[clang-format] broken after lambda with return type template with boolean literal

Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910

Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous

Reviewed By: jkorous

Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang-tools-extra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922

llvm-svn: 355450
This commit is contained in:
Paul Hoad 2019-03-05 22:20:25 +00:00
parent f228b2c2ef
commit 10de395489
2 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1442,6 +1442,8 @@ bool UnwrappedLineParser::tryToParseLambda() {
case tok::lessequal:
case tok::question:
case tok::colon:
case tok::kw_true:
case tok::kw_false:
nextToken();
break;
case tok::arrow:

View File

@ -11936,6 +11936,21 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsLambdas) {
"// broken:\n"
"auto foo{[]() -> foo<2 ? 1 : 0> { return {}; }};\n"
"} // namespace bar");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<1> {};");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<1> { ; };");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<1> { ; }();");
verifyFormat("[a, a]() -> a<true> {};");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<true> {};");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<true> { ; };");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<true> { ; }();");
verifyFormat("[a, a]() -> a<false> {};");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<false> {};");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<false> { ; };");
verifyFormat("[]() -> a<false> { ; }();");
verifyFormat("auto foo{[]() -> foo<false> { ; }};");
verifyFormat("namespace bar {\n"
"auto foo{[]() -> foo<false> { ; }};\n"
"} // namespace bar");
verifyFormat("auto aaaaaaaa = [](int i, // break for some reason\n"
" int j) -> int {\n"
" return ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff(i * j);\n"