maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

[PowerPC] Revert ppc64le-aggregates.ll test changes from r227053 

It appears we have different behavior with and without -mcpu=pwr8 even
with ppc64le defaulting to POWER8.  The failure appears as follows:

/home/bb/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64le-aggregates.ll:268:14: error: expected string not found in input
; CHECK-DAG: lfs 1, 0([[REG]])
             ^
<stdin>:497:11: note: scanning from here
 ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
          ^
<stdin>:497:11: note: with variable "REG" equal to "3"
 ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
          ^
<stdin>:514:2: note: possible intended match here
 lfs 1, 0(4)
 ^

Reverting this particular test case change.  Nemanja, please have a look
at the reason for the failure.

llvm-svn: 227055
This commit is contained in:
Bill Schmidt 2015-01-25 18:18:54 +00:00
parent 3f500fa2f6
commit 258ac3cc56
1 changed files with 0 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64le-aggregates.ll
View File

@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
; RUN: llc < %s -march=ppc64le -mcpu=pwr8 -mattr=+altivec -mattr=-vsx | FileCheck %s
; RUN: llc < %s -march=ppc64le -mattr=+altivec -mattr=-vsx | FileCheck %s
; Currently VSX support is disabled for this test because we generate lxsdx
; instead of lfd, and stxsdx instead of stfd. That is a poor choice when we
; have reg+imm addressing, and is on the list of things to be fixed.
; The second run of the test case is to ensure the behaviour is the same
; without specifying -mcpu=pwr8 as that is now the baseline for ppc64le.
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-n32:64"
target triple = "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu"