forked from OSchip/llvm-project
parent
1ab5ea564f
commit
28ac01bfc8
|
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
|
|||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2466">2466</a></td><td><tt>allocator_traits::max_size()</tt> default behavior is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2469">2469</a></td><td>Wrong specification of Requires clause of <tt>operator[]</tt> for <tt>map</tt> and <tt>unordered_map</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2473">2473</a></td><td><tt>basic_filebuf</tt>'s relation to C <tt>FILE</tt> semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2476">2476</a></td><td><tt>scoped_allocator_adaptor</tt> is not assignable</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2476">2476</a></td><td><tt>scoped_allocator_adaptor</tt> is not assignable</td><td>Kona</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2477">2477</a></td><td>Inconsistency of wordings in <tt>std::vector::erase()</tt> and <tt>std::deque::erase()</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2483">2483</a></td><td><tt>throw_with_nested()</tt> should use <tt>is_final</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2484">2484</a></td><td><tt>rethrow_if_nested()</tt> is doubly unimplementable</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
|
||||
|
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
|
|||
<li><i>2466 - Simple change; need a test.</i> <b>Patch Available</b></li>
|
||||
<li>2469 - This is a followon to 2464, which we're done. This restates a bunch of operations in terms of newer ops. Probably refactoring to do here, but tests shouldn't change.</li>
|
||||
<li><i>2473 - There are two changes here; one to <tt>filebuf::seekpos</tt> and the other to <tt>filebuf::sync</tt>. We do both of these already.</i></li>
|
||||
<li>2476 - Simple change; need tests.</li>
|
||||
<li><I>2476 - Just needed tests.</i> <b>Patch Available</b></li>
|
||||
<li>2477 - Definitely wording cleanup, but check the tests.</li>
|
||||
<li><i>2483 - We already do this.</i></li>
|
||||
<li><i>2484 - We already do this.</i></li>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue