parent dd969c897e
commit 401982f56c
7 changed files with 68 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ struct CXXBasePathElement {
/// subobject is being used.
class CXXBasePath : public llvm::SmallVector<CXXBasePathElement, 4> {
public:
/// \brief The access along this inheritance path.
AccessSpecifier Access;
/// \brief The set of declarations found inside this base class
/// subobject.
DeclContext::lookup_result Decls;
@ -131,9 +134,13 @@ class CXXBasePaths {
/// is also recorded.
bool DetectVirtual;
/// ScratchPath - A BasePath that is used by Sema::IsDerivedFrom
/// ScratchPath - A BasePath that is used by Sema::lookupInBases
/// to help build the set of paths.
CXXBasePath ScratchPath;
/// ScratchAccess - A stack of accessibility annotations used by
/// Sema::lookupInBases.
llvm::SmallVector<AccessSpecifier, 4> ScratchAccess;
/// DetectedVirtual - The base class that is virtual.
const RecordType *DetectedVirtual;

View File

@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void CXXBasePaths::clear() {
Paths.clear();
ClassSubobjects.clear();
ScratchPath.clear();
ScratchAccess.clear();
DetectedVirtual = 0;
}
@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ bool CXXRecordDecl::lookupInBases(BaseMatchesCallback *BaseMatches,
void *UserData,
CXXBasePaths &Paths) const {
bool FoundPath = false;
ASTContext &Context = getASTContext();
for (base_class_const_iterator BaseSpec = bases_begin(),
BaseSpecEnd = bases_end(); BaseSpec != BaseSpecEnd; ++BaseSpec) {
@ -189,6 +190,17 @@ bool CXXRecordDecl::lookupInBases(BaseMatchesCallback *BaseMatches,
else
Element.SubobjectNumber = Subobjects.second;
Paths.ScratchPath.push_back(Element);
// C++0x [class.access.base]p1 (paraphrased):
// The access of a member of a base class is the less permissive
// of its access within the base class and the access of the base
// class within the derived class.
// We're just calculating the access along the path, so we ignore
// the access specifiers of whatever decls we've found.
AccessSpecifier PathAccess = Paths.ScratchPath.Access;
Paths.ScratchAccess.push_back(PathAccess);
Paths.ScratchPath.Access
= std::max(PathAccess, BaseSpec->getAccessSpecifier());
}
if (BaseMatches(BaseSpec, Paths.ScratchPath, UserData)) {
@ -223,8 +235,12 @@ bool CXXRecordDecl::lookupInBases(BaseMatchesCallback *BaseMatches,
// Pop this base specifier off the current path (if we're
// collecting paths).
if (Paths.isRecordingPaths())
if (Paths.isRecordingPaths()) {
Paths.ScratchPath.pop_back();
Paths.ScratchPath.Access = Paths.ScratchAccess.back();
Paths.ScratchAccess.pop_back();
}
// If we set a virtual earlier, and this isn't a path, forget it again.
if (SetVirtual && !FoundPath) {
Paths.DetectedVirtual = 0;

View File

@ -410,9 +410,16 @@ SourceLocation Decl::getBodyRBrace() const {
#ifndef NDEBUG
void Decl::CheckAccessDeclContext() const {
// If the decl is the toplevel translation unit or if we're not in a
// record decl context, we don't need to check anything.
// Suppress this check if any of the following hold:
// 1. this is the translation unit (and thus has no parent)
// 2. this is a template parameter (and thus doesn't belong to its context)
// 3. this is a ParmVarDecl (which can be in a record context during
// the brief period between its creation and the creation of the
// FunctionDecl)
// 4. the context is not a record
if (isa<TranslationUnitDecl>(this) ||
isTemplateParameter() ||
isa<ParmVarDecl>(this) ||
!isa<CXXRecordDecl>(getDeclContext()))
return;

View File

@ -245,10 +245,16 @@ public:
return IDNS;
}
/// \brief Add a declaration to these results with no access bits.
/// \brief Add a declaration to these results with its natural access.
/// Does not test the acceptance criteria.
void addDecl(NamedDecl *D) {
Decls.addDecl(D);
addDecl(D, D->getAccess());
}
/// \brief Add a declaration to these results with the given access.
/// Does not test the acceptance criteria.
void addDecl(NamedDecl *D, AccessSpecifier AS) {
Decls.addDecl(D, AS);
ResultKind = Found;
}

View File

@ -1305,6 +1305,9 @@ void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) {
// Keep a chain of previous declarations.
New->setPreviousDeclaration(Old);
// Inherit access appropriately.
New->setAccess(Old->getAccess());
}
static void MarkLive(CFGBlock *e, llvm::BitVector &live) {
@ -3361,6 +3364,10 @@ Sema::ActOnFunctionDeclarator(Scope* S, Declarator& D, DeclContext* DC,
}
if (D.getCXXScopeSpec().isSet() && !NewFD->isInvalidDecl()) {
// Fake up an access specifier if it's supposed to be a class member.
if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(NewFD->getDeclContext()))
NewFD->setAccess(AS_public);
// An out-of-line member function declaration must also be a
// definition (C++ [dcl.meaning]p1).
// Note that this is not the case for explicit specializations of

View File

@ -445,8 +445,9 @@ static bool LookupDirect(LookupResult &R, const DeclContext *DC) {
DeclContext::lookup_const_iterator I, E;
for (llvm::tie(I, E) = DC->lookup(R.getLookupName()); I != E; ++I) {
if (R.isAcceptableDecl(*I)) {
R.addDecl(*I);
NamedDecl *D = *I;
if (R.isAcceptableDecl(D)) {
R.addDecl(D);
Found = true;
}
}
@ -1047,10 +1048,15 @@ bool Sema::LookupQualifiedName(LookupResult &R, DeclContext *LookupCtx,
// FIXME: support using declarations!
QualType SubobjectType;
int SubobjectNumber = 0;
AccessSpecifier SubobjectAccess = AS_private;
for (CXXBasePaths::paths_iterator Path = Paths.begin(), PathEnd = Paths.end();
Path != PathEnd; ++Path) {
const CXXBasePathElement &PathElement = Path->back();
// Pick the best (i.e. most permissive i.e. numerically lowest) access
// across all paths.
SubobjectAccess = std::min(SubobjectAccess, Path->Access);
// Determine whether we're looking at a distinct sub-object or not.
if (SubobjectType.isNull()) {
// This is the first subobject we've looked at. Record its type.
@ -1106,7 +1112,7 @@ bool Sema::LookupQualifiedName(LookupResult &R, DeclContext *LookupCtx,
DeclContext::lookup_iterator I, E;
for (llvm::tie(I,E) = Paths.front().Decls; I != E; ++I)
R.addDecl(*I);
R.addDecl(*I, std::max(SubobjectAccess, (*I)->getAccess()));
R.resolveKind();
return true;
}

View File

@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitTypedefDecl(TypedefDecl *D) {
Typedef->setPreviousDeclaration(cast<TypedefDecl>(InstPrev));
}
Typedef->setAccess(D->getAccess());
Owner->addDecl(Typedef);
return Typedef;
@ -208,6 +209,8 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitVarDecl(VarDecl *D) {
if (D->isOutOfLine())
Var->setLexicalDeclContext(D->getLexicalDeclContext());
Var->setAccess(D->getAccess());
// FIXME: In theory, we could have a previous declaration for variables that
// are not static data members.
bool Redeclaration = false;
@ -375,6 +378,7 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFieldDecl(FieldDecl *D) {
}
Field->setImplicit(D->isImplicit());
Field->setAccess(D->getAccess());
Owner->addDecl(Field);
return Field;
@ -559,6 +563,7 @@ Decl *TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitClassTemplateDecl(ClassTemplateDecl *D) {
return Inst;
}
Inst->setAccess(D->getAccess());
Owner->addDecl(Inst);
// First, we sort the partial specializations by location, so
@ -634,6 +639,8 @@ TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
if (!Instantiated)
return 0;
Instantiated->setAccess(D->getAccess());
// Link the instantiated function template declaration to the function
// template from which it was instantiated.
FunctionTemplateDecl *InstTemplate
@ -964,6 +971,8 @@ TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitCXXMethodDecl(CXXMethodDecl *D,
if (D->isPure())
SemaRef.CheckPureMethod(Method, SourceRange());
Method->setAccess(D->getAccess());
if (!FunctionTemplate && (!Method->isInvalidDecl() || Previous.empty()) &&
!Method->getFriendObjectKind())
Owner->addDecl(Method);