Fix codegen for conditionals with incommpatible pointer types. Code

that causes this isn't really correct, but if we're going to accept 
this, it should come up with a consistent AST.

llvm-svn: 46557
This commit is contained in:
Eli Friedman 2008-01-30 17:02:03 +00:00
parent 02b6792dd4
commit 1bc0fed9a5
2 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -823,7 +823,13 @@ inline QualType Sema::CheckConditionalOperands( // C99 6.5.15
Diag(questionLoc, diag::ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_pointers,
lexT.getAsString(), rexT.getAsString(),
lex->getSourceRange(), rex->getSourceRange());
return lexT; // FIXME: this is an _ext - is this return o.k?
// In this situation, we assume void* type. No especially good
// reason, but this is what gcc does, and we do have to pick
// to get a consistent AST.
QualType voidPtrTy = Context.getPointerType(Context.VoidTy);
ImpCastExprToType(lex, voidPtrTy);
ImpCastExprToType(rex, voidPtrTy);
return voidPtrTy;
}
// The pointer types are compatible.
// C99 6.5.15p6: If both operands are pointers to compatible types *or* to

View File

@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ void test3(){
1 ? f() : (void)0;
}
void test4() {
int i; short j;
float* k = 1 ? &i : &j;
}