forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Fix PR2002. Suppose n is the initial value for the induction
variable (with step 1) and m is its final value. Then, the correct trip count is SMAX(m,n)-n. Previously, we used SMAX(0,m-n), but m-n may overflow and can't in general be interpreted as signed. Patch by Nick Lewycky. llvm-svn: 47007
This commit is contained in:
parent
716c10c01e
commit
1d2c27b23e
|
@ -2527,19 +2527,17 @@ HowManyLessThans(SCEV *LHS, SCEV *RHS, const Loop *L, bool isSigned) {
|
|||
if (AddRec->isAffine()) {
|
||||
// The number of iterations for "{n,+,1} < m", is m-n. However, we don't
|
||||
// know that m is >= n on input to the loop. If it is, the condition
|
||||
// returns true zero times. To handle both cases, we return SMAX(0, m-n).
|
||||
// returns true zero times. To handle both cases, we return SMAX(m, n)-n.
|
||||
|
||||
// FORNOW: We only support unit strides.
|
||||
SCEVHandle One = SE.getIntegerSCEV(1, RHS->getType());
|
||||
if (AddRec->getOperand(1) != One)
|
||||
return UnknownValue;
|
||||
|
||||
SCEVHandle Iters = SE.getMinusSCEV(RHS, AddRec->getOperand(0));
|
||||
SCEVHandle Start = AddRec->getOperand(0);
|
||||
SCEVHandle End = isSigned ? SE.getSMaxExpr(RHS, Start) : (SCEVHandle)RHS;
|
||||
|
||||
if (isSigned)
|
||||
return SE.getSMaxExpr(SE.getIntegerSCEV(0, RHS->getType()), Iters);
|
||||
else
|
||||
return Iters;
|
||||
return SE.getMinusSCEV(End, Start);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return UnknownValue;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -scalar-evolution -analyze | grep {Loop loop: ( 100 + ( -100 smax %n)) iterations!}
|
||||
; PR2002
|
||||
|
||||
define void @foo(i8 %n) {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %loop
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
%i = phi i8 [ -100, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %next ]
|
||||
%cond = icmp slt i8 %i, %n
|
||||
br i1 %cond, label %next, label %return
|
||||
next:
|
||||
%i.inc = add i8 %i, 1
|
||||
br label %loop
|
||||
return:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue