PR14992: Debug Info: Support more non-type template parameters

* Provide DW_TAG_template_value_parameter for pointers, function
  pointers, member pointers, and member function pointers (still missing
  support for template template parameters which GCC encodes as a
  DW_TAG_GNU_template_template_param)
* Provide values for all but the (member & non-member) function pointer case.
  Simple constant integer values for member pointers (offset within the
  object) and address for the value pointer case. GCC doesn't provide a
  value for the member function pointer case so I'm not sure how, if at
  all, GDB supports encoding that. & non-member function pointers should
  follow shortly in a subsequent patch.
* Null pointer value encodings of all of these types, including
  correctly encoding null data member pointers as -1.

llvm-svn: 181634
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2013-05-10 21:53:14 +00:00
parent a1e813dcd4
commit 38079fd26f
2 changed files with 129 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "CGDebugInfo.h"
#include "CGBlocks.h"
#include "CGCXXABI.h"
#include "CGObjCRuntime.h"
#include "CodeGenFunction.h"
#include "CodeGenModule.h"
@ -1188,17 +1189,88 @@ CollectTemplateParams(const TemplateParameterList *TPList,
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TAList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
const TemplateArgument &TA = TAList[i];
const NamedDecl *ND = TPList->getParam(i);
if (TA.getKind() == TemplateArgument::Type) {
switch (TA.getKind()) {
case TemplateArgument::Type: {
llvm::DIType TTy = getOrCreateType(TA.getAsType(), Unit);
llvm::DITemplateTypeParameter TTP =
DBuilder.createTemplateTypeParameter(TheCU, ND->getName(), TTy);
TemplateParams.push_back(TTP);
} else if (TA.getKind() == TemplateArgument::Integral) {
} break;
case TemplateArgument::Integral: {
llvm::DIType TTy = getOrCreateType(TA.getIntegralType(), Unit);
llvm::DITemplateValueParameter TVP =
DBuilder.createTemplateValueParameter(TheCU, ND->getName(), TTy,
TA.getAsIntegral().getZExtValue());
TemplateParams.push_back(TVP);
DBuilder.createTemplateValueParameter(
TheCU, ND->getName(), TTy,
llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.getLLVMContext(), TA.getAsIntegral()));
TemplateParams.push_back(TVP);
} break;
case TemplateArgument::Declaration: {
const ValueDecl *D = TA.getAsDecl();
bool InstanceMember = D->isCXXInstanceMember();
QualType T = InstanceMember
? CGM.getContext().getMemberPointerType(
D->getType(), cast<RecordDecl>(D->getDeclContext())
->getTypeForDecl())
: CGM.getContext().getPointerType(D->getType());
llvm::DIType TTy = getOrCreateType(T, Unit);
llvm::Value *V = 0;
// Variable pointer template parameters have a value that is the address
// of the variable.
if (const VarDecl *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D))
V = CGM.GetAddrOfGlobalVar(VD);
// Member function pointers have special support for building them, though
// this is currently unsupported in LLVM CodeGen.
if (InstanceMember)
if (const CXXMethodDecl *method = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(D))
V = CGM.getCXXABI().EmitMemberPointer(method);
// Member data pointers have special handling too to compute the fixed
// offset within the object.
if (isa<FieldDecl>(D)) {
// These five lines (& possibly the above member function pointer
// handling) might be able to be refactored to use similar code in
// CodeGenModule::getMemberPointerConstant
uint64_t fieldOffset = CGM.getContext().getFieldOffset(D);
CharUnits chars =
CGM.getContext().toCharUnitsFromBits((int64_t) fieldOffset);
V = CGM.getCXXABI().EmitMemberDataPointer(
cast<MemberPointerType>(T.getTypePtr()), chars);
}
llvm::DITemplateValueParameter TVP =
DBuilder.createTemplateValueParameter(TheCU, ND->getName(), TTy, V);
TemplateParams.push_back(TVP);
} break;
case TemplateArgument::NullPtr: {
QualType T = TA.getNullPtrType();
llvm::DIType TTy = getOrCreateType(T, Unit);
llvm::Value *V = 0;
// Special case member data pointer null values since they're actually -1
// instead of zero.
if (const MemberPointerType *MPT =
dyn_cast<MemberPointerType>(T.getTypePtr()))
// But treat member function pointers as simple zero integers because
// it's easier than having a special case in LLVM's CodeGen. If LLVM
// CodeGen grows handling for values of non-null member function
// pointers then perhaps we could remove this special case and rely on
// EmitNullMemberPointer for member function pointers.
if (MPT->isMemberDataPointer())
V = CGM.getCXXABI().EmitNullMemberPointer(MPT);
if (!V)
V = llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int8Ty, 0);
llvm::DITemplateValueParameter TVP =
DBuilder.createTemplateValueParameter(TheCU, ND->getName(), TTy, V);
TemplateParams.push_back(TVP);
} break;
case TemplateArgument::Template:
// We could support this with the GCC extension
// DW_TAG_GNU_template_template_param
break;
// these next 4 should never occur
case TemplateArgument::Expression:
case TemplateArgument::TemplateExpansion:
case TemplateArgument::Pack:
case TemplateArgument::Null:
llvm_unreachable(
"These argument types shouldn't exist in concrete types");
}
}
return DBuilder.getOrCreateArray(TemplateParams);

View File

@ -1,26 +1,69 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -g %s -o - -std=c++11 | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang -S -emit-llvm -target x86_64-unknown_unknown -g %s -o - -std=c++11 | FileCheck %s
// CHECK: [[INT:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [int]
// CHECK: metadata [[TCI:![0-9]*]], i32 0, i32 1, %class.TC* @tci, null} ; [ DW_TAG_variable ] [tci]
// CHECK: [[TC:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[TCARGS:![0-9]*]]} ; [ DW_TAG_class_type ] [TC<int, 2, &glb, &foo::e, &foo::f, nullptr>]
// CHECK: [[TCARGS]] = metadata !{metadata [[TCARG1:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCARG2:![0-9]*]]}
// CHECK: [[TC:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[TCARGS:![0-9]*]]} ; [ DW_TAG_class_type ] [TC<unsigned int, 2, &glb, &foo::e, &foo::f>]
// CHECK: [[TCARGS]] = metadata !{metadata [[TCARG1:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCARG2:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCARG3:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCARG4:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCARG5:![0-9]*]]}
//
// We seem to be missing file/line/col info on template value parameters -
// metadata supports it but it's not populated.
// metadata supports it but it's not populated. GCC doesn't emit it either,
// perhaps we should just drop it from the metadata.
//
// CHECK: [[TCARG1]] = {{.*}}metadata !"T", metadata [[INT]], {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_type_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[TCARG2]] = {{.*}}metadata !"", metadata [[UINT:![0-9]*]], i64 2, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[UINT]] = {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [unsigned int]
// CHECK: [[TCARG1]] = {{.*}}metadata !"T", metadata [[UINT:![0-9]*]], {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_type_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[UINT:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [unsigned int]
// CHECK: [[TCARG2]] = {{.*}}metadata !"", metadata [[UINT:![0-9]*]], i32 2, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[TCARG3]] = {{.*}}metadata !"x", metadata [[INTPTR:![0-9]*]], i32* @glb, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[INTPTR]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[INT]]} ; [ DW_TAG_pointer_type ] [line 0, size 64, align 64, offset 0] [from int]
// CHECK: [[TCARG4]] = {{.*}}metadata !"a", metadata [[MEMINTPTR:![0-9]*]], i64 8, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[MEMINTPTR]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[FOO:![0-9]*]]} ; [ DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type ] {{.*}}[from int]
//
// We could just emit a declaration of 'foo' here, rather than the entire
// definition (same goes for any time we emit a member (function or data)
// pointer type)
// CHECK: [[FOO]] = {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_structure_type ] [foo]
// CHECK: metadata !"f", metadata !"_ZN3foo1fEv", i32 {{[0-9]*}}, metadata [[FTYPE:![0-9]*]],
// CHECK: [[FTYPE:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[FARGS:![0-9]*]], i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
// CHECK: [[FARGS]] = metadata !{null, metadata [[FARG1:![0-9]*]]}
// CHECK: [[FARG1]] = {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_pointer_type ] [line 0, size 64, align 64, offset 0] [artificial] [from foo]
//
// Currently Clang emits the pointer-to-member-function value, but LLVM doesn't
// use it (GCC doesn't emit a value for pointers to member functions either - so
// it's not clear what, if any, format would be acceptable to GDB)
//
// CHECK: [[TCARG5]] = {{.*}}metadata !"b", metadata [[MEMFUNPTR:![0-9]*]], { i64, i64 } { i64 ptrtoint (void (%struct.foo*)* @_ZN3foo1fEv to i64), i64 0 }, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[MEMFUNPTR]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[FTYPE]], metadata [[FOO]]} ; [ DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type ]
// CHECK: metadata [[TCNT:![0-9]*]], i32 0, i32 1, %class.TC.0* @tcn, null} ; [ DW_TAG_variable ] [tcn]
// CHECK: [[TCNT:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[TCNARGS:![0-9]*]]} ; [ DW_TAG_class_type ] [TC<int, -3, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr>]
// CHECK: [[TCNARGS]] = metadata !{metadata [[TCNARG1:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCNARG2:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCNARG3:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCNARG4:![0-9]*]], metadata [[TCNARG5:![0-9]*]]}
// CHECK: [[TCNARG1]] = {{.*}}metadata !"T", metadata [[INT]], {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_type_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[TCNARG2]] = {{.*}}metadata !"", metadata [[INT]], i32 -3, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// CHECK: [[TCNARG3]] = {{.*}}metadata !"x", metadata [[INTPTR]], i8 0, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
// The interesting null pointer: -1 for member data pointers (since they are
// just an offset in an object, they can be zero and non-null for the first
// member)
// CHECK: [[TCNARG4]] = {{.*}}metadata !"a", metadata [[MEMINTPTR]], i64 -1, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
//
// In some future iteration we could possibly emit the value of a null member
// function pointer as '{ i64, i64 } zeroinitializer' as it may be handled
// naturally from the LLVM CodeGen side once we decide how to handle non-null
// member function pointers. For now, it's simpler just to emit the 'i8 0'.
//
// CHECK: [[TCNARG5]] = {{.*}}metadata !"b", metadata [[MEMFUNPTR:![0-9]*]], i8 0, {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_template_value_parameter ]
struct foo {
char pad[8]; // make the member pointer to 'e' a bit more interesting (nonzero)
int e;
void f();
};
template<typename T, unsigned, int *x, int foo::*a, void (foo::*b)(), int *n>
template<typename T, T, int *x, int foo::*a, void (foo::*b)()>
class TC {
};
int glb;
TC<int, 2, &glb, &foo::e, &foo::f, nullptr> tci;
TC<unsigned, 2, &glb, &foo::e, &foo::f> tci;
TC<int, -3, nullptr, nullptr, nullptr> tcn;