forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Use zip_longest for iterator range comparisons. NFC.
Use zip_longest in two locations that compare iterator ranges. zip_longest allows the iteration using a range-based for-loop and to be symmetric over both ranges instead of prioritizing one over the other. In that latter case code have to handle the case that the first is longer than the second, the second is longer than the first, and both are of the same length, which must partially be checked after the loop. With zip_longest, this becomes an element comparison within the loop like the comparison of the elements themselves. The symmetry makes it clearer that neither the first and second iterators are handled differently. The iterators are not event used directly anymore, just the ranges. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55468 llvm-svn: 348762
This commit is contained in:
parent
84e89ff06f
commit
157a355f3b
|
@ -8977,25 +8977,28 @@ static Comparison compareEnableIfAttrs(const Sema &S, const FunctionDecl *Cand1,
|
|||
auto Cand1Attrs = Cand1->specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>();
|
||||
auto Cand2Attrs = Cand2->specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>();
|
||||
|
||||
auto Cand1I = Cand1Attrs.begin();
|
||||
llvm::FoldingSetNodeID Cand1ID, Cand2ID;
|
||||
for (EnableIfAttr *Cand2A : Cand2Attrs) {
|
||||
for (auto Pair : zip_longest(Cand1Attrs, Cand2Attrs)) {
|
||||
Optional<EnableIfAttr *> Cand1A = std::get<0>(Pair);
|
||||
Optional<EnableIfAttr *> Cand2A = std::get<1>(Pair);
|
||||
|
||||
// It's impossible for Cand1 to be better than (or equal to) Cand2 if Cand1
|
||||
// has fewer enable_if attributes than Cand2, and vice versa.
|
||||
if (!Cand1A)
|
||||
return Comparison::Worse;
|
||||
if (!Cand2A)
|
||||
return Comparison::Better;
|
||||
|
||||
Cand1ID.clear();
|
||||
Cand2ID.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
// It's impossible for Cand1 to be better than (or equal to) Cand2 if Cand1
|
||||
// has fewer enable_if attributes than Cand2.
|
||||
auto Cand1A = Cand1I++;
|
||||
if (Cand1A == Cand1Attrs.end())
|
||||
return Comparison::Worse;
|
||||
|
||||
Cand1A->getCond()->Profile(Cand1ID, S.getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
Cand2A->getCond()->Profile(Cand2ID, S.getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
(*Cand1A)->getCond()->Profile(Cand1ID, S.getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
(*Cand2A)->getCond()->Profile(Cand2ID, S.getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
if (Cand1ID != Cand2ID)
|
||||
return Comparison::Worse;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return Cand1I == Cand1Attrs.end() ? Comparison::Equal : Comparison::Better;
|
||||
return Comparison::Equal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool isBetterMultiversionCandidate(const OverloadCandidate &Cand1,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2913,25 +2913,30 @@ static bool hasSameOverloadableAttrs(const FunctionDecl *A,
|
|||
// Note that pass_object_size attributes are represented in the function's
|
||||
// ExtParameterInfo, so we don't need to check them here.
|
||||
|
||||
// Return false if any of the enable_if expressions of A and B are different.
|
||||
llvm::FoldingSetNodeID Cand1ID, Cand2ID;
|
||||
auto AEnableIfAttrs = A->specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>();
|
||||
auto BEnableIfAttrs = B->specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>();
|
||||
auto AEnableIf = AEnableIfAttrs.begin();
|
||||
auto BEnableIf = BEnableIfAttrs.begin();
|
||||
for (; AEnableIf != AEnableIfAttrs.end() && BEnableIf != BEnableIfAttrs.end();
|
||||
++BEnableIf, ++AEnableIf) {
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto Pair : zip_longest(AEnableIfAttrs, BEnableIfAttrs)) {
|
||||
Optional<EnableIfAttr *> Cand1A = std::get<0>(Pair);
|
||||
Optional<EnableIfAttr *> Cand2A = std::get<1>(Pair);
|
||||
|
||||
// Return false if the number of enable_if attributes is different.
|
||||
if (!Cand1A || !Cand2A)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
Cand1ID.clear();
|
||||
Cand2ID.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
AEnableIf->getCond()->Profile(Cand1ID, A->getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
BEnableIf->getCond()->Profile(Cand2ID, B->getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
(*Cand1A)->getCond()->Profile(Cand1ID, A->getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
(*Cand2A)->getCond()->Profile(Cand2ID, B->getASTContext(), true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Return false if any of the enable_if expressions of A and B are
|
||||
// different.
|
||||
if (Cand1ID != Cand2ID)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Return false if the number of enable_if attributes was different.
|
||||
return AEnableIf == AEnableIfAttrs.end() && BEnableIf == BEnableIfAttrs.end();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Determine whether the two declarations refer to the same entity.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue