PR10304: Do not call destructors for data members from union destructors. Prior to C++11, this

has no effect since any such destructors must be trivial, and in C++11 such destructors must not
be called.

llvm-svn: 139997

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp

@@ -980,6 +980,10 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EnterDtorCleanups(const CXXDestructorDecl *DD,
 
   const CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = DD->getParent();
 
+  // Unions have no bases and do not call field destructors.
+  if (ClassDecl->isUnion())
+    return;
+
   // The complete-destructor phase just destructs all the virtual bases.
   if (DtorType == Dtor_Complete) {
 

clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp

@@ -2767,8 +2767,9 @@ void Sema::ActOnMemInitializers(Decl *ConstructorDecl,
 void
 Sema::MarkBaseAndMemberDestructorsReferenced(SourceLocation Location,
                                              CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl) {
-  // Ignore dependent contexts.
+  // Ignore dependent contexts. Also ignore unions, since their members never
-  if (ClassDecl->isDependentContext())
+  // have destructors implicitly called.
+  if (ClassDecl->isDependentContext() || ClassDecl->isUnion())
     return;
 
   // FIXME: all the access-control diagnostics are positioned on the

clang/test/CodeGenCXX/union-dtor.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++0x %s -S -o - -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s
+
+// PR10304: destructors should not call destructors for variant members.
+
+template<bool b = false>
+struct Foo {
+  Foo() { static_assert(b, "Foo::Foo used"); }
+  ~Foo() { static_assert(b, "Foo::~Foo used"); }
+};
+
+struct Bar {
+  Bar();
+  ~Bar();
+};
+
+union FooBar {
+  FooBar() {}
+  ~FooBar() {}
+  Foo<> foo;
+  Bar bar;
+};
+
+struct Variant {
+  Variant() {}
+  ~Variant() {}
+  union {
+    Foo<> foo;
+    Bar bar;
+  };
+};
+
+FooBar foobar;
+Variant variant;
+
+// The ctor and dtor of Foo<> and Bar should not be mentioned in the resulting
+// code.
+//
+// CHECK-NOT: 3FooILb1EEC1
+// CHECK-NOT: 3BarC1
+//
+// CHECK-NOT: 3FooILb1EED1
+// CHECK-NOT: 3BarD1