forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Bug 7377: printf checking fails to flag some undefined behavior
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7377 Updated format string highlighting and fixits to take advantage of the new CharSourceRange class. - Change HighlightRange to allow highlighting whitespace only in a CharSourceRange (for warnings about the ' ' (space) flag) - Change format specifier range helper function to allow for half-open ranges (+1 to end) - Enabled previously failing tests (FIXMEs/XFAILs removed) - Small fixes and additions to format string test cases M test/Sema/format-strings.c M test/Sema/format-strings-fixit.c M lib/Frontend/TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp M lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp llvm-svn: 106480
This commit is contained in:
parent
24757ff75e
commit
3f272b853f
|
@ -123,21 +123,24 @@ void TextDiagnosticPrinter::HighlightRange(const CharSourceRange &R,
|
|||
|
||||
assert(StartColNo <= EndColNo && "Invalid range!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick the first non-whitespace column.
|
||||
while (StartColNo < SourceLine.size() &&
|
||||
(SourceLine[StartColNo] == ' ' || SourceLine[StartColNo] == '\t'))
|
||||
++StartColNo;
|
||||
// Check that a token range does not highlight only whitespace.
|
||||
if (R.isTokenRange()) {
|
||||
// Pick the first non-whitespace column.
|
||||
while (StartColNo < SourceLine.size() &&
|
||||
(SourceLine[StartColNo] == ' ' || SourceLine[StartColNo] == '\t'))
|
||||
++StartColNo;
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick the last non-whitespace column.
|
||||
if (EndColNo > SourceLine.size())
|
||||
EndColNo = SourceLine.size();
|
||||
while (EndColNo-1 &&
|
||||
(SourceLine[EndColNo-1] == ' ' || SourceLine[EndColNo-1] == '\t'))
|
||||
--EndColNo;
|
||||
// Pick the last non-whitespace column.
|
||||
if (EndColNo > SourceLine.size())
|
||||
EndColNo = SourceLine.size();
|
||||
while (EndColNo-1 &&
|
||||
(SourceLine[EndColNo-1] == ' ' || SourceLine[EndColNo-1] == '\t'))
|
||||
--EndColNo;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the start/end passed each other, then we are trying to highlight a range
|
||||
// that just exists in whitespace, which must be some sort of other bug.
|
||||
assert(StartColNo <= EndColNo && "Trying to highlight whitespace??");
|
||||
// If the start/end passed each other, then we are trying to highlight a range
|
||||
// that just exists in whitespace, which must be some sort of other bug.
|
||||
assert(StartColNo <= EndColNo && "Trying to highlight whitespace??");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fill the range with ~'s.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = StartColNo; i < EndColNo; ++i)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1194,8 +1194,8 @@ public:
|
|||
unsigned specifierLen);
|
||||
private:
|
||||
SourceRange getFormatStringRange();
|
||||
SourceRange getFormatSpecifierRange(const char *startSpecifier,
|
||||
unsigned specifierLen);
|
||||
CharSourceRange getFormatSpecifierRange(const char *startSpecifier,
|
||||
unsigned specifierLen);
|
||||
SourceLocation getLocationOfByte(const char *x);
|
||||
|
||||
bool HandleAmount(const analyze_printf::OptionalAmount &Amt, unsigned k,
|
||||
|
@ -1220,10 +1220,15 @@ SourceRange CheckPrintfHandler::getFormatStringRange() {
|
|||
return OrigFormatExpr->getSourceRange();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SourceRange CheckPrintfHandler::
|
||||
CharSourceRange CheckPrintfHandler::
|
||||
getFormatSpecifierRange(const char *startSpecifier, unsigned specifierLen) {
|
||||
return SourceRange(getLocationOfByte(startSpecifier),
|
||||
getLocationOfByte(startSpecifier+specifierLen-1));
|
||||
SourceLocation Start = getLocationOfByte(startSpecifier);
|
||||
SourceLocation End = getLocationOfByte(startSpecifier + specifierLen - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Advance the end SourceLocation by one due to half-open ranges.
|
||||
End = End.getFileLocWithOffset(1);
|
||||
|
||||
return CharSourceRange::getCharRange(Start, End);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SourceLocation CheckPrintfHandler::getLocationOfByte(const char *x) {
|
||||
|
@ -1451,7 +1456,7 @@ CheckPrintfHandler::HandleFormatSpecifier(const analyze_printf::FormatSpecifier
|
|||
|
||||
// Check for invalid use of field width
|
||||
if (!FS.hasValidFieldWidth()) {
|
||||
HandleInvalidAmount(FS, FS.getFieldWidth(), /* field width */ 1,
|
||||
HandleInvalidAmount(FS, FS.getFieldWidth(), /* field width */ 0,
|
||||
startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1466,21 +1471,17 @@ CheckPrintfHandler::HandleFormatSpecifier(const analyze_printf::FormatSpecifier
|
|||
HandleFlag(FS, FS.hasLeadingZeros(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (!FS.hasValidPlusPrefix())
|
||||
HandleFlag(FS, FS.hasPlusPrefix(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
// FIXME: the following lines are disabled due to clang assertions on
|
||||
// highlights containing spaces.
|
||||
// if (!FS.hasValidSpacePrefix())
|
||||
// HandleFlag(FS, FS.hasSpacePrefix(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (!FS.hasValidSpacePrefix())
|
||||
HandleFlag(FS, FS.hasSpacePrefix(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (!FS.hasValidAlternativeForm())
|
||||
HandleFlag(FS, FS.hasAlternativeForm(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (!FS.hasValidLeftJustified())
|
||||
HandleFlag(FS, FS.isLeftJustified(), startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that flags are not ignored by another flag
|
||||
// FIXME: the following lines are disabled due to clang assertions on
|
||||
// highlights containing spaces.
|
||||
//if (FS.hasSpacePrefix() && FS.hasPlusPrefix()) // ' ' ignored by '+'
|
||||
// HandleIgnoredFlag(FS, FS.hasSpacePrefix(), FS.hasPlusPrefix(),
|
||||
// startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (FS.hasSpacePrefix() && FS.hasPlusPrefix()) // ' ' ignored by '+'
|
||||
HandleIgnoredFlag(FS, FS.hasSpacePrefix(), FS.hasPlusPrefix(),
|
||||
startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
if (FS.hasLeadingZeros() && FS.isLeftJustified()) // '0' ignored by '-'
|
||||
HandleIgnoredFlag(FS, FS.hasLeadingZeros(), FS.isLeftJustified(),
|
||||
startSpecifier, specifierLen);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
|
|||
// RUN: cp %s %t
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -pedantic -Wall -fixit %t || true
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -pedantic -Wall -Werror %t
|
||||
// XFAIL: *
|
||||
// FIXME: Some of these tests currently fail due to a bug in the HighlightRange
|
||||
// function in lib/Frontend/TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp.
|
||||
|
||||
/* This is a test of the various code modification hints that are
|
||||
provided as part of warning or extension diagnostics. All of the
|
||||
|
@ -26,9 +23,10 @@ void test() {
|
|||
printf("%1d", (long double) 1.23);
|
||||
|
||||
// Flag handling
|
||||
printf("%0+s", (unsigned) 31337); // flags should stay
|
||||
printf("%0f", "test"); // flag should be removed
|
||||
printf("%0+s", (unsigned) 31337); // 0 flag should stay
|
||||
printf("%#p", (void *) 0);
|
||||
printf("% +f", 1.23); // + flag should stay
|
||||
printf("%0-f", 1.23); // - flag should stay
|
||||
|
||||
// Positional arguments
|
||||
printf("%1$f:%2$.*3$f:%4$.*3$f\n", 1, 2, 3, 4);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,4 @@
|
|||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wformat-nonliteral %s
|
||||
// XFAIL: *
|
||||
// FIXME: temporarily marking as expected fail until whitespace highlighting
|
||||
// is fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
#include <stdarg.h>
|
||||
typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
|
||||
|
@ -277,7 +274,8 @@ void bug7377_bad_length_mod_usage() {
|
|||
|
||||
// Bad optional amount use
|
||||
printf("%.2c", 'a'); // expected-warning{{precision used with 'c' conversion specifier, resulting in undefined behavior}}
|
||||
printf("%1n", (void *) 0); // expected-warning{{precision used with 'n' conversion specifier, resulting in undefined behavior}} expected-warning{{use of '%n' in format string discouraged (potentially insecure)}}
|
||||
printf("%1n", (void *) 0); // expected-warning{{field width used with 'n' conversion specifier, resulting in undefined behavior}} expected-warning{{use of '%n' in format string discouraged (potentially insecure)}}
|
||||
printf("%.9n", (void *) 0); // expected-warning{{precision used with 'n' conversion specifier, resulting in undefined behavior}} expected-warning{{use of '%n' in format string discouraged (potentially insecure)}}
|
||||
|
||||
// Ignored flags
|
||||
printf("% +f", 1.23); // expected-warning{{flag ' ' is ignored when flag '+' is present}}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue