[stack-protection] Add support for MSVC buffer security check

Summary:
This patch is adding support for the MSVC buffer security check implementation

The buffer security check is turned on with the '/GS' compiler switch.
  * https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8dbf701c.aspx
  * To be added to clang here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20347

Some overview of buffer security check feature and implementation:
  * https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa290051(VS.71).aspx
  * http://www.ksyash.com/2011/01/buffer-overflow-protection-3/
  * http://blog.osom.info/2012/02/understanding-vs-c-compilers-buffer.html


For the following example:
```
int example(int offset, int index) {
  char buffer[10];
  memset(buffer, 0xCC, index);
  return buffer[index];
}
```

The MSVC compiler is adding these instructions to perform stack integrity check:
```
        push        ebp  
        mov         ebp,esp  
        sub         esp,50h  
  [1]   mov         eax,dword ptr [__security_cookie (01068024h)]  
  [2]   xor         eax,ebp  
  [3]   mov         dword ptr [ebp-4],eax  
        push        ebx  
        push        esi  
        push        edi  
        mov         eax,dword ptr [index]  
        push        eax  
        push        0CCh  
        lea         ecx,[buffer]  
        push        ecx  
        call        _memset (010610B9h)  
        add         esp,0Ch  
        mov         eax,dword ptr [index]  
        movsx       eax,byte ptr buffer[eax]  
        pop         edi  
        pop         esi  
        pop         ebx  
  [4]   mov         ecx,dword ptr [ebp-4]  
  [5]   xor         ecx,ebp  
  [6]   call        @__security_check_cookie@4 (01061276h)  
        mov         esp,ebp  
        pop         ebp  
        ret  
```

The instrumentation above is:
  * [1] is loading the global security canary,
  * [3] is storing the local computed ([2]) canary to the guard slot,
  * [4] is loading the guard slot and ([5]) re-compute the global canary,
  * [6] is validating the resulting canary with the '__security_check_cookie' and performs error handling.

Overview of the current stack-protection implementation:
  * lib/CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp
    * There is a default stack-protection implementation applied on intermediate representation.
    * The target can overload 'getIRStackGuard' method if it has a standard location for the stack protector cookie.
    * An intrinsic 'Intrinsic::stackprotector' is added to the prologue. It will be expanded by the instruction selection pass (DAG or Fast).
    * Basic Blocks are added to every instrumented function to receive the code for handling stack guard validation and errors handling.
    * Guard manipulation and comparison are added directly to the intermediate representation.

  * lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
  * lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
    * There is an implementation that adds instrumentation during instruction selection (for better handling of sibbling calls).
      * see long comment above 'class StackProtectorDescriptor' declaration.
    * The target needs to override 'getSDagStackGuard' to activate SDAG stack protection generation. (note: getIRStackGuard MUST be nullptr).
      * 'getSDagStackGuard' returns the appropriate stack guard (security cookie)
    * The code is generated by 'SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp' and 'SelectionDAGISel.cpp'.

  * include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h
    * Contains function to retrieve the default Guard 'Value'; should be overriden by each target to select which implementation is used and provide Guard 'Value'.

  * lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    * Contains the x86 specialisation; Guard 'Value' used by the SelectionDAG algorithm.

Function-based Instrumentation:
  * The MSVC doesn't inline the stack guard comparison in every function. Instead, a call to '__security_check_cookie' is added to the epilogue before every return instructions.
  * To support function-based instrumentation, this patch is
    * adding a function to get the function-based check (llvm 'Value', see include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h),
      * If provided, the stack protection instrumentation won't be inlined and a call to that function will be added to the prologue.
    * modifying (SelectionDAGISel.cpp) do avoid producing basic blocks used for inline instrumentation,
    * generating the function-based instrumentation during the ISEL pass (SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp),
    * if FastISEL (not SelectionDAG), using the fallback which rely on the same function-based implemented over intermediate representation (StackProtector.cpp).

Modifications
  * adding support for MSVC (lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp)
  * adding support function-based instrumentation (lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp, .h)

Results

  * IR generated instrumentation:
```
clang-cl /GS test.cc /Od /c -mllvm -print-isel-input
```

```
*** Final LLVM Code input to ISel ***

; Function Attrs: nounwind sspstrong
define i32 @"\01?example@@YAHHH@Z"(i32 %offset, i32 %index) #0 {
entry:
  %StackGuardSlot = alloca i8*                                                  <<<-- Allocated guard slot
  %0 = call i8* @llvm.stackguard()                                              <<<-- Loading Stack Guard value
  call void @llvm.stackprotector(i8* %0, i8** %StackGuardSlot)                  <<<-- Prologue intrinsic call (store to Guard slot)
  %index.addr = alloca i32, align 4
  %offset.addr = alloca i32, align 4
  %buffer = alloca [10 x i8], align 1
  store i32 %index, i32* %index.addr, align 4
  store i32 %offset, i32* %offset.addr, align 4
  %arraydecay = getelementptr inbounds [10 x i8], [10 x i8]* %buffer, i32 0, i32 0
  %1 = load i32, i32* %index.addr, align 4
  call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i32(i8* %arraydecay, i8 -52, i32 %1, i32 1, i1 false)
  %2 = load i32, i32* %index.addr, align 4
  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [10 x i8], [10 x i8]* %buffer, i32 0, i32 %2
  %3 = load i8, i8* %arrayidx, align 1
  %conv = sext i8 %3 to i32
  %4 = load volatile i8*, i8** %StackGuardSlot                                  <<<-- Loading Guard slot
  call void @__security_check_cookie(i8* %4)                                    <<<-- Epilogue function-based check
  ret i32 %conv
}
```

  * SelectionDAG generated instrumentation:

```
clang-cl /GS test.cc /O1 /c /FA
```

```
"?example@@YAHHH@Z":                    # @"\01?example@@YAHHH@Z"
# BB#0:                                 # %entry
        pushl   %esi
        subl    $16, %esp
        movl    ___security_cookie, %eax                                        <<<-- Loading Stack Guard value
        movl    28(%esp), %esi
        movl    %eax, 12(%esp)                                                  <<<-- Store to Guard slot
        leal    2(%esp), %eax
        pushl   %esi
        pushl   $204
        pushl   %eax
        calll   _memset
        addl    $12, %esp
        movsbl  2(%esp,%esi), %esi
        movl    12(%esp), %ecx                                                  <<<-- Loading Guard slot
        calll   @__security_check_cookie@4                                      <<<-- Epilogue function-based check
        movl    %esi, %eax
        addl    $16, %esp
        popl    %esi
        retl
```

Reviewers: kcc, pcc, eugenis, rnk

Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits, hans, thakis, rnk

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20346

llvm-svn: 272053
This commit is contained in:
Etienne Bergeron 2016-06-07 20:15:35 +00:00
parent 918a92881b
commit 22bfa83208
11 changed files with 668 additions and 41 deletions

View File

@ -1078,8 +1078,8 @@ public:
/// LOAD_STACK_GUARD, or customize @llvm.stackguard().
virtual Value *getIRStackGuard(IRBuilder<> &IRB) const;
/// Inserts necessary declarations for SSP purpose. Should be used only when
/// getIRStackGuard returns nullptr.
/// Inserts necessary declarations for SSP (stack protection) purpose.
/// Should be used only when getIRStackGuard returns nullptr.
virtual void insertSSPDeclarations(Module &M) const;
/// Return the variable that's previously inserted by insertSSPDeclarations,
@ -1087,6 +1087,12 @@ public:
/// getIRStackGuard returns nullptr.
virtual Value *getSDagStackGuard(const Module &M) const;
/// If the target has a standard stack protection check function that
/// performs validation and error handling, returns the function. Otherwise,
/// returns nullptr. Must be previously inserted by insertSSPDeclarations.
/// Should be used only when getIRStackGuard returns nullptr.
virtual Value *getSSPStackGuardCheck(const Module &M) const;
/// If the target has a standard location for the unsafe stack pointer,
/// returns the address of that location. Otherwise, returns nullptr.
virtual Value *getSafeStackPointerLocation(IRBuilder<> &IRB) const;

View File

@ -2040,6 +2040,40 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSPDescriptorParent(StackProtectorDescriptor &SPD,
const Module &M = *ParentBB->getParent()->getFunction()->getParent();
unsigned Align = DL->getPrefTypeAlignment(Type::getInt8PtrTy(M.getContext()));
// Generate code to load the content of the guard slot.
SDValue StackSlot = DAG.getLoad(
PtrTy, dl, DAG.getEntryNode(), StackSlotPtr,
MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(DAG.getMachineFunction(), FI), true,
false, false, Align);
// Retrieve guard check function, nullptr if instrumentation is inlined.
if (const Value *GuardCheck = TLI.getSSPStackGuardCheck(M)) {
// The target provides a guard check function to validate the guard value.
// Generate a call to that function with the content of the guard slot as
// argument.
auto *Fn = cast<Function>(GuardCheck);
FunctionType *FnTy = Fn->getFunctionType();
assert(FnTy->getNumParams() == 1 && "Invalid function signature");
TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args;
TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry;
Entry.Node = StackSlot;
Entry.Ty = FnTy->getParamType(0);
if (Fn->hasAttribute(1, Attribute::AttrKind::InReg))
Entry.isInReg = true;
Args.push_back(Entry);
TargetLowering::CallLoweringInfo CLI(DAG);
CLI.setDebugLoc(getCurSDLoc())
.setChain(DAG.getEntryNode())
.setCallee(Fn->getCallingConv(), FnTy->getReturnType(),
getValue(GuardCheck), std::move(Args));
std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> Result = TLI.LowerCallTo(CLI);
DAG.setRoot(Result.second);
return;
}
// If useLoadStackGuardNode returns true, generate LOAD_STACK_GUARD.
// Otherwise, emit a volatile load to retrieve the stack guard value.
SDValue Chain = DAG.getEntryNode();
@ -2054,11 +2088,6 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSPDescriptorParent(StackProtectorDescriptor &SPD,
true, false, false, Align);
}
SDValue StackSlot = DAG.getLoad(
PtrTy, dl, DAG.getEntryNode(), StackSlotPtr,
MachinePointerInfo::getFixedStack(DAG.getMachineFunction(), FI), true,
false, false, Align);
// Perform the comparison via a subtract/getsetcc.
EVT VT = Guard.getValueType();
SDValue Sub = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, VT, Guard, StackSlot);

View File

@ -456,7 +456,14 @@ private:
///
/// c. After we finish selecting the basic block, in FinishBasicBlock if
/// the StackProtectorDescriptor attached to the SelectionDAGBuilder is
/// initialized, we first find a splice point in the parent basic block
/// initialized, we produce the validation code with one of these
/// techniques:
/// 1) with a call to a guard check function
/// 2) with inlined instrumentation
///
/// 1) We insert a call to the check function before the terminator.
///
/// 2) We first find a splice point in the parent basic block
/// before the terminator and then splice the terminator of said basic
/// block into the success basic block. Then we code-gen a new tail for
/// the parent basic block consisting of the two loads, the comparison,
@ -475,15 +482,22 @@ private:
return ParentMBB && SuccessMBB && FailureMBB;
}
bool shouldEmitFunctionBasedCheckStackProtector() const {
return ParentMBB && !SuccessMBB && !FailureMBB;
}
/// Initialize the stack protector descriptor structure for a new basic
/// block.
void initialize(const BasicBlock *BB, MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
void initialize(const BasicBlock *BB, MachineBasicBlock *MBB,
bool FunctionBasedInstrumentation) {
// Make sure we are not initialized yet.
assert(!shouldEmitStackProtector() && "Stack Protector Descriptor is "
"already initialized!");
ParentMBB = MBB;
SuccessMBB = AddSuccessorMBB(BB, MBB, /* IsLikely */ true);
FailureMBB = AddSuccessorMBB(BB, MBB, /* IsLikely */ false, FailureMBB);
if (!FunctionBasedInstrumentation) {
SuccessMBB = AddSuccessorMBB(BB, MBB, /* IsLikely */ true);
FailureMBB = AddSuccessorMBB(BB, MBB, /* IsLikely */ false, FailureMBB);
}
}
/// Reset state that changes when we handle different basic blocks.

View File

@ -1463,8 +1463,12 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::SelectAllBasicBlocks(const Function &Fn) {
LowerArguments(Fn);
}
}
if (getAnalysis<StackProtector>().shouldEmitSDCheck(*LLVMBB))
SDB->SPDescriptor.initialize(LLVMBB, FuncInfo->MBBMap[LLVMBB]);
if (getAnalysis<StackProtector>().shouldEmitSDCheck(*LLVMBB)) {
bool FunctionBasedInstrumentation =
TLI->getSSPStackGuardCheck(*Fn.getParent());
SDB->SPDescriptor.initialize(LLVMBB, FuncInfo->MBBMap[LLVMBB],
FunctionBasedInstrumentation);
}
if (Begin != BI)
++NumDAGBlocks;
@ -1552,7 +1556,7 @@ static bool MIIsInTerminatorSequence(const MachineInstr *MI) {
/// terminator, but additionally the copies that move the vregs into the
/// physical registers.
static MachineBasicBlock::iterator
FindSplitPointForStackProtector(MachineBasicBlock *BB, DebugLoc DL) {
FindSplitPointForStackProtector(MachineBasicBlock *BB) {
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitPoint = BB->getFirstTerminator();
//
if (SplitPoint == BB->begin())
@ -1593,7 +1597,23 @@ SelectionDAGISel::FinishBasicBlock() {
}
// Handle stack protector.
if (SDB->SPDescriptor.shouldEmitStackProtector()) {
if (SDB->SPDescriptor.shouldEmitFunctionBasedCheckStackProtector()) {
// The target provides a guard check function. There is no need to
// generate error handling code or to split current basic block.
MachineBasicBlock *ParentMBB = SDB->SPDescriptor.getParentMBB();
// Add load and check to the basicblock.
FuncInfo->MBB = ParentMBB;
FuncInfo->InsertPt =
FindSplitPointForStackProtector(ParentMBB);
SDB->visitSPDescriptorParent(SDB->SPDescriptor, ParentMBB);
CurDAG->setRoot(SDB->getRoot());
SDB->clear();
CodeGenAndEmitDAG();
// Clear the Per-BB State.
SDB->SPDescriptor.resetPerBBState();
} else if (SDB->SPDescriptor.shouldEmitStackProtector()) {
MachineBasicBlock *ParentMBB = SDB->SPDescriptor.getParentMBB();
MachineBasicBlock *SuccessMBB = SDB->SPDescriptor.getSuccessMBB();
@ -1604,7 +1624,7 @@ SelectionDAGISel::FinishBasicBlock() {
// register allocation issues caused by us splitting the parent mbb. The
// register allocator will clean up said virtual copies later on.
MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitPoint =
FindSplitPointForStackProtector(ParentMBB, SDB->getCurDebugLoc());
FindSplitPointForStackProtector(ParentMBB);
// Splice the terminator of ParentMBB into SuccessMBB.
SuccessMBB->splice(SuccessMBB->end(), ParentMBB,

View File

@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/EHPersonalities.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Analysis.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
@ -95,11 +96,19 @@ bool StackProtector::runOnFunction(Function &Fn) {
Attribute Attr = Fn.getFnAttribute("stack-protector-buffer-size");
if (Attr.isStringAttribute() &&
Attr.getValueAsString().getAsInteger(10, SSPBufferSize))
return false; // Invalid integer string
return false; // Invalid integer string
if (!RequiresStackProtector())
return false;
// TODO(etienneb): Functions with funclets are not correctly supported now.
// Do nothing if this is funclet-based personality.
if (Fn.hasPersonalityFn()) {
EHPersonality Personality = classifyEHPersonality(Fn.getPersonalityFn());
if (isFuncletEHPersonality(Personality))
return false;
}
++NumFunProtected;
return InsertStackProtectors();
}
@ -313,9 +322,9 @@ static bool CreatePrologue(Function *F, Module *M, ReturnInst *RI,
PointerType *PtrTy = Type::getInt8PtrTy(RI->getContext());
AI = B.CreateAlloca(PtrTy, nullptr, "StackGuardSlot");
Value *Guard = getStackGuard(TLI, M, B, &SupportsSelectionDAGSP);
Value *GuardSlot = getStackGuard(TLI, M, B, &SupportsSelectionDAGSP);
B.CreateCall(Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::stackprotector),
{Guard, AI});
{GuardSlot, AI});
return SupportsSelectionDAGSP;
}
@ -336,12 +345,36 @@ bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() {
if (!RI)
continue;
// Generate prologue instrumentation if not already generated.
if (!HasPrologue) {
HasPrologue = true;
SupportsSelectionDAGSP &= CreatePrologue(F, M, RI, TLI, AI);
}
if (!SupportsSelectionDAGSP) {
// SelectionDAG based code generation. Nothing else needs to be done here.
// The epilogue instrumentation is postponed to SelectionDAG.
if (SupportsSelectionDAGSP)
break;
// Set HasIRCheck to true, so that SelectionDAG will not generate its own
// version. SelectionDAG called 'shouldEmitSDCheck' to check whether
// instrumentation has already been generated.
HasIRCheck = true;
// Generate epilogue instrumentation. The epilogue intrumentation can be
// function-based or inlined depending on which mechanism the target is
// providing.
if (Value* GuardCheck = TLI->getSSPStackGuardCheck(*M)) {
// Generate the function-based epilogue instrumentation.
// The target provides a guard check function, generate a call to it.
IRBuilder<> B(RI);
LoadInst *Guard = B.CreateLoad(AI, true, "Guard");
CallInst *Call = B.CreateCall(GuardCheck, {Guard});
llvm::Function *Function = cast<llvm::Function>(GuardCheck);
Call->setAttributes(Function->getAttributes());
Call->setCallingConv(Function->getCallingConv());
} else {
// Generate the epilogue with inline instrumentation.
// If we do not support SelectionDAG based tail calls, generate IR level
// tail calls.
//
@ -372,10 +405,6 @@ bool StackProtector::InsertStackProtectors() {
// fail BB generated by the stack protector pseudo instruction.
BasicBlock *FailBB = CreateFailBB();
// Set HasIRCheck to true, so that SelectionDAG will not generate its own
// version.
HasIRCheck = true;
// Split the basic block before the return instruction.
BasicBlock *NewBB = BB->splitBasicBlock(RI->getIterator(), "SP_return");

View File

@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ void TargetLoweringBase::initActions() {
setOperationAction(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG, VT, Expand);
}
// For most targets @llvm.get.dynamic.area.offest just returns 0.
// For most targets @llvm.get.dynamic.area.offset just returns 0.
setOperationAction(ISD::GET_DYNAMIC_AREA_OFFSET, VT, Expand);
}
@ -1833,3 +1833,7 @@ void TargetLoweringBase::insertSSPDeclarations(Module &M) const {
Value *TargetLoweringBase::getSDagStackGuard(const Module &M) const {
return M.getGlobalVariable("__stack_chk_guard");
}
Value *TargetLoweringBase::getSSPStackGuardCheck(const Module &M) const {
return nullptr;
}

View File

@ -1974,8 +1974,39 @@ Value *X86TargetLowering::getIRStackGuard(IRBuilder<> &IRB) const {
}
void X86TargetLowering::insertSSPDeclarations(Module &M) const {
if (!Subtarget.isTargetGlibc())
TargetLowering::insertSSPDeclarations(M);
// MSVC CRT provides functionalities for stack protection.
if (Subtarget.getTargetTriple().isOSMSVCRT()) {
// MSVC CRT has a global variable holding security cookie.
M.getOrInsertGlobal("__security_cookie",
Type::getInt8PtrTy(M.getContext()));
// MSVC CRT has a function to validate security cookie.
auto *SecurityCheckCookie = cast<Function>(
M.getOrInsertFunction("__security_check_cookie",
Type::getVoidTy(M.getContext()),
Type::getInt8PtrTy(M.getContext()), nullptr));
SecurityCheckCookie->setCallingConv(CallingConv::X86_FastCall);
SecurityCheckCookie->addAttribute(1, Attribute::AttrKind::InReg);
return;
}
// glibc has a special slot for the stack guard.
if (Subtarget.isTargetGlibc())
return;
TargetLowering::insertSSPDeclarations(M);
}
Value *X86TargetLowering::getSDagStackGuard(const Module &M) const {
// MSVC CRT has a global variable holding security cookie.
if (Subtarget.getTargetTriple().isOSMSVCRT())
return M.getGlobalVariable("__security_cookie");
return TargetLowering::getSDagStackGuard(M);
}
Value *X86TargetLowering::getSSPStackGuardCheck(const Module &M) const {
// MSVC CRT has a function to validate security cookie.
if (Subtarget.getTargetTriple().isOSMSVCRT())
return M.getFunction("__security_check_cookie");
return TargetLowering::getSSPStackGuardCheck(M);
}
Value *X86TargetLowering::getSafeStackPointerLocation(IRBuilder<> &IRB) const {

View File

@ -969,7 +969,10 @@ namespace llvm {
/// returns the address of that location. Otherwise, returns nullptr.
Value *getIRStackGuard(IRBuilder<> &IRB) const override;
bool useLoadStackGuardNode() const override;
void insertSSPDeclarations(Module &M) const override;
Value *getSDagStackGuard(const Module &M) const override;
Value *getSSPStackGuardCheck(const Module &M) const override;
/// Return true if the target stores SafeStack pointer at a fixed offset in
/// some non-standard address space, and populates the address space and
@ -981,7 +984,6 @@ namespace llvm {
bool isNoopAddrSpaceCast(unsigned SrcAS, unsigned DestAS) const override;
bool useLoadStackGuardNode() const override;
/// \brief Customize the preferred legalization strategy for certain types.
LegalizeTypeAction getPreferredVectorAction(EVT VT) const override;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
; RUN: llc -mtriple=i386-pc-windows-msvc < %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=MSVC-I386 %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc < %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=MSVC-64 %s
; MSVC-I386: movl ___security_cookie, %[[REG1:[a-z]*]]
; MSVC-I386: movl %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%esp)
; MSVC-I386: calll _strcpy
; MSVC-I386: movl [[SLOT]](%esp), %ecx
; MSVC-I386: calll @__security_check_cookie@4
; MSVC-I386: retl
; MSVC-64: movq __security_cookie(%rip), %[[REG1:[a-z]*]]
; MSVC-64: movq %[[REG1]], [[SLOT:[0-9]*]](%rsp)
; MSVC-64: callq strcpy
; MSVC-64: movq [[SLOT]](%rsp), %rcx
; MSVC-64: callq __security_check_cookie
@"\01LC" = internal constant [11 x i8] c"buf == %s\0A\00" ; <[11 x i8]*> [#uses=1]
define void @test(i8* %a) nounwind ssp {
entry:
%a_addr = alloca i8* ; <i8**> [#uses=2]
%buf = alloca [8 x i8] ; <[8 x i8]*> [#uses=2]
%"alloca point" = bitcast i32 0 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=0]
store i8* %a, i8** %a_addr
%buf1 = bitcast [8 x i8]* %buf to i8* ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%0 = load i8*, i8** %a_addr, align 4 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%1 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %buf1, i8* %0) nounwind ; <i8*> [#uses=0]
%buf2 = bitcast [8 x i8]* %buf to i8* ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%2 = call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr ([11 x i8], [11 x i8]* @"\01LC", i32 0, i32 0), i8* %buf2) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0]
br label %return
return: ; preds = %entry
ret void
}
declare i8* @strcpy(i8*, i8*) nounwind
declare i32 @printf(i8*, ...) nounwind

View File

@ -1,17 +1,31 @@
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=true %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SELDAG
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=false %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=IR
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=true %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DARWIN-SELDAG
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=false %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DARWIN-IR
; RUN: llc -mtriple=i386-pc-windows-msvc -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=true %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MSVC-SELDAG
; RUN: llc -mtriple=i386-pc-windows-msvc -print-machineinstrs=expand-isel-pseudos -enable-selectiondag-sp=false %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MSVC-IR
; SELDAG: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; SELDAG: Successors according to CFG: BB#[[SUCCESS:[0-9]+]]({{[0-9a-fx/= ]+}}100.00%) BB#[[FAILURE:[0-9]+]]
; SELDAG: BB#[[FAILURE]]:
; SELDAG: CALL64pcrel32 <es:__stack_chk_fail>
; SELDAG: BB#[[SUCCESS]]:
; DARWIN-SELDAG: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; DARWIN-SELDAG: Successors according to CFG: BB#[[SUCCESS:[0-9]+]]({{[0-9a-fx/= ]+}}100.00%) BB#[[FAILURE:[0-9]+]]
; DARWIN-SELDAG: BB#[[FAILURE]]:
; DARWIN-SELDAG: CALL64pcrel32 <es:__stack_chk_fail>
; DARWIN-SELDAG: BB#[[SUCCESS]]:
; IR: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; IR: Successors according to CFG: BB#[[SUCCESS:[0-9]+]]({{[0-9a-fx/= ]+}}100.00%) BB#[[FAILURE:[0-9]+]]
; IR: BB#[[SUCCESS]]:
; IR: BB#[[FAILURE]]:
; IR: CALL64pcrel32 <ga:@__stack_chk_fail>
; DARWIN-IR: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; DARWIN-IR: Successors according to CFG: BB#[[SUCCESS:[0-9]+]]({{[0-9a-fx/= ]+}}100.00%) BB#[[FAILURE:[0-9]+]]
; DARWIN-IR: BB#[[SUCCESS]]:
; DARWIN-IR: BB#[[FAILURE]]:
; DARWIN-IR: CALL64pcrel32 <ga:@__stack_chk_fail>
; MSVC-SELDAG: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; MSVC-SELDAG: mem:Volatile LD4[@__security_cookie]
; MSVC-SELDAG: ST4[FixedStack0]
; MSVC-SELDAG: LD4[FixedStack0]
; MSVC-SELDAG: CALLpcrel32 <ga:@__security_check_cookie>
; MSVC-IR: # Machine code for function test_branch_weights:
; MSVC-IR: mem:Volatile LD4[@__security_cookie]
; MSVC-IR: ST4[FixedStack0]
; MSVC-IR: LD4[%StackGuardSlot]
; MSVC-IR: CALLpcrel32 <ga:@__security_check_cookie>
define i32 @test_branch_weights(i32 %n) #0 {
entry:
@ -33,4 +47,4 @@ declare void @foo2(i32*)
declare void @llvm.lifetime.end(i64, i8* nocapture)
attributes #0 = { ssp "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" }
attributes #0 = { sspstrong "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" }

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff