forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[InstCombine] treat i1 as a special type in shouldChangeType()
This patch is based on the llvm-dev discussion here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109631.html Folding to i1 should always be desirable because that's better for value tracking and we have special folds for i1 types. I checked for other users of shouldChangeType() where this might have an effect, but we already handle the i1 case differently than other types in all of those cases. Side note: the default datalayout includes i1, so it seems we only find this gap in shouldChangeType + phi folding for the case when there is (1) an explicit datalayout without i1, (2) casting to i1 from a legal type, and (3) a phi with exactly 2 incoming casted operands (as Björn mentioned). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29336 llvm-svn: 294066
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e838bd142
commit
0fe32ac256
|
@ -89,11 +89,13 @@ Value *InstCombiner::EmitGEPOffset(User *GEP) {
|
|||
/// Return true if it is desirable to convert an integer computation from a
|
||||
/// given bit width to a new bit width.
|
||||
/// We don't want to convert from a legal to an illegal type or from a smaller
|
||||
/// to a larger illegal type.
|
||||
/// to a larger illegal type. A width of '1' is always treated as a legal type
|
||||
/// because i1 is a fundamental type in IR, and there are many specialized
|
||||
/// optimizations for i1 types.
|
||||
bool InstCombiner::shouldChangeType(unsigned FromWidth,
|
||||
unsigned ToWidth) const {
|
||||
bool FromLegal = DL.isLegalInteger(FromWidth);
|
||||
bool ToLegal = DL.isLegalInteger(ToWidth);
|
||||
bool FromLegal = FromWidth == 1 || DL.isLegalInteger(FromWidth);
|
||||
bool ToLegal = ToWidth == 1 || DL.isLegalInteger(ToWidth);
|
||||
|
||||
// If this is a legal integer from type, and the result would be an illegal
|
||||
// type, don't do the transformation.
|
||||
|
@ -110,7 +112,9 @@ bool InstCombiner::shouldChangeType(unsigned FromWidth,
|
|||
|
||||
/// Return true if it is desirable to convert a computation from 'From' to 'To'.
|
||||
/// We don't want to convert from a legal to an illegal type or from a smaller
|
||||
/// to a larger illegal type.
|
||||
/// to a larger illegal type. i1 is always treated as a legal type because it is
|
||||
/// a fundamental type in IR, and there are many specialized optimizations for
|
||||
/// i1 types.
|
||||
bool InstCombiner::shouldChangeType(Type *From, Type *To) const {
|
||||
assert(From->isIntegerTy() && To->isIntegerTy());
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2,16 +2,19 @@
|
|||
|
||||
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-n8:16:32:64"
|
||||
|
||||
; Although i1 is not in the datalayout, we should treat it
|
||||
; as a legal type because it is a fundamental type in IR.
|
||||
; This means we should shrink the phi (sink the zexts).
|
||||
|
||||
define i64 @sink_i1_casts(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @sink_i1_casts(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[Z1:%.*]] = zext i1 %cond1 to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond1, label %if, label %end
|
||||
; CHECK: if:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[Z2:%.*]] = zext i1 %cond2 to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %end
|
||||
; CHECK: end:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[Z1]], %entry ], [ [[Z2]], %if ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI_IN:%.*]] = phi i1 [ %cond1, %entry ], [ %cond2, %if ]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PHI:%.*]] = zext i1 [[PHI_IN]] to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 [[PHI]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue