Minor cleanups. There is no reason for SCCP to derive from instvisitor anymore.

llvm-svn: 17825
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2004-11-15 07:15:04 +00:00
parent 9a038a3a5e
commit 1890f94413
1 changed files with 14 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -794,23 +794,21 @@ void SCCPSolver::Solve() {
namespace {
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
/// SCCP Class - This class does all of the work of Sparse Conditional Constant
/// Propagation.
///
class SCCP : public FunctionPass, public InstVisitor<SCCP> {
public:
// runOnFunction - Run the Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation algorithm,
// and return true if the function was modified.
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
/// SCCP Class - This class uses the SCCPSolver to implement a per-function
/// Sparse Conditional COnstant Propagator.
///
struct SCCP : public FunctionPass {
// runOnFunction - Run the Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation
// algorithm, and return true if the function was modified.
//
bool runOnFunction(Function &F);
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
}
};
};
RegisterOpt<SCCP> X("sccp", "Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation");
} // end anonymous namespace
@ -822,10 +820,6 @@ FunctionPass *llvm::createSCCPPass() {
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// SCCP Class Implementation
// runOnFunction() - Run the Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation algorithm,
// and return true if the function was modified.
//
@ -907,4 +901,3 @@ bool SCCP::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
return MadeChanges;
}