forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[ms-inline asm] Add a helper function, isMSAsmKeyword().
These require special handling, which we don't currently handle. This is being put in place to ensure we don't do invalid symbol table lookups or try to parse invalid assembly. The test cases just makes sure the latter isn't happening. llvm-svn: 162050
This commit is contained in:
parent
2c4ca0fa7d
commit
3d4b98b4bc
|
@ -2762,6 +2762,17 @@ StmtResult Sema::ActOnAsmStmt(SourceLocation AsmLoc, bool IsSimple,
|
|||
return Owned(NS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// isMSAsmKeyword - Return true if this is an MS-style inline asm keyword. These
|
||||
// require special handling.
|
||||
static bool isMSAsmKeyword(StringRef Name) {
|
||||
bool Ret = llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(Name)
|
||||
.Cases("EVEN", "ALIGN", true) // Alignment directives.
|
||||
.Cases("LENGTH", "SIZE", "TYPE", true) // Type and variable sizes.
|
||||
.Case("_emit", true) // _emit Pseudoinstruction.
|
||||
.Default(false);
|
||||
return Ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void patchMSAsmStrings(Sema &SemaRef, bool &IsSimple,
|
||||
SourceLocation AsmLoc,
|
||||
ArrayRef<Token> AsmToks,
|
||||
|
@ -2795,7 +2806,14 @@ static void patchMSAsmStrings(Sema &SemaRef, bool &IsSimple,
|
|||
if (isNewAsm) {
|
||||
AsmRegs[NumAsmStrings].resize(AsmToks.size());
|
||||
AsmNames[NumAsmStrings].resize(AsmToks.size());
|
||||
Asm = AsmToks[i].getIdentifierInfo()->getName().str();
|
||||
|
||||
StringRef Piece = AsmToks[i].getIdentifierInfo()->getName();
|
||||
// MS-style inline asm keywords require special handling.
|
||||
if (isMSAsmKeyword(Piece))
|
||||
IsSimple = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Verify this is a valid opcode.
|
||||
Asm = Piece;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2834,6 +2852,13 @@ static void patchMSAsmStrings(Sema &SemaRef, bool &IsSimple,
|
|||
|
||||
IsSimple = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// MS-style inline asm keywords require special handling.
|
||||
if (isMSAsmKeyword(Name)) {
|
||||
IsSimple = false;
|
||||
Asm += Name;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Why are we missing this segment register?
|
||||
if (Name == "fs") {
|
||||
Asm += Name;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -98,3 +98,23 @@ unsigned t11(void) {
|
|||
// CHECK: [[RET:%[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = load i32* [[J]], align 4
|
||||
// CHECK: ret i32 [[RET]]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void t12(void) {
|
||||
__asm EVEN
|
||||
__asm ALIGN
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void t13(void) {
|
||||
__asm {
|
||||
_emit 0x4A
|
||||
_emit 0x43
|
||||
_emit 0x4B
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void t14(void) {
|
||||
unsigned arr[10];
|
||||
__asm LENGTH arr ; sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0])
|
||||
__asm SIZE arr ; sizeof(arr)
|
||||
__asm TYPE arr ; sizeof(arr[0])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue