[InstCombine] fadd double (sitofp x), y check that the promotion is valid

Doing these transformations check that the result of integer addition is representable in the FP type.

(fadd double (sitofp x), fpcst) --> (sitofp (add int x, intcst))
(fadd double (sitofp x), (sitofp y)) --> (sitofp (add int x, y))

This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=27036

Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor, scanon, spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31182

llvm-svn: 301018
This commit is contained in:
Artur Pilipenko 2017-04-21 18:45:25 +00:00
parent c3ecc4b314
commit 134d94f9a3
2 changed files with 123 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@ -1385,39 +1385,55 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFAdd(BinaryOperator &I) {
// integer add followed by a promotion.
if (SIToFPInst *LHSConv = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(LHS)) {
Value *LHSIntVal = LHSConv->getOperand(0);
Type *FPType = LHSConv->getType();
// TODO: This check is overly conservative. In many cases known bits
// analysis can tell us that the result of the addition has less significant
// bits than the integer type can hold.
auto IsValidPromotion = [](Type *FTy, Type *ITy) {
// Do we have enough bits in the significand to represent the result of
// the integer addition?
unsigned MaxRepresentableBits =
APFloat::semanticsPrecision(FTy->getFltSemantics());
return ITy->getIntegerBitWidth() <= MaxRepresentableBits;
};
// (fadd double (sitofp x), fpcst) --> (sitofp (add int x, intcst))
// ... if the constant fits in the integer value. This is useful for things
// like (double)(x & 1234) + 4.0 -> (double)((X & 1234)+4) which no longer
// requires a constant pool load, and generally allows the add to be better
// instcombined.
if (ConstantFP *CFP = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(RHS)) {
Constant *CI =
ConstantExpr::getFPToSI(CFP, LHSIntVal->getType());
if (LHSConv->hasOneUse() &&
ConstantExpr::getSIToFP(CI, I.getType()) == CFP &&
WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(LHSIntVal, CI, I)) {
// Insert the new integer add.
Value *NewAdd = Builder->CreateNSWAdd(LHSIntVal,
CI, "addconv");
return new SIToFPInst(NewAdd, I.getType());
if (ConstantFP *CFP = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(RHS))
if (IsValidPromotion(FPType, LHSIntVal->getType())) {
Constant *CI =
ConstantExpr::getFPToSI(CFP, LHSIntVal->getType());
if (LHSConv->hasOneUse() &&
ConstantExpr::getSIToFP(CI, I.getType()) == CFP &&
WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(LHSIntVal, CI, I)) {
// Insert the new integer add.
Value *NewAdd = Builder->CreateNSWAdd(LHSIntVal,
CI, "addconv");
return new SIToFPInst(NewAdd, I.getType());
}
}
}
// (fadd double (sitofp x), (sitofp y)) --> (sitofp (add int x, y))
if (SIToFPInst *RHSConv = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(RHS)) {
Value *RHSIntVal = RHSConv->getOperand(0);
// Only do this if x/y have the same type, if at least one of them has a
// single use (so we don't increase the number of int->fp conversions),
// and if the integer add will not overflow.
if (LHSIntVal->getType() == RHSIntVal->getType() &&
(LHSConv->hasOneUse() || RHSConv->hasOneUse()) &&
WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(LHSIntVal, RHSIntVal, I)) {
// Insert the new integer add.
Value *NewAdd = Builder->CreateNSWAdd(LHSIntVal,
RHSIntVal, "addconv");
return new SIToFPInst(NewAdd, I.getType());
// It's enough to check LHS types only because we require int types to
// be the same for this transform.
if (IsValidPromotion(FPType, LHSIntVal->getType())) {
// Only do this if x/y have the same type, if at least one of them has a
// single use (so we don't increase the number of int->fp conversions),
// and if the integer add will not overflow.
if (LHSIntVal->getType() == RHSIntVal->getType() &&
(LHSConv->hasOneUse() || RHSConv->hasOneUse()) &&
WillNotOverflowSignedAdd(LHSIntVal, RHSIntVal, I)) {
// Insert the new integer add.
Value *NewAdd = Builder->CreateNSWAdd(LHSIntVal,
RHSIntVal, "addconv");
return new SIToFPInst(NewAdd, I.getType());
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -15,3 +15,88 @@ define double @x(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%p = fadd double %o, 1.0
ret double %p
}
define double @test(i32 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADDCONV:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[A_AND]], 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[ADDCONV]] to double
; CHECK-NEXT: ret double [[RES]]
;
; Drop two highest bits to guarantee that %a + 1 doesn't overflow
%a_and = and i32 %a, 1073741823
%a_and_fp = sitofp i32 %a_and to double
%res = fadd double %a_and_fp, 1.0
ret double %res
}
define float @test_neg(i32 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_neg(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND_FP:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[A_AND]] to float
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = fadd float [[A_AND_FP]], 1.000000e+00
; CHECK-NEXT: ret float [[RES]]
;
; Drop two highest bits to guarantee that %a + 1 doesn't overflow
%a_and = and i32 %a, 1073741823
%a_and_fp = sitofp i32 %a_and to float
%res = fadd float %a_and_fp, 1.0
ret float %res
}
define double @test_2(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_2(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[B:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADDCONV:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[A_AND]], [[B_AND]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[ADDCONV]] to double
; CHECK-NEXT: ret double [[RES]]
;
; Drop two highest bits to guarantee that %a + %b doesn't overflow
%a_and = and i32 %a, 1073741823
%b_and = and i32 %b, 1073741823
%a_and_fp = sitofp i32 %a_and to double
%b_and_fp = sitofp i32 %b_and to double
%res = fadd double %a_and_fp, %b_and_fp
ret double %res
}
define float @test_2_neg(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_2_neg(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B_AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[B:%.*]], 1073741823
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A_AND_FP:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[A_AND]] to float
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B_AND_FP:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[B_AND]] to float
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES:%.*]] = fadd float [[A_AND_FP]], [[B_AND_FP]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret float [[RES]]
;
; Drop two highest bits to guarantee that %a + %b doesn't overflow
%a_and = and i32 %a, 1073741823
%b_and = and i32 %b, 1073741823
%a_and_fp = sitofp i32 %a_and to float
%b_and_fp = sitofp i32 %b_and to float
%res = fadd float %a_and_fp, %b_and_fp
ret float %res
}
; This test demonstrates overly conservative legality check. The float addition
; can be replaced with the integer addition because the result of the operation
; can be represented in float, but we don't do that now.
define float @test_3(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_3(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[M:%.*]] = lshr i32 [[A:%.*]], 24
; CHECK-NEXT: [[N:%.*]] = and i32 [[M]], [[B:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[O:%.*]] = sitofp i32 [[N]] to float
; CHECK-NEXT: [[P:%.*]] = fadd float [[O]], 1.000000e+00
; CHECK-NEXT: ret float [[P]]
;
%m = lshr i32 %a, 24
%n = and i32 %m, %b
%o = sitofp i32 %n to float
%p = fadd float %o, 1.0
ret float %p
}