Get rid of the bit twiddling to read / set OpActions and ValueTypeActions. The small saving in memory isn't worth the increase in runtime and code complexity in my opinion.

llvm-svn: 103768
This commit is contained in:
Evan Cheng 2010-05-14 07:37:40 +00:00
parent 05cfc295f4
commit 3e51388e6a
1 changed files with 10 additions and 26 deletions

View File

@ -180,11 +180,9 @@ public:
}
class ValueTypeActionImpl {
/// ValueTypeActions - This is a bitvector that contains two bits for each
/// value type, where the two bits correspond to the LegalizeAction enum.
/// This can be queried with "getTypeAction(VT)".
/// dimension by (MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE/32) * 2
uint32_t ValueTypeActions[(MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE/32)*2];
/// ValueTypeActions - For each value type, keep a LegalizeAction enum
/// that indicates how instruction selection should deal with the type.
uint8_t ValueTypeActions[MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE];
public:
ValueTypeActionImpl() {
std::fill(ValueTypeActions, array_endof(ValueTypeActions), 0);
@ -201,15 +199,11 @@ public:
return Legal;
}
unsigned I = VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy;
assert(I<4*array_lengthof(ValueTypeActions)*sizeof(ValueTypeActions[0]));
unsigned Mask = (unsigned)MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE-1;
return (LegalizeAction)((ValueTypeActions[I>>4] >> ((2*I) & Mask)) & 3);
return (LegalizeAction)ValueTypeActions[I];
}
void setTypeAction(EVT VT, LegalizeAction Action) {
unsigned I = VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy;
assert(I<4*array_lengthof(ValueTypeActions)*sizeof(ValueTypeActions[0]));
unsigned Mask = (unsigned)MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE-1;
ValueTypeActions[I>>4] |= Action << ((I*2) & Mask);
ValueTypeActions[I] = Action;
}
};
@ -358,13 +352,9 @@ public:
/// for it.
LegalizeAction getOperationAction(unsigned Op, EVT VT) const {
if (VT.isExtended()) return Expand;
assert(Op < array_lengthof(OpActions[0]) &&
(unsigned)VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy < sizeof(OpActions[0][0])*8 &&
"Table isn't big enough!");
assert(Op < array_lengthof(OpActions[0]) && "Table isn't big enough!");
unsigned I = (unsigned) VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy;
unsigned J = I & ((unsigned)MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE-1);
I = I >> 5;
return (LegalizeAction)((OpActions[I][Op] >> (J*2)) & 3);
return (LegalizeAction)OpActions[I][Op];
}
/// isOperationLegalOrCustom - Return true if the specified operation is
@ -988,11 +978,8 @@ protected:
/// with the specified type and indicate what to do about it.
void setOperationAction(unsigned Op, MVT VT,
LegalizeAction Action) {
unsigned I = (unsigned)VT.SimpleTy;
unsigned J = I & ((unsigned)MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE - 1);
I = I >> 5;
OpActions[I][Op] &= ~(uint64_t(3UL) << (J*2));
OpActions[I][Op] |= (uint64_t)Action << (J*2);
assert(Op < array_lengthof(OpActions[0]) && "Table isn't big enough!");
OpActions[(unsigned)VT.SimpleTy][Op] = (uint8_t)Action;
}
/// setLoadExtAction - Indicate that the specified load with extension does
@ -1593,10 +1580,7 @@ private:
/// Most operations are Legal (aka, supported natively by the target), but
/// operations that are not should be described. Note that operations on
/// non-legal value types are not described here.
/// This array is accessed using VT.getSimpleVT(), so it is subject to
/// the MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE * 2 bits.
uint64_t OpActions[MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE/(sizeof(uint64_t)*4)]
[ISD::BUILTIN_OP_END];
uint8_t OpActions[MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE][ISD::BUILTIN_OP_END];
/// LoadExtActions - For each load extension type and each value type,
/// keep a LegalizeAction that indicates how instruction selection should deal