forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Make sure the types are consistent for a void conditional. No visible
difference, but it's better to be consistent. llvm-svn: 51961
This commit is contained in:
parent
2425cd8158
commit
3e1852fa7e
|
@ -917,15 +917,15 @@ inline QualType Sema::CheckConditionalOperands( // C99 6.5.15
|
|||
// C99 6.5.15p5: "If both operands have void type, the result has void type."
|
||||
// The following || allows only one side to be void (a GCC-ism).
|
||||
if (lexT->isVoidType() || rexT->isVoidType()) {
|
||||
if (!lexT->isVoidType()) {
|
||||
if (!lexT->isVoidType())
|
||||
Diag(rex->getLocStart(), diag::ext_typecheck_cond_one_void,
|
||||
rex->getSourceRange());
|
||||
return rexT.getUnqualifiedType();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!rexT->isVoidType())
|
||||
Diag(lex->getLocStart(), diag::ext_typecheck_cond_one_void,
|
||||
lex->getSourceRange());
|
||||
return lexT.getUnqualifiedType();
|
||||
ImpCastExprToType(lex, Context.VoidTy);
|
||||
ImpCastExprToType(rex, Context.VoidTy);
|
||||
return Context.VoidTy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// C99 6.5.15p6 - "if one operand is a null pointer constant, the result has
|
||||
// the type of the other operand."
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue