name change: isPow2DivCheap -> isPow2SDivCheap

isPow2DivCheap

That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.

Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:

   srl/add/sra

is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':

   sra/srl/add/sra

That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.

This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.

No functional change intended.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010

llvm-svn: 216237

llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h

@@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ public:
     return BypassSlowDivWidths;
   }
 
-  /// Return true if pow2 div is cheaper than a chain of srl/add/sra.
-  bool isPow2DivCheap() const { return Pow2DivIsCheap; }
+  /// Return true if pow2 sdiv is cheaper than a chain of sra/srl/add/sra.
+  bool isPow2SDivCheap() const { return Pow2SDivIsCheap; }
 
   /// Return true if Flow Control is an expensive operation that should be
   /// avoided.
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ protected:
     BypassSlowDivWidths[SlowBitWidth] = FastBitWidth;
   }
 
-  /// Tells the code generator that it shouldn't generate srl/add/sra for a
-  /// signed divide by power of two, and let the target handle it.
-  void setPow2DivIsCheap(bool isCheap = true) { Pow2DivIsCheap = isCheap; }
+  /// Tells the code generator that it shouldn't generate sra/srl/add/sra for a
+  /// signed divide by power of two; let the target handle it.
+  void setPow2SDivIsCheap(bool isCheap = true) { Pow2SDivIsCheap = isCheap; }
 
   /// Add the specified register class as an available regclass for the
   /// specified value type. This indicates the selector can handle values of
@@ -1526,9 +1526,9 @@ private:
   /// div/rem when the operands are positive and less than 256.
   DenseMap <unsigned int, unsigned int> BypassSlowDivWidths;
 
-  /// Tells the code generator that it shouldn't generate srl/add/sra for a
-  /// signed divide by power of two, and let the target handle it.
-  bool Pow2DivIsCheap;
+  /// Tells the code generator that it shouldn't generate sra/srl/add/sra for a
+  /// signed divide by power of two; let the target handle it.
+  bool Pow2SDivIsCheap;
 
   /// Tells the code generator that it shouldn't generate extra flow control
   /// instructions and should attempt to combine flow control instructions via

llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

@@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSDIV(SDNode *N) {
                                      (-N1C->getAPIntValue()).isPowerOf2())) {
     // If dividing by powers of two is cheap, then don't perform the following
     // fold.
-    if (TLI.isPow2DivCheap())
+    if (TLI.isPow2SDivCheap())
       return SDValue();
 
     // Target-specific implementation of sdiv x, pow2.

llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp

@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ TargetLoweringBase::TargetLoweringBase(const TargetMachine &tm,
   HasMultipleConditionRegisters = false;
   HasExtractBitsInsn = false;
   IntDivIsCheap = false;
-  Pow2DivIsCheap = false;
+  Pow2SDivIsCheap = false;
   JumpIsExpensive = false;
   PredictableSelectIsExpensive = false;
   MaskAndBranchFoldingIsLegal = false;

llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static TargetLoweringObjectFile *createTLOF(const Triple &TT) {
 PPCTargetLowering::PPCTargetLowering(PPCTargetMachine &TM)
     : TargetLowering(TM, createTLOF(Triple(TM.getTargetTriple()))),
       Subtarget(*TM.getSubtargetImpl()) {
-  setPow2DivIsCheap();
+  setPow2SDivIsCheap();
 
   // Use _setjmp/_longjmp instead of setjmp/longjmp.
   setUseUnderscoreSetJmp(true);

llvm/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp

@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ AMDGPUTargetLowering::AMDGPUTargetLowering(TargetMachine &TM) :
   // There are no integer divide instructions, and these expand to a pretty
   // large sequence of instructions.
   setIntDivIsCheap(false);
-  setPow2DivIsCheap(false);
+  setPow2SDivIsCheap(false);
 
   // TODO: Investigate this when 64-bit divides are implemented.
   addBypassSlowDiv(64, 32);