forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager
Summary: Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager BreakCriticalEdges tries to keep LoopInfo and DominatorTree updated if they exist. However, since commit r321653 and r321805, to update LoopInfo we must have a DominatorTree, or we will hit an assert. To fix this we now make a couple of passes that only required/preserved LoopInfo also require DominatorTree. This solves PR37334. Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46829 llvm-svn: 332583
This commit is contained in:
parent
b48d65ca75
commit
2ca16899ec
|
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
|
|||
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h"
|
||||
|
@ -1001,6 +1002,10 @@ void BranchProbabilityInfo::calculate(const Function &F, const LoopInfo &LI,
|
|||
|
||||
void BranchProbabilityInfoWrapperPass::getAnalysisUsage(
|
||||
AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
||||
// We require DT so it's available when LI is available. The LI updating code
|
||||
// asserts that DT is also present so if we don't make sure that we have DT
|
||||
// here, that assert will trigger.
|
||||
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
|
|||
#include "llvm/Analysis/LazyBlockFrequencyInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/LazyBranchProbabilityInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
||||
|
||||
using namespace llvm;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -41,6 +42,10 @@ void LazyBlockFrequencyInfoPass::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const {
|
|||
|
||||
void LazyBlockFrequencyInfoPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
||||
LazyBranchProbabilityInfoPass::getLazyBPIAnalysisUsage(AU);
|
||||
// We require DT so it's available when LI is available. The LI updating code
|
||||
// asserts that DT is also present so if we don't make sure that we have DT
|
||||
// here, that assert will trigger.
|
||||
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
|
|||
#include "llvm/Analysis/LazyBranchProbabilityInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
||||
|
||||
using namespace llvm;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -42,6 +43,10 @@ void LazyBranchProbabilityInfoPass::print(raw_ostream &OS,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void LazyBranchProbabilityInfoPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
||||
// We require DT so it's available when LI is available. The LI updating code
|
||||
// asserts that DT is also present so if we don't make sure that we have DT
|
||||
// here, that assert will trigger.
|
||||
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>();
|
||||
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
|
||||
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-sink -break-crit-edges -branch-prob -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-sink -break-crit-edges -lazy-block-freq -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-sink -break-crit-edges -lazy-branch-prob -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; BreakCriticalEdges tries to update LI and DT if they are present. However,
|
||||
; updating LI actually needs a DT, so we now require DT in
|
||||
; BranchProbabilityInfo/LazyBlockFrequencyInfo/LazyBranchProbabilityInfo so it
|
||||
; is indeed available when LI is.
|
||||
|
||||
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
|
||||
|
||||
define void @f1() {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @f1(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 false, label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_FOR_END_CRIT_EDGE:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.cond.for.end_crit_edge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_END:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.body:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label [[FOR_ENDSPLIT:%.*]], label [[FOR_INC:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.inc:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_COND]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.endsplit:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_END]]
|
||||
; CHECK: for.end:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
|
||||
br i1 undef, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
||||
|
||||
for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
|
||||
br i1 undef, label %for.end, label %for.inc
|
||||
|
||||
for.inc: ; preds = %for.body
|
||||
br label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
for.end: ; preds = %for.body, %for.cond
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue