forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[SelectionDAG] Make sorting predicate stronger to remove non-deterministic ordering
Summary: Recommitting this with the correct sorting predicate. The Low field of Clusters is a ConstantInt and cannot be directly compared. So we needed to invoke slt (signed less than) to compare correctly. This fixes failures in the following tests uncovered by D39245: LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/ifcvt3.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/switch-minsize.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch-bt.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch-density.ll Reviewers: hans, fhahn Reviewed By: hans Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40541 llvm-svn: 319210
This commit is contained in:
parent
d49bd0cd87
commit
230b0a1477
|
@ -9350,10 +9350,12 @@ bool SelectionDAGBuilder::buildBitTests(CaseClusterVector &Clusters,
|
|||
|
||||
BitTestInfo BTI;
|
||||
std::sort(CBV.begin(), CBV.end(), [](const CaseBits &a, const CaseBits &b) {
|
||||
// Sort by probability first, number of bits second.
|
||||
// Sort by probability first, number of bits second, bit mask third.
|
||||
if (a.ExtraProb != b.ExtraProb)
|
||||
return a.ExtraProb > b.ExtraProb;
|
||||
return a.Bits > b.Bits;
|
||||
if (a.Bits != b.Bits)
|
||||
return a.Bits > b.Bits;
|
||||
return a.Mask < b.Mask;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto &CB : CBV) {
|
||||
|
@ -9542,10 +9544,15 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::lowerWorkItem(SwitchWorkListItem W, Value *Cond,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (TM.getOptLevel() != CodeGenOpt::None) {
|
||||
// Order cases by probability so the most likely case will be checked first.
|
||||
// Here, we order cases by probability so the most likely case will be
|
||||
// checked first. However, two clusters can have the same probability in
|
||||
// which case their relative ordering is non-deterministic. So we use Low
|
||||
// as a tie-breaker as clusters are guaranteed to never overlap.
|
||||
std::sort(W.FirstCluster, W.LastCluster + 1,
|
||||
[](const CaseCluster &a, const CaseCluster &b) {
|
||||
return a.Prob > b.Prob;
|
||||
return a.Prob != b.Prob ?
|
||||
a.Prob > b.Prob :
|
||||
a.Low->getValue().slt(b.Low->getValue());
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Rearrange the case blocks so that the last one falls through if possible
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue