forked from OSchip/llvm-project
New clang option -mpie-copy-relocations to use copy relocations for PIE builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19996 llvm-svn: 284638
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ca9a31948
commit
165a8845f8
|
@ -1691,6 +1691,10 @@ def mno_implicit_float : Flag<["-"], "mno-implicit-float">, Group<m_Group>,
|
|||
def mimplicit_float : Flag<["-"], "mimplicit-float">, Group<m_Group>;
|
||||
def mrecip : Flag<["-"], "mrecip">, Group<m_Group>;
|
||||
def mrecip_EQ : CommaJoined<["-"], "mrecip=">, Group<m_Group>, Flags<[CC1Option]>;
|
||||
def mpie_copy_relocations : Flag<["-"], "mpie-copy-relocations">, Group<m_Group>,
|
||||
Flags<[CC1Option]>,
|
||||
HelpText<"Use copy relocations support for PIE builds">;
|
||||
def mno_pie_copy_relocations : Flag<["-"], "mno-pie-copy-relocations">, Group<m_Group>;
|
||||
def mx87 : Flag<["-"], "mx87">, Group<m_x86_Features_Group>;
|
||||
def m80387 : Flag<["-"], "m80387">, Alias<mx87>;
|
||||
def msse2 : Flag<["-"], "msse2">, Group<m_x86_Features_Group>;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -252,6 +252,9 @@ VALUE_CODEGENOPT(EmitCheckPathComponentsToStrip, 32, 0)
|
|||
/// Whether to report the hotness of the code region for optimization remarks.
|
||||
CODEGENOPT(DiagnosticsWithHotness, 1, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether copy relocations support is available when building as PIE.
|
||||
CODEGENOPT(PIECopyRelocations, 1, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
#undef CODEGENOPT
|
||||
#undef ENUM_CODEGENOPT
|
||||
#undef VALUE_CODEGENOPT
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -595,6 +595,8 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::CreateTargetMachine(bool MustCreateTM) {
|
|||
Options.MCOptions.MCNoExecStack = CodeGenOpts.NoExecStack;
|
||||
Options.MCOptions.MCIncrementalLinkerCompatible =
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.IncrementalLinkerCompatible;
|
||||
Options.MCOptions.MCPIECopyRelocations =
|
||||
CodeGenOpts.PIECopyRelocations;
|
||||
Options.MCOptions.MCFatalWarnings = CodeGenOpts.FatalWarnings;
|
||||
Options.MCOptions.AsmVerbose = CodeGenOpts.AsmVerbose;
|
||||
Options.MCOptions.PreserveAsmComments = CodeGenOpts.PreserveAsmComments;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4499,6 +4499,12 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
|
|||
CmdArgs.push_back("-mms-bitfields");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mpie_copy_relocations,
|
||||
options::OPT_mno_pie_copy_relocations,
|
||||
false)) {
|
||||
CmdArgs.push_back("-mpie-copy-relocations");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This is a coarse approximation of what llvm-gcc actually does, both
|
||||
// -fasynchronous-unwind-tables and -fnon-call-exceptions interact in more
|
||||
// complicated ways.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -586,6 +586,8 @@ static bool ParseCodeGenArgs(CodeGenOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
|
|||
Opts.RelaxAll = Args.hasArg(OPT_mrelax_all);
|
||||
Opts.IncrementalLinkerCompatible =
|
||||
Args.hasArg(OPT_mincremental_linker_compatible);
|
||||
Opts.PIECopyRelocations =
|
||||
Args.hasArg(OPT_mpie_copy_relocations);
|
||||
Opts.OmitLeafFramePointer = Args.hasArg(OPT_momit_leaf_frame_pointer);
|
||||
Opts.SaveTempLabels = Args.hasArg(OPT_msave_temp_labels);
|
||||
Opts.NoDwarfDirectoryAsm = Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_dwarf_directory_asm);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue