forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[X86] avoid assert with varargs, soft float, and no-implicit-float
Fixes: - PR36507 Floating point varargs are not handled correctly with -mno-implicit-float - PR48528 __builtin_va_start assumes it can pass SSE registers when using -Xclang -msoft-float -Xclang -no-implicit-float On x86_64, floating-point parameters are normally passed in XMM registers. For va_start, we spill those to memory so va_arg can find them. There is an interaction here with -msoft-float and -no-implicit-float: When -msoft-float is in effect, instead of passing floating-point parameters in XMM registers, they are passed in general-purpose registers. When -no-implicit-float is in effect, it "disables implicit floating-point instructions" (per the LangRef). The intended effect is to not have the compiler generate floating-point code unless explicit floating-point operations are present in the source code, but what exactly counts as an explicit floating-point operation is not specified. The existing behavior of LLVM here has led to some surprises and PRs. This change modifies the behavior as follows: | soft | no-implicit | old behavior | new behavior | | no | no | spill XMM regs | spill XMM regs | | yes | no | don't spill XMM | don't spill XMM | | no | yes | don't spill XMM | spill XMM regs | | yes | yes | assert | don't spill XMM | In particular, this avoids the assert that happens when -msoft-float and -no-implicit-float are both in effect. This seems like a perfectly reasonable combination: If we don't want to rely on hardware floating-point support, we want to both avoid using float registers to pass parameters and avoid having the compiler generate floating-point code that wasn't in the original program. Instead of crashing the compiler, the new behavior is to not synthesize floating-point code in this case. This fixes PR48528. The other interesting case is when -no-implicit-float is in effect, but -msoft-float is not. In that case, any floating-point parameters that are present will be in XMM registers, and so we have to spill them to correctly handle those. This fixes PR36507. The spill is conditional on %al indicating that parameters are present in XMM registers, so no floating-point code will be executed unless the function is called with floating-point parameters. Reviewed By: rnk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104001
This commit is contained in:
parent
a11880468e
commit
3bc899b4de
|
@ -3377,12 +3377,8 @@ static ArrayRef<MCPhysReg> get64BitArgumentXMMs(MachineFunction &MF,
|
|||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const Function &F = MF.getFunction();
|
||||
bool NoImplicitFloatOps = F.hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoImplicitFloat);
|
||||
bool isSoftFloat = Subtarget.useSoftFloat();
|
||||
assert(!(isSoftFloat && NoImplicitFloatOps) &&
|
||||
"SSE register cannot be used when SSE is disabled!");
|
||||
if (isSoftFloat || NoImplicitFloatOps || !Subtarget.hasSSE1())
|
||||
if (isSoftFloat || !Subtarget.hasSSE1())
|
||||
// Kernel mode asks for SSE to be disabled, so there are no XMM argument
|
||||
// registers.
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
|
@ -3454,11 +3450,6 @@ void VarArgsLoweringHelper::createVarArgAreaAndStoreRegisters(
|
|||
FrameInfo.CreateFixedObject(1, StackSize, true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Figure out if XMM registers are in use.
|
||||
assert(!(Subtarget.useSoftFloat() &&
|
||||
TheFunction.hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoImplicitFloat)) &&
|
||||
"SSE register cannot be used when SSE is disabled!");
|
||||
|
||||
// 64-bit calling conventions support varargs and register parameters, so we
|
||||
// have to do extra work to spill them in the prologue.
|
||||
if (is64Bit()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
|||
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
%struct.__va_list_tag = type { i32, i32, i8*, i8* }
|
||||
|
||||
declare void @llvm.va_end(i8*) #0
|
||||
declare void @llvm.va_start(i8*) #10
|
||||
|
||||
define void @hardf(i8* %fmt, ...) #1 {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: hardf
|
||||
; When using XMM registers to pass floating-point parameters,
|
||||
; we need to spill those for va_start.
|
||||
; CHECK: testb %al, %al
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm0, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm1, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm2, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm3, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm4, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm5, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm6, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm7, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
%va = alloca [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], align 16
|
||||
%arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag]* %va, i64 0, i64 0
|
||||
%a = bitcast %struct.__va_list_tag* %arraydecay to i8*
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %a)
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_end(i8* nonnull %a)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define void @softf(i8* %fmt, ...) #2 {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: softf
|
||||
; For software floating point, floats are passed in general
|
||||
; purpose registers, so no need to spill XMM registers.
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: %xmm
|
||||
; CHECK: retq
|
||||
%va = alloca [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], align 16
|
||||
%arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag]* %va, i64 0, i64 0
|
||||
%a = bitcast %struct.__va_list_tag* %arraydecay to i8*
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %a)
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_end(i8* nonnull %a)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define void @noimplf(i8* %fmt, ...) #3 {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: noimplf
|
||||
; Even with noimplicitfloat, when using the hardware float API, we
|
||||
; need to emit code to spill the XMM registers (PR36507).
|
||||
; CHECK: testb %al, %al
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm0, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm1, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm2, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm3, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm4, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm5, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm6, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
; CHECK: movaps %xmm7, {{.*}}%rsp
|
||||
%va = alloca [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], align 16
|
||||
%arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag]* %va, i64 0, i64 0
|
||||
%a = bitcast %struct.__va_list_tag* %arraydecay to i8*
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %a)
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_end(i8* nonnull %a)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define void @noimplsoftf(i8* %fmt, ...) #4 {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: noimplsoftf
|
||||
; Combining noimplicitfloat and use-soft-float should not assert (PR48528).
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: %xmm
|
||||
; CHECK: retq
|
||||
%va = alloca [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], align 16
|
||||
%arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag], [1 x %struct.__va_list_tag]* %va, i64 0, i64 0
|
||||
%a = bitcast %struct.__va_list_tag* %arraydecay to i8*
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %a)
|
||||
call void @llvm.va_end(i8* nonnull %a)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
attributes #0 = { nounwind }
|
||||
attributes #1 = { nounwind uwtable }
|
||||
attributes #2 = { nounwind uwtable "use-soft-float"="true" }
|
||||
attributes #3 = { noimplicitfloat nounwind uwtable }
|
||||
attributes #4 = { noimplicitfloat nounwind uwtable "use-soft-float"="true" }
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue