forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[clang-tools-extra] fix the check for if '-latomic' is necessary
Summary: The CheckAtomic module performs two tests to determine if passing '-latomic' to the linker is required: one for 64-bit atomics, and another for non-64-bit atomics. clangd only uses the result from HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB. This is incomplete because there are uses of non-64-bit atomics in the code, such as the ReplyOnce::Replied of type std::atomic<bool> defined in clangd/ClangdLSPServer.cpp. Fix by also checking for the result of HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB. See also: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68964 Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, nridge, kadircet, beanz, compnerd, luismarques Reviewed By: luismarques Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69869
This commit is contained in:
parent
9816e726e7
commit
1d40c41506
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ if(CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE)
|
|||
endif()
|
||||
|
||||
set(CLANGD_ATOMIC_LIB "")
|
||||
if(NOT HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB)
|
||||
if(NOT HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB OR NOT HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB)
|
||||
list(APPEND CLANGD_ATOMIC_LIB "atomic")
|
||||
endif()
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue