forked from OSchip/llvm-project
PR44721: Don't consider overloaded operators for built-in comparisons
when building a defaulted comparison. As a convenient way of asking whether `x @ y` is valid and building it, we previouly always performed overload resolution and built an overloaded expression, which would both end up picking a builtin operator candidate when given a non-overloadable type. But that's not quite right, because it can result in our finding a user-declared operator overload, which we should never do when applying operators non-overloadable types. Handle this more correctly: skip overload resolution when building `x @ y` if the operands are not overloadable. But still perform overload resolution (considering only builtin candidates) when checking validity, as we don't have any other good way to ask whether a binary operator expression would be valid.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d28763cad0
commit
1f3f8c369a
|
@ -7373,7 +7373,14 @@ private:
|
|||
/// resolution [...]
|
||||
CandidateSet.exclude(FD);
|
||||
|
||||
S.LookupOverloadedBinOp(CandidateSet, OO, Fns, Args);
|
||||
if (Args[0]->getType()->isOverloadableType())
|
||||
S.LookupOverloadedBinOp(CandidateSet, OO, Fns, Args);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// FIXME: We determine whether this is a valid expression by checking to
|
||||
// see if there's a viable builtin operator candidate for it. That isn't
|
||||
// really what the rules ask us to do, but should give the right results.
|
||||
S.AddBuiltinOperatorCandidates(OO, FD->getLocation(), Args, CandidateSet);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Result R;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -7826,10 +7833,14 @@ private:
|
|||
return StmtError();
|
||||
|
||||
OverloadedOperatorKind OO = FD->getOverloadedOperator();
|
||||
ExprResult Op = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(
|
||||
Loc, BinaryOperator::getOverloadedOpcode(OO), Fns,
|
||||
Obj.first.get(), Obj.second.get(), /*PerformADL=*/true,
|
||||
/*AllowRewrittenCandidates=*/true, FD);
|
||||
BinaryOperatorKind Opc = BinaryOperator::getOverloadedOpcode(OO);
|
||||
ExprResult Op;
|
||||
if (Type->isOverloadableType())
|
||||
Op = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, Opc, Fns, Obj.first.get(),
|
||||
Obj.second.get(), /*PerformADL=*/true,
|
||||
/*AllowRewrittenCandidates=*/true, FD);
|
||||
else
|
||||
Op = S.CreateBuiltinBinOp(Loc, Opc, Obj.first.get(), Obj.second.get());
|
||||
if (Op.isInvalid())
|
||||
return StmtError();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -7869,8 +7880,12 @@ private:
|
|||
llvm::APInt ZeroVal(S.Context.getIntWidth(S.Context.IntTy), 0);
|
||||
Expr *Zero =
|
||||
IntegerLiteral::Create(S.Context, ZeroVal, S.Context.IntTy, Loc);
|
||||
ExprResult Comp = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, Fns, VDRef.get(),
|
||||
Zero, true, true, FD);
|
||||
ExprResult Comp;
|
||||
if (VDRef.get()->getType()->isOverloadableType())
|
||||
Comp = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, Fns, VDRef.get(), Zero, true,
|
||||
true, FD);
|
||||
else
|
||||
Comp = S.CreateBuiltinBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, VDRef.get(), Zero);
|
||||
if (Comp.isInvalid())
|
||||
return StmtError();
|
||||
Sema::ConditionResult Cond = S.ActOnCondition(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -190,3 +190,15 @@ bool operator<(const G&, const G&);
|
|||
bool operator<=(const G&, const G&);
|
||||
bool operator>(const G&, const G&);
|
||||
bool operator>=(const G&, const G&);
|
||||
|
||||
namespace PR44721 {
|
||||
template <typename T> bool operator==(T const &, T const &) { return true; }
|
||||
template <typename T, typename U> bool operator!=(T const &, U const &) { return true; }
|
||||
template <typename T> int operator<=>(T const &, T const &) { return 0; }
|
||||
|
||||
struct S {
|
||||
friend bool operator==(const S &, const S &) = default;
|
||||
friend bool operator<=>(const S &, const S &) = default;
|
||||
int x;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue