forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Make ParentMap work with explicit specializations of function templates.
For an explicit specialization, we first build a FunctionDecl, and then we call SubstDecl() on it to build a second FunctionDecl, which has the first FunctionDecl as canonical decl. The address of an explicit specialization of function template used to be the canonical decl of the FunctionDecl. This is different from all the other DeduceTemplateArguments() calls in SemaOverload, and since the canonical decl isn't visited by ParentMap while the redecl is, it also made ParentMap assert when computing the parent of a address-of-explicit-specialization-fun-template. To fix, remove the getCanonicalDecl() call. No behavior difference for clang, but it fixes an assert in ParentMap (which is e.g. used by libTooling). llvm-svn: 260159
This commit is contained in:
parent
06dacd851f
commit
26911c7733
|
@ -10339,7 +10339,6 @@ private:
|
|||
// Template argument deduction ensures that we have an exact match or
|
||||
// compatible pointer-to-function arguments that would be adjusted by ICS.
|
||||
// This function template specicalization works.
|
||||
Specialization = cast<FunctionDecl>(Specialization->getCanonicalDecl());
|
||||
assert(S.isSameOrCompatibleFunctionType(
|
||||
Context.getCanonicalType(Specialization->getType()),
|
||||
Context.getCanonicalType(TargetFunctionType)));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4333,6 +4333,13 @@ TEST(HasAncestor, NonParmDependentTemplateParmVarDeclRefExpr) {
|
|||
declRefExpr(to(decl(hasAncestor(decl()))))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(HasAncestor, AddressOfExplicitSpecializationFunction) {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(matches("template <class T> void f();\n"
|
||||
"template <> void f<int>();\n"
|
||||
"void (*get_f())() { return f<int>; }\n",
|
||||
declRefExpr(to(decl(hasAncestor(decl()))))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(HasParent, MatchesAllParents) {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(matches(
|
||||
"template <typename T> struct C { static void f() { 42; } };"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue