forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[TargetLowering] add special-case for demanded bits analysis of 'not'
We treat bitwise 'not' as a special operation and try not to reduce its all-ones mask. Presumably, this is because a 'not' may be cheaper than a generic 'xor' or it may get folded into another logic op if the target has those. However, if we can remove a logic instruction by changing the xor's constant mask value, that should always be a win. Note that the IR version of SimplifyDemandedBits() does not treat 'not' as a special-case currently (although that's marked with a FIXME). So if you run this IR through -instcombine, you should get the same end result. I'm hoping to add a different backend transform that will expose this problem though, so I need to solve this first. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27356 llvm-svn: 288676
This commit is contained in:
parent
f807f6a05f
commit
1f158d6955
|
@ -554,16 +554,30 @@ bool TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedBits(SDValue Op,
|
|||
// simplify the LHS, here we're using information from the LHS to simplify
|
||||
// the RHS.
|
||||
if (ConstantSDNode *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1))) {
|
||||
SDValue Op0 = Op.getOperand(0);
|
||||
APInt LHSZero, LHSOne;
|
||||
// Do not increment Depth here; that can cause an infinite loop.
|
||||
TLO.DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(0), LHSZero, LHSOne, Depth);
|
||||
TLO.DAG.computeKnownBits(Op0, LHSZero, LHSOne, Depth);
|
||||
// If the LHS already has zeros where RHSC does, this and is dead.
|
||||
if ((LHSZero & NewMask) == (~RHSC->getAPIntValue() & NewMask))
|
||||
return TLO.CombineTo(Op, Op.getOperand(0));
|
||||
return TLO.CombineTo(Op, Op0);
|
||||
|
||||
// If any of the set bits in the RHS are known zero on the LHS, shrink
|
||||
// the constant.
|
||||
if (TLO.ShrinkDemandedConstant(Op, ~LHSZero & NewMask))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Bitwise-not (xor X, -1) is a special case: we don't usually shrink its
|
||||
// constant, but if this 'and' is only clearing bits that were just set by
|
||||
// the xor, then this 'and' can be eliminated by shrinking the mask of
|
||||
// the xor. For example, for a 32-bit X:
|
||||
// and (xor (srl X, 31), -1), 1 --> xor (srl X, 31), 1
|
||||
if (isBitwiseNot(Op0) && Op0.hasOneUse() &&
|
||||
LHSOne == ~RHSC->getAPIntValue()) {
|
||||
SDValue Xor = TLO.DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, dl, Op.getValueType(),
|
||||
Op0.getOperand(0), Op.getOperand(1));
|
||||
return TLO.CombineTo(Op, Xor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (SimplifyDemandedBits(Op.getOperand(1), NewMask, KnownZero,
|
||||
|
@ -679,10 +693,10 @@ bool TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedBits(SDValue Op,
|
|||
|
||||
// If the RHS is a constant, see if we can simplify it.
|
||||
// for XOR, we prefer to force bits to 1 if they will make a -1.
|
||||
// if we can't force bits, try to shrink constant
|
||||
// If we can't force bits, try to shrink the constant.
|
||||
if (ConstantSDNode *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1))) {
|
||||
APInt Expanded = C->getAPIntValue() | (~NewMask);
|
||||
// if we can expand it to have all bits set, do it
|
||||
// If we can expand it to have all bits set, do it.
|
||||
if (Expanded.isAllOnesValue()) {
|
||||
if (Expanded != C->getAPIntValue()) {
|
||||
EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
|
||||
|
@ -690,7 +704,7 @@ bool TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedBits(SDValue Op,
|
|||
TLO.DAG.getConstant(Expanded, dl, VT));
|
||||
return TLO.CombineTo(Op, New);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// if it already has all the bits set, nothing to change
|
||||
// If it already has all the bits set, nothing to change
|
||||
// but don't shrink either!
|
||||
} else if (TLO.ShrinkDemandedConstant(Op, NewMask)) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,20 +5,12 @@
|
|||
; Clear high bits via shift, set them with xor (not), then mask them off.
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @shrink_xor_constant1(i32 %x) {
|
||||
; NO_BMI-LABEL: shrink_xor_constant1:
|
||||
; NO_BMI: # BB#0:
|
||||
; NO_BMI-NEXT: shrl $31, %edi
|
||||
; NO_BMI-NEXT: notl %edi
|
||||
; NO_BMI-NEXT: andl $1, %edi
|
||||
; NO_BMI-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
|
||||
; NO_BMI-NEXT: retq
|
||||
;
|
||||
; BMI-LABEL: shrink_xor_constant1:
|
||||
; BMI: # BB#0:
|
||||
; BMI-NEXT: shrl $31, %edi
|
||||
; BMI-NEXT: movl $1, %eax
|
||||
; BMI-NEXT: andnl %eax, %edi, %eax
|
||||
; BMI-NEXT: retq
|
||||
; ALL-LABEL: shrink_xor_constant1:
|
||||
; ALL: # BB#0:
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: shrl $31, %edi
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: xorl $1, %edi
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: retq
|
||||
;
|
||||
%sh = lshr i32 %x, 31
|
||||
%not = xor i32 %sh, -1
|
||||
|
@ -32,8 +24,7 @@ define i8 @shrink_xor_constant2(i8 %x) {
|
|||
; ALL-LABEL: shrink_xor_constant2:
|
||||
; ALL: # BB#0:
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: shlb $5, %dil
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: notb %dil
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: andb $-32, %dil
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: xorb $-32, %dil
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
|
||||
; ALL-NEXT: retq
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue