From 2a4344537c7450283152061c9b0535e171d14f51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 20:08:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [X86] Regenerate PR14088 test. NFCI.

llvm-svn: 336496
---
 llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr14088.ll | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr14088.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr14088.ll
index 16f20d0500a1..2e2c05c47f22 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr14088.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr14088.ll
@@ -1,5 +1,42 @@
-; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-linux -mcpu core2 -verify-machineinstrs %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-linux -mcpu=core2 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
+
+; We were miscompiling this and using %ax instead of %cx in the movw
+; in the following sequence:
+;	movswl	%cx, %ecx
+;	movw	%cx, (%rsi)
+;	movslq	%ecx, %rcx
+;
+; We can't produce the above sequence without special SD-level
+; heuristics. Now we produce this:
+
 define i32 @f(i1 %foo, i16* %tm_year2, i8* %bar, i16 %zed, i32 %zed2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: f:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movl $-1, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    testb $1, %dil
+; CHECK-NEXT:    jne .LBB0_2
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.1: # %if.end
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movslq %r8d, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    imulq $1374389535, %rax, %rcx # imm = 0x51EB851F
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rcx, %rdi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    shrq $63, %rdi
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sarq $37, %rcx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addl %edi, %ecx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    imull $100, %ecx, %ecx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    subl %ecx, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movw %ax, (%rsi)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    cwtl
+; CHECK-NEXT:    cltq
+; CHECK-NEXT:    imulq $1717986919, %rax, %rax # imm = 0x66666667
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movq %rax, %rcx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    shrq $63, %rcx
+; CHECK-NEXT:    shrq $34, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addl %ecx, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT:    movb %al, (%rdx)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    xorl %eax, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_2: # %return
+; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
 entry:
   br i1 %foo, label %return, label %if.end
 
@@ -18,15 +55,3 @@ return:
   %retval.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %if.end ], [ -1, %entry ]
   ret i32 %retval.0
 }
-
-; We were miscompiling this and using %ax instead of %cx in the movw
-; in the following sequence:
-;	movswl	%cx, %ecx
-;	movw	%cx, (%rsi)
-;	movslq	%ecx, %rcx
-;
-; We can't produce the above sequence without special SD-level
-; heuristics. Now we produce this:
-; CHECK: movw	%ax, (%rsi)
-; CHECK: cwtl
-; CHECK: cltq